Evaluación comparativa entre el metaraminol, la fenilefrina y la efedrina en la profilaxis y en el tratamiento de la hipotensión en cesáreas bajo anestesia espinal

Fábio Farias de Aragão , Pedro Wanderley de Aragão , Carlos Alberto de Souza Martins , Natalino Salgado Filho , Elizabeth de Souza Barcelos Barroqueiro
{"title":"Evaluación comparativa entre el metaraminol, la fenilefrina y la efedrina en la profilaxis y en el tratamiento de la hipotensión en cesáreas bajo anestesia espinal","authors":"Fábio Farias de Aragão ,&nbsp;Pedro Wanderley de Aragão ,&nbsp;Carlos Alberto de Souza Martins ,&nbsp;Natalino Salgado Filho ,&nbsp;Elizabeth de Souza Barcelos Barroqueiro","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Maternal hypotension is a common complication after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section, with deleterious effects on the fetus and mother. Among the strategies aimed at minimizing the effects of hypotension, vasopressor administration is the most efficient. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of phenylephrine, metaraminol, and ephedrine in the prevention and treatment of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Ninety pregnant women, not in labor, undergoing cesarean section were randomized into three groups to receive a bolus followed by continuous infusion of vasopressor as follows: phenylephrine group (50 μg + 50 μg/min); metaraminol group (0.25 mg + 0.25 mg/min); ephedrine group (4 mg + 4 mg/min). Infusion dose was doubled when systolic blood pressure decreased to 80% of baseline and a bolus was given when systolic blood pressure decreased below 80%. The infusion dose was divided in half when systolic blood pressure increased to 120% and was stopped when it became higher. The incidence of hypotension, nausea and vomiting, reactive hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, Apgar scores, and arterial cord blood gases were assessed at the 1st and 5th minutes.</p><p>There was no difference in the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, reactive hypertension, infusion discontinuation, atropine administration or Apgar scores. Rescue boluses were higher only in the ephedrine group compared to metaraminol group. The incidence of nausea and vomiting and fetal acidosis were greater in the ephedrine group. The three drugs were effective in preventing hypotension; however, fetal effects were more frequent in the ephedrine group, although transient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"64 5","pages":"Pages 299-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.07.015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496314000749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maternal hypotension is a common complication after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section, with deleterious effects on the fetus and mother. Among the strategies aimed at minimizing the effects of hypotension, vasopressor administration is the most efficient. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of phenylephrine, metaraminol, and ephedrine in the prevention and treatment of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Ninety pregnant women, not in labor, undergoing cesarean section were randomized into three groups to receive a bolus followed by continuous infusion of vasopressor as follows: phenylephrine group (50 μg + 50 μg/min); metaraminol group (0.25 mg + 0.25 mg/min); ephedrine group (4 mg + 4 mg/min). Infusion dose was doubled when systolic blood pressure decreased to 80% of baseline and a bolus was given when systolic blood pressure decreased below 80%. The infusion dose was divided in half when systolic blood pressure increased to 120% and was stopped when it became higher. The incidence of hypotension, nausea and vomiting, reactive hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, Apgar scores, and arterial cord blood gases were assessed at the 1st and 5th minutes.

There was no difference in the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, reactive hypertension, infusion discontinuation, atropine administration or Apgar scores. Rescue boluses were higher only in the ephedrine group compared to metaraminol group. The incidence of nausea and vomiting and fetal acidosis were greater in the ephedrine group. The three drugs were effective in preventing hypotension; however, fetal effects were more frequent in the ephedrine group, although transient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲氨基酚、苯肾上腺素和麻黄素在脊柱麻醉下剖腹产低血压预防和治疗中的比较评价
产妇低血压是剖宫产脊髓麻醉术后常见的并发症,对胎儿和母亲都有不良影响。在降低低血压影响的策略中,血管加压药是最有效的。本研究的目的是比较苯肾上腺素、甲氨醇和麻黄碱预防和治疗剖宫产术后腰麻低血压的疗效。选择剖宫产术中未分娩的孕妇90例,随机分为3组,分别给予大剂量后持续输注抗利尿激素:苯肾上腺素组(50 μg + 50 μg/min);甲氨醇组(0.25 mg + 0.25 mg/min);麻黄素组(4mg + 4mg /min)。当收缩压降至基线的80%时,输注剂量加倍,当收缩压降至80%以下时,给予一剂。当收缩压升高至120%时,将输注剂量减半,当收缩压升高时停止输注。在第1分钟和第5分钟评估低血压、恶心呕吐、反应性高血压、心动过缓、心动过速、Apgar评分和动脉脐带血气体的发生率。在低血压、心动过缓、反应性高血压、停药、阿托品给药或Apgar评分的发生率方面没有差异。只有麻黄碱组的抢救量高于甲氨酚组。麻黄碱组恶心呕吐和胎儿酸中毒发生率较高。3种药物均能有效预防低血压;然而,对胎儿的影响在麻黄碱组更常见,尽管是短暂的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manejo anestésico para la cirugía de atresia de esófago en un neonato con síndrome de Goldenhar Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen ecoguiado-revisión sistemática Comparación de los efectos profilácticos del droperidol y del ondansetrón sobre el prurito provocado por la morfina subaracnoidea Endarterectomía carotídea: revisión de 10 años de práctica de la anestesia general y locorregional en un hospital terciario en Portugal Efecto de la rotación de la cabeza en la presión intraocular en decúbito ventral: estudio aleatorizado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1