Estudio comparativo, aleatorizado y doble ciego, de la petidina y del ketoprofeno como adyuvantes de la lidocaína en la anestesia regional intravenosa

Sameer N. Desai, M.C.B. Santhosh
{"title":"Estudio comparativo, aleatorizado y doble ciego, de la petidina y del ketoprofeno como adyuvantes de la lidocaína en la anestesia regional intravenosa","authors":"Sameer N. Desai,&nbsp;M.C.B. Santhosh","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>A review of all the adjuncts for intravenous regional anaesthesia concluded that there is good evidence to recommend NonSteroidal Anti-Inflammatory agents and pethidine in the dose of 30<!--> <!-->mg dose as adjuncts to intravenous regional anaesthesia. But there are no studies to compare pethidine of 30<!--> <!-->mg dose to any of the NonSteroidal Anti-Inflammatory agents.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a prospective, randomized, double blind study, 45 patients were given intravenous regional anaesthesia with either lignocaine alone or lignocaine with pethidine 30<!--> <!-->mg or lignocaine with ketprofen 100<!--> <!-->mg. Fentanyl was used as rescue analgesic during surgery. For the first 6<!--> <!-->h of postoperative period analgesia was provided by fentanyl injection and between 6 and 24<!--> <!-->h analgesia was provided by diclofenac tablets. Visual analogue scores for pain and consumption of fentanyl and diclofenac were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The block was inadequate for one case each in lignocaine group and pethidine group, so general anaesthesia was provided. Time for the first dose of fentanyl required for postoperative analgesia was significantly more in pethidine and ketoprofen groups compared to lignocaine group (156.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->148.8 and 153.0<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->106.0 vs. 52.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->52.4<!--> <!-->min respectively). Total fentanyl consumption in first 6<!--> <!-->h of postoperative period was less in pethidine and ketoprofen groups compared to lignocaine group (37.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->29.0<!--> <!-->mcg, 38.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->20.8<!--> <!-->mcg vs. 64.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->27.2<!--> <!-->mcg respectively). Consumption of diclofenac tablets was 2.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.7, 2.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.5 and 2.0<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.7 in the control, pethidine and ketoprofen group respectively, which was statistically not significant. Side effects were not significantly different between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Both pethidine and ketoprofen are equally effective in providing postoperative analgesia up to 6<!--> <!-->h, without significant difference in the side effects and none of the adjuncts provide significant analgesia after 6<!--> <!-->h.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"64 4","pages":"Pages 221-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.03.016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S225549631300158X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

A review of all the adjuncts for intravenous regional anaesthesia concluded that there is good evidence to recommend NonSteroidal Anti-Inflammatory agents and pethidine in the dose of 30 mg dose as adjuncts to intravenous regional anaesthesia. But there are no studies to compare pethidine of 30 mg dose to any of the NonSteroidal Anti-Inflammatory agents.

Methods

In a prospective, randomized, double blind study, 45 patients were given intravenous regional anaesthesia with either lignocaine alone or lignocaine with pethidine 30 mg or lignocaine with ketprofen 100 mg. Fentanyl was used as rescue analgesic during surgery. For the first 6 h of postoperative period analgesia was provided by fentanyl injection and between 6 and 24 h analgesia was provided by diclofenac tablets. Visual analogue scores for pain and consumption of fentanyl and diclofenac were compared.

Results

The block was inadequate for one case each in lignocaine group and pethidine group, so general anaesthesia was provided. Time for the first dose of fentanyl required for postoperative analgesia was significantly more in pethidine and ketoprofen groups compared to lignocaine group (156.7 ± 148.8 and 153.0 ± 106.0 vs. 52.1 ± 52.4 min respectively). Total fentanyl consumption in first 6 h of postoperative period was less in pethidine and ketoprofen groups compared to lignocaine group (37.5 ± 29.0 mcg, 38.3 ± 20.8 mcg vs. 64.2 ± 27.2 mcg respectively). Consumption of diclofenac tablets was 2.4 ± 0.7, 2.5 ± 0.5 and 2.0 ± 0.7 in the control, pethidine and ketoprofen group respectively, which was statistically not significant. Side effects were not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusion

Both pethidine and ketoprofen are equally effective in providing postoperative analgesia up to 6 h, without significant difference in the side effects and none of the adjuncts provide significant analgesia after 6 h.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哌替啶和酮洛芬作为利多卡因佐剂在静脉区域麻醉中的随机、双盲比较研究
背景与目的回顾了静脉局部麻醉的所有辅助药物,结论是非甾体类抗炎药和哌啶作为静脉局部麻醉的辅助药物,剂量为30mg。但是没有研究将30毫克剂量的哌替啶与任何非甾体抗炎药进行比较。方法在前瞻性、随机、双盲研究中,45例患者分别给予单独利多卡因或利多卡因与哌啶30 mg或利多卡因与酮洛芬100 mg静脉局部麻醉。术中使用芬太尼作为抢救镇痛药。术后6 h采用芬太尼注射液镇痛,6 ~ 24 h采用双氯芬酸片镇痛。比较芬太尼和双氯芬酸的疼痛和消耗的视觉模拟评分。结果利多卡因组和哌啶组各1例阻滞不足,给予全身麻醉。哌啶组和酮洛芬组术后镇痛所需芬太尼首次用药时间(156.7±148.8 min)和153.0±106.0 min(52.1±52.4 min)明显长于利多卡因组。术后前6 h芬太尼总消耗量哌啶组和酮洛芬组低于利多卡因组(分别为37.5±29.0 mcg、38.3±20.8 mcg和64.2±27.2 mcg)。对照组、哌啶组、酮洛芬组双氯芬酸片用量分别为2.4±0.7、2.5±0.5、2.0±0.7,差异无统计学意义。两组间的副作用无显著差异。结论哌替啶与酮洛芬对术后6 h的镇痛效果相同,副作用无显著性差异,6 h后两种药物均无明显镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manejo anestésico para la cirugía de atresia de esófago en un neonato con síndrome de Goldenhar Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen ecoguiado-revisión sistemática Comparación de los efectos profilácticos del droperidol y del ondansetrón sobre el prurito provocado por la morfina subaracnoidea Endarterectomía carotídea: revisión de 10 años de práctica de la anestesia general y locorregional en un hospital terciario en Portugal Efecto de la rotación de la cabeza en la presión intraocular en decúbito ventral: estudio aleatorizado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1