Frecuencia de colonización y bacterias aisladas de punta de catéter epidural implantado para analgesia postoperatoria

Débora Miranda Diogo Stabille , Augusto Diogo Filho , Beatriz Lemos da Silva Mandim , Lúcio Borges de Araújo , Priscila Miranda Diogo Mesquita , Miguel Tanús Jorge
{"title":"Frecuencia de colonización y bacterias aisladas de punta de catéter epidural implantado para analgesia postoperatoria","authors":"Débora Miranda Diogo Stabille ,&nbsp;Augusto Diogo Filho ,&nbsp;Beatriz Lemos da Silva Mandim ,&nbsp;Lúcio Borges de Araújo ,&nbsp;Priscila Miranda Diogo Mesquita ,&nbsp;Miguel Tanús Jorge","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The increased use of epidural analgesia with catheter leads to the need to demonstrate the safety of this method and know the incidence of catheter colonization, inserted postoperatively for epidural analgesia, and the bacteria responsible for this colonization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From November 2011 to April 2012, patients electively operated and maintained under epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia were evaluated. The catheter tip was collected for semiquantitative and qualitative microbiological analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 68 cultured catheters, 6 tips (8.8%) had positive cultures. No patient had superficial or deep infection. The mean duration of catheter use was 43.45<!--> <!-->h (18-118) (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.0894). The type of surgery (contaminated or uncontaminated), physical status of patients, and surgical time showed no relation with the colonization of catheters. Microorganisms isolated from the catheter tip were <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> and <em>Sphingomonas paucimobilis</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Postoperative epidural catheter analgesia, under this study conditions, was found to be low risk for bacterial colonization in patients at surgical wards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"65 3","pages":"Pages 200-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.05.006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496315000197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The increased use of epidural analgesia with catheter leads to the need to demonstrate the safety of this method and know the incidence of catheter colonization, inserted postoperatively for epidural analgesia, and the bacteria responsible for this colonization.

Methods

From November 2011 to April 2012, patients electively operated and maintained under epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia were evaluated. The catheter tip was collected for semiquantitative and qualitative microbiological analysis.

Results

Of 68 cultured catheters, 6 tips (8.8%) had positive cultures. No patient had superficial or deep infection. The mean duration of catheter use was 43.45 h (18-118) (P = .0894). The type of surgery (contaminated or uncontaminated), physical status of patients, and surgical time showed no relation with the colonization of catheters. Microorganisms isolated from the catheter tip were Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Sphingomonas paucimobilis.

Conclusion

Postoperative epidural catheter analgesia, under this study conditions, was found to be low risk for bacterial colonization in patients at surgical wards.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植入硬膜外导管用于术后镇痛的定植频率和分离细菌
目的:随着硬膜外置管镇痛使用的增加,需要证明这种方法的安全性,并了解硬膜外置管术后定殖的发生率,以及导致这种定殖的细菌。方法对2011年11月至2012年4月择期硬膜外置管维持患者术后镇痛进行评价。收集导管尖端进行半定量和定性微生物学分析。结果68根培养导管中6根(8.8%)培养阳性。无患者发生浅表或深部感染。平均导管使用时间为43.45 h (18-118) (P = .0894)。手术类型(污染或未污染)、患者身体状况和手术时间与导管定植无关。从导管尖端分离到的微生物有金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和少动鞘单胞菌。结论在本研究条件下,外科病房患者术后硬膜外导管镇痛的细菌定植风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manejo anestésico para la cirugía de atresia de esófago en un neonato con síndrome de Goldenhar Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen ecoguiado-revisión sistemática Comparación de los efectos profilácticos del droperidol y del ondansetrón sobre el prurito provocado por la morfina subaracnoidea Endarterectomía carotídea: revisión de 10 años de práctica de la anestesia general y locorregional en un hospital terciario en Portugal Efecto de la rotación de la cabeza en la presión intraocular en decúbito ventral: estudio aleatorizado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1