Comparación de bloqueo del plexo braquial por vía interescalénica y administración de anestésico local intraarticular en el manejo del dolor en el postoperatorio de cirugía artroscópica del hombro

Recep Aksu , Cihangir Biçer , Ayşe Ülgey , Adnan Bayram , Işın Güneş , Ahmet Güney , Mustafa Denizhan Yıldırım , Günhan Gökahmetoğlu , Karamehmet Yıldız
{"title":"Comparación de bloqueo del plexo braquial por vía interescalénica y administración de anestésico local intraarticular en el manejo del dolor en el postoperatorio de cirugía artroscópica del hombro","authors":"Recep Aksu ,&nbsp;Cihangir Biçer ,&nbsp;Ayşe Ülgey ,&nbsp;Adnan Bayram ,&nbsp;Işın Güneş ,&nbsp;Ahmet Güney ,&nbsp;Mustafa Denizhan Yıldırım ,&nbsp;Günhan Gökahmetoğlu ,&nbsp;Karamehmet Yıldız","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>In this study, the aim was to compare postoperative analgesia effects of the administration of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block and intraarticular bupivacaine carried out with bupivacaine.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In the first group of patients 20<!--> <!-->mL 0.25% bupivacaine and ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISPB) were applied, while 20<!--> <!-->mL 0.25% bupivacaine was given vía intraarticular (IA) administration to the second group patients after surgery. Patients in the third group were considered the control group and no block was performed. Patient-controlled analgesia with morphine was used in all three groups for postoperative analgesia.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the ISPB group, morphine consumption in the periods between 0-4, 6-12 and 12-24 postoperative hours and total consumption within 24<!--> <!-->h was lower than in the other 2 groups. Morphine consumption in the IA group was lower than in the control group in the period from 0-6<!--> <!-->h and the same was true for total morphine consumption in 24<!--> <!-->h. Postoperative VASr scores in the ISPB group were lower than both of the other groups in the first 2<!--> <!-->h and lower than the control group in the 4th and 6th<!--> <!-->h (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.05). In the IA group, VASr and VASm scores in the 2nd, 4th and 6th<!--> <!-->h were lower than in the control group (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ISPBl plexus block was found to be more effective than intraarticular local anesthetic injection for postoperative analgesia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"65 3","pages":"Pages 222-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.06.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S225549631500015X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

In this study, the aim was to compare postoperative analgesia effects of the administration of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block and intraarticular bupivacaine carried out with bupivacaine.

Methods

In the first group of patients 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine and ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISPB) were applied, while 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine was given vía intraarticular (IA) administration to the second group patients after surgery. Patients in the third group were considered the control group and no block was performed. Patient-controlled analgesia with morphine was used in all three groups for postoperative analgesia.

Results

In the ISPB group, morphine consumption in the periods between 0-4, 6-12 and 12-24 postoperative hours and total consumption within 24 h was lower than in the other 2 groups. Morphine consumption in the IA group was lower than in the control group in the period from 0-6 h and the same was true for total morphine consumption in 24 h. Postoperative VASr scores in the ISPB group were lower than both of the other groups in the first 2 h and lower than the control group in the 4th and 6th h (P < .05). In the IA group, VASr and VASm scores in the 2nd, 4th and 6th h were lower than in the control group (P < .05).

Conclusion

ISPBl plexus block was found to be more effective than intraarticular local anesthetic injection for postoperative analgesia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关节镜肩关节手术术后疼痛管理中关节间路臂丛阻滞与关节内局部麻醉的比较
背景与目的本研究旨在比较超声引导下斜角肌间臂丛阻滞与布比卡因关节内阻滞的术后镇痛效果。方法第一组患者术后给予0.25%布比卡因20 mL,超声引导下斜角肌间臂丛阻滞(ISPB),第二组患者术后给予0.25%布比卡因20 mL vía关节内(IA)给药。第三组为对照组,不进行阻滞治疗。三组患者术后均采用吗啡自控镇痛。结果ISPB组术后0 ~ 4、6 ~ 12、12 ~ 24 h吗啡用量及24 h内吗啡总用量均低于其他2组。IA组0 ~ 6 h吗啡用量低于对照组,24 h吗啡总用量低于对照组。ISPB组术后VASr评分在前2 h低于其他两组,在第4、6 h低于对照组(P <. 05)。IA组第2、4、6 h VASr、VASm评分均低于对照组(P <. 05)。结论ispbl神经丛阻滞比关节内局麻注射更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manejo anestésico para la cirugía de atresia de esófago en un neonato con síndrome de Goldenhar Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen ecoguiado-revisión sistemática Comparación de los efectos profilácticos del droperidol y del ondansetrón sobre el prurito provocado por la morfina subaracnoidea Endarterectomía carotídea: revisión de 10 años de práctica de la anestesia general y locorregional en un hospital terciario en Portugal Efecto de la rotación de la cabeza en la presión intraocular en decúbito ventral: estudio aleatorizado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1