Is hemoglobin variation a linear predictor of mortality in acute coronary syndrome?

Rita Ferreira, Sofia Lazaro Mendes, Francisco Soares, Francisco Gonçalves, Pedro Monteiro, Silvia Monteiro, Mariano Pêgo
{"title":"Is hemoglobin variation a linear predictor of mortality in acute coronary syndrome?","authors":"Rita Ferreira,&nbsp;Sofia Lazaro Mendes,&nbsp;Francisco Soares,&nbsp;Francisco Gonçalves,&nbsp;Pedro Monteiro,&nbsp;Silvia Monteiro,&nbsp;Mariano Pêgo","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrsc.2016.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Coronary artery disease is a common health problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognosis impact on mortality of the variation of hemoglobin (Hb) levels during hospitalization time.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The retrospective observational study included 2640 patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome in a single coronary care unit from May 2004 until June 2013.</p><p>The primary endpoint was all cause of death at 1<!--> <!-->year of follow up time, and secondary endpoint was all cause of death at 2<!--> <!-->years of the follow up time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four groups were created according to the quartiles of Hb variation (admission Hb minus lowest Hb value) during the hospitalization time: group 1: ≥<!--> <!-->2.1<!--> <!-->g/dL with 627 patients; group 2: &gt;<!--> <!-->1.1 and &lt;<!--> <!-->2.1<!--> <!-->g/dL with 666 patients; group 3: &gt;<!--> <!-->0.3 and ≤<!--> <!-->1.1<!--> <!-->g/dL with 686 patients and group 4: ≤<!--> <!-->0.3<!--> <!-->g/dL with 661 patients.</p><p>A total of 84 patients (3.2%) died during the first year of the follow up. More patients died in group 1 and 4 (6.4% vs 3.7% vs 3.7% vs 6.8%, Log-Rank<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.023). At 2<!--> <!-->years of follow-up, the results were similar, with higher mortality in group 4 (7.3% vs 4.3% vs 4.6% vs 9.2%, Log-Rank<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003).</p><p>Multivariate analysis showed that Hb variation &gt;<!--> <!-->1.1 was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ration<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0309 95% confidence interval, 0.136–0.702; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The patients with the lower baseline hemoglobin and the variability of Hb highest than 1.1<!--> <!-->mg/dL had the worse prognosis with high mortality rate during the follow up time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91232,"journal":{"name":"Clinical trials and regulatory science in cardiology","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 9-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctrsc.2016.05.005","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical trials and regulatory science in cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405587516300154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background and objectives

Coronary artery disease is a common health problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognosis impact on mortality of the variation of hemoglobin (Hb) levels during hospitalization time.

Methods

The retrospective observational study included 2640 patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome in a single coronary care unit from May 2004 until June 2013.

The primary endpoint was all cause of death at 1 year of follow up time, and secondary endpoint was all cause of death at 2 years of the follow up time.

Results

Four groups were created according to the quartiles of Hb variation (admission Hb minus lowest Hb value) during the hospitalization time: group 1: ≥ 2.1 g/dL with 627 patients; group 2: > 1.1 and < 2.1 g/dL with 666 patients; group 3: > 0.3 and ≤ 1.1 g/dL with 686 patients and group 4: ≤ 0.3 g/dL with 661 patients.

A total of 84 patients (3.2%) died during the first year of the follow up. More patients died in group 1 and 4 (6.4% vs 3.7% vs 3.7% vs 6.8%, Log-Rank = 0.023). At 2 years of follow-up, the results were similar, with higher mortality in group 4 (7.3% vs 4.3% vs 4.6% vs 9.2%, Log-Rank = 0.003).

Multivariate analysis showed that Hb variation > 1.1 was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ration = 0309 95% confidence interval, 0.136–0.702; P = 0.005).

Conclusion

The patients with the lower baseline hemoglobin and the variability of Hb highest than 1.1 mg/dL had the worse prognosis with high mortality rate during the follow up time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血红蛋白变异是急性冠状动脉综合征死亡率的线性预测因子吗?
背景与目的冠状动脉疾病是一种常见的健康问题。本研究的目的是评估住院期间血红蛋白(Hb)水平变化对预后和死亡率的影响。方法回顾性观察性研究纳入2004年5月至2013年6月在同一冠状动脉护理病房收治的2640例急性冠状动脉综合征患者。主要终点为随访1年的所有死亡原因,次要终点为随访2年的所有死亡原因。结果根据住院期间Hb变化(入院Hb减去最低Hb值)的四分位数分为四组:第一组:≥2.1 g/dL,共627例;第二组:>1.1和<2.1 g/dL 666例;第三组:>0.3和≤1.1 g/dL 686例,第4组≤0.3 g/dL 661例。在随访的第一年,共有84名患者(3.2%)死亡。1组和4组患者死亡较多(6.4% vs 3.7% vs 3.7% vs 6.8%, Log-Rank = 0.023)。在2年的随访中,结果相似,第4组的死亡率更高(7.3% vs 4.3% vs 4.6% vs 9.2%, Log-Rank = 0.003)。多因素分析显示Hb变异>1.1是死亡率的独立预测因子(危险比= 0309,95%可信区间,0.136-0.702;p = 0.005)。结论基线血红蛋白较低、Hb变异性高于1.1 mg/dL的患者预后较差,随访期间死亡率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Paclitaxel eluting balloon plus spot bare metal stenting for diffuse and very long coronary disease. (PEB-long pilot study) High prevalence of ST-elevation, early repolarization, and left ventricular hypertrophy during the eligibility assessment for an HIV vaccine trial in young, healthy Tanzanians Using a personalized decision support algorithm for dosing in warfarin treatment: A randomised controlled trial Dose and response to cocoa (DARC): A randomized double-blind controlled trial Massage therapy reduces pain and anxiety after cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1