Adherence to anticoagulant treatment with apixaban and rivaroxaban in a real-world setting

Faris Al-Khalili , Catrine Lindström , Lina Benson
{"title":"Adherence to anticoagulant treatment with apixaban and rivaroxaban in a real-world setting","authors":"Faris Al-Khalili ,&nbsp;Catrine Lindström ,&nbsp;Lina Benson","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrsc.2016.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Low adherence to cardiovascular medications is often difficult to monitor and is associated with adverse outcomes. We investigated whether there is a difference between the estimated adherence (EA) of the two-dosed regimens of apixaban (A) and the one-dosed regimen of rivaroxaban (R) for stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).</p></div><div><h3>Method and results</h3><p>This is a retrospective cohort study of AF patients referred to a well-structured nurse-based AF unit for the initiation of anticoagulation therapy. The adherence data was extracted from the Swedish national prescribed drug register. EA was calculated by dividing the number of daily doses dispensed from the prescription that occurred closest after 3<!--> <!-->months from the first dispensed prescription of the respective agent until (but excluding) the last refill by the number of days in the interval. The study included 123 patients on A and 227 patients on R with a 12-month follow-up period. There were no significant demographic differences between the two patient groups except for previous vitamin K antagonist treatment, in the A patient group (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->29, 24%) and in the R (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->31, 14%), p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.025. The mean<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->SD of EA after 3 months was high for both A 97<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7 (n = 112) and R 97<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->9 (n = 197) p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.97. The EA ≥<!--> <!-->80% was for A 97% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->109) and for R 96% (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->189) p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.43.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The two dosed regimens of apixaban and the one dosed regimen of rivaroxaban showed similar high estimated adherence when administered for stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF in a well-structured nurse-based AF clinic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91232,"journal":{"name":"Clinical trials and regulatory science in cardiology","volume":"18 ","pages":"Pages 1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctrsc.2016.03.003","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical trials and regulatory science in cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405587516300117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Aim

Low adherence to cardiovascular medications is often difficult to monitor and is associated with adverse outcomes. We investigated whether there is a difference between the estimated adherence (EA) of the two-dosed regimens of apixaban (A) and the one-dosed regimen of rivaroxaban (R) for stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).

Method and results

This is a retrospective cohort study of AF patients referred to a well-structured nurse-based AF unit for the initiation of anticoagulation therapy. The adherence data was extracted from the Swedish national prescribed drug register. EA was calculated by dividing the number of daily doses dispensed from the prescription that occurred closest after 3 months from the first dispensed prescription of the respective agent until (but excluding) the last refill by the number of days in the interval. The study included 123 patients on A and 227 patients on R with a 12-month follow-up period. There were no significant demographic differences between the two patient groups except for previous vitamin K antagonist treatment, in the A patient group (n = 29, 24%) and in the R (n = 31, 14%), p = 0.025. The mean ± SD of EA after 3 months was high for both A 97 ± 7 (n = 112) and R 97 ± 9 (n = 197) p = 0.97. The EA ≥ 80% was for A 97% (n = 109) and for R 96% (n = 189) p = 0.43.

Conclusion

The two dosed regimens of apixaban and the one dosed regimen of rivaroxaban showed similar high estimated adherence when administered for stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF in a well-structured nurse-based AF clinic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在现实世界中,阿哌沙班和利伐沙班抗凝治疗的依从性
对心血管药物的低依从性通常难以监测,并与不良后果相关。我们研究了非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)患者预防卒中时,阿哌沙班(a)双剂量方案和利伐沙班(R)单剂量方案的估计依从性(EA)是否存在差异。方法和结果:这是一项针对房颤患者的回顾性队列研究,这些患者被转到结构良好的护士房颤病房开始抗凝治疗。依从性数据取自瑞典国家处方药注册表。EA的计算方法是将从第一次配药处方到(但不包括)最后一次补药的3个月后最接近的处方每日配药剂量除以间隔中的天数。该研究包括123名A组患者和227名R组患者,随访期为12个月。两组患者除既往服用维生素K拮抗剂外,在A组(n = 29, 24%)和R组(n = 31, 14%)中,p = 0.025,统计学上无显著差异。3个月后EA的平均±SD均较高,A(97±7)(n = 112), R(97±9)(n = 197) p = 0.97。EA≥80%的A为97% (n = 109), R为96% (n = 189), p = 0.43。结论在一个结构良好的以护士为基础的房颤诊所中,阿哌沙班和利伐沙班两种给药方案在房颤患者卒中预防中显示出相似的高依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Paclitaxel eluting balloon plus spot bare metal stenting for diffuse and very long coronary disease. (PEB-long pilot study) High prevalence of ST-elevation, early repolarization, and left ventricular hypertrophy during the eligibility assessment for an HIV vaccine trial in young, healthy Tanzanians Using a personalized decision support algorithm for dosing in warfarin treatment: A randomised controlled trial Dose and response to cocoa (DARC): A randomized double-blind controlled trial Massage therapy reduces pain and anxiety after cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1