Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen ecoguiado-revisión sistemática

Javier Ripollés , Sandra Marmaña Mezquita , Alfredo Abad , José Calvo
{"title":"Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen ecoguiado-revisión sistemática","authors":"Javier Ripollés ,&nbsp;Sandra Marmaña Mezquita ,&nbsp;Alfredo Abad ,&nbsp;José Calvo","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.10.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The transverse abdominal plan blockade (TAP) is a block of abdominal wall that has diffused rapidly in the clinical practice as part of a multimodal analgesia for abdominal surgery. The performance of the ultrasound-guided technique has allowed the lowering of potential complications, as well as new approaches that according to the descriptions carried out and the prospective studies would make it possible to utilize the TAP in different surgical interventions; however, the results obtained in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are inconsistent.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To prepare a systematic review aiming to determine the efficacy of the ultrasound-guided TAP for different surgical interventions, as well as the indications according to the approaches and their influences.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two research approaches, one manual, and the other in Pubmed returned 28 RCT where intervention with ultrasound-guided TAP were performed to compare the analgesic efficacy in contrast to another technique in adults, published between 2007 and October 2013, in English or Spanish, with Jadad score &gt;1, according to the inclusion criteria for this review. The authors analyzed independently all the RCT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The TAP have been shown to be an effective technique in colorectal surgery, cesarean section, cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, appendectomy, donor nephrectomy, retropubic prostatectomy, and bariatric surgery. However, the data found in RCT are not conclusive, and as a result, it is necessary to develop new and well designed RCT, with enough statistical power to compare different approaches, drugs, doses, and volumes for the same intervention, aiming to answer the current questions and their effects in the habitual clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"65 4","pages":"Pages 255-280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.10.015","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496314000178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

The transverse abdominal plan blockade (TAP) is a block of abdominal wall that has diffused rapidly in the clinical practice as part of a multimodal analgesia for abdominal surgery. The performance of the ultrasound-guided technique has allowed the lowering of potential complications, as well as new approaches that according to the descriptions carried out and the prospective studies would make it possible to utilize the TAP in different surgical interventions; however, the results obtained in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are inconsistent.

Objectives

To prepare a systematic review aiming to determine the efficacy of the ultrasound-guided TAP for different surgical interventions, as well as the indications according to the approaches and their influences.

Methods

Two research approaches, one manual, and the other in Pubmed returned 28 RCT where intervention with ultrasound-guided TAP were performed to compare the analgesic efficacy in contrast to another technique in adults, published between 2007 and October 2013, in English or Spanish, with Jadad score >1, according to the inclusion criteria for this review. The authors analyzed independently all the RCT.

Conclusions

The TAP have been shown to be an effective technique in colorectal surgery, cesarean section, cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, appendectomy, donor nephrectomy, retropubic prostatectomy, and bariatric surgery. However, the data found in RCT are not conclusive, and as a result, it is necessary to develop new and well designed RCT, with enough statistical power to compare different approaches, drugs, doses, and volumes for the same intervention, aiming to answer the current questions and their effects in the habitual clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导腹部横平面阻滞的镇痛效果-系统综述
背景横腹平面阻滞术(TAP)是一种腹壁阻滞,在临床实践中作为腹部手术多模式镇痛的一部分已迅速扩散。超声引导技术的性能允许降低潜在的并发症,以及新的方法,根据进行的描述和前瞻性研究将使TAP在不同的手术干预中使用成为可能;然而,在随机临床试验(RCTs)中获得的结果不一致。目的探讨超声引导下TAP在不同手术方式下的疗效,以及不同手术方式的适应证及其影响。方法两种研究方法,一种是手册,另一种是Pubmed中返回的28项随机对照试验,其中超声引导下的TAP进行干预,比较与另一种成人技术的镇痛效果,根据本综述的纳入标准,2007年至2013年10月发表的英文或西班牙语,Jadad评分为1。作者独立分析了所有的随机对照试验。结论TAP在结直肠手术、剖宫产、胆囊切除术、子宫切除术、阑尾切除术、供肾切除术、耻骨后前列腺切除术和减肥手术中是一种有效的技术。然而,在RCT中发现的数据并不具有结论性,因此,有必要开发新的和设计良好的RCT,具有足够的统计能力来比较相同干预的不同方法,药物,剂量和体积,旨在回答当前的问题及其在习惯性临床实践中的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manejo anestésico para la cirugía de atresia de esófago en un neonato con síndrome de Goldenhar Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen ecoguiado-revisión sistemática Comparación de los efectos profilácticos del droperidol y del ondansetrón sobre el prurito provocado por la morfina subaracnoidea Endarterectomía carotídea: revisión de 10 años de práctica de la anestesia general y locorregional en un hospital terciario en Portugal Efecto de la rotación de la cabeza en la presión intraocular en decúbito ventral: estudio aleatorizado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1