Estudio comparativo entre inducción rápida y lenta de propofol en infusión objetivo-controlada: concentración de propofol prevista en la región de acción. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado

Ricardo Francisco Simoni , Luiz Eduardo de Paula Gomes Miziara , Luis Otávio Esteves , Diógenes de Oliveira Silva , Cristina Alves Ribeiro , Mariana Oki Smith , Leonardo Ferreira de Paula , Luis Henrique Cangiani
{"title":"Estudio comparativo entre inducción rápida y lenta de propofol en infusión objetivo-controlada: concentración de propofol prevista en la región de acción. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado","authors":"Ricardo Francisco Simoni ,&nbsp;Luiz Eduardo de Paula Gomes Miziara ,&nbsp;Luis Otávio Esteves ,&nbsp;Diógenes de Oliveira Silva ,&nbsp;Cristina Alves Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Mariana Oki Smith ,&nbsp;Leonardo Ferreira de Paula ,&nbsp;Luis Henrique Cangiani","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>Studies have shown that rate of propofol infusion may influence the predicted propofol concentration at the effect site (Es). The aim of this study was to evaluate the Es predicted by the Marsh pharmacokinetic model (ke0 0.26<!--> <!-->min<sup>−1</sup>) in loss of consciousness during fast or slow induction.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The study included 28 patients randomly divided into 2 equal groups. In slow induction group, target-controlled infusion of propofol with plasma, Marsh pharmacokinetic model (ke0 0.26<!--> <!-->min<sup>−1</sup>) with target concentration (Tc) at 2.0<!--> <!-->μg.mL<sup>−1</sup> were administered. When the predicted propofol concentration at the Es reached half of Es value, Es was increased to previous Es +1<!--> <!-->μg.mL<sup>−1</sup>, successively, until loss of consciousness. In rapid induction group, patients were induced with target-controlled infusion of propofol with plasma (6.0<!--> <!-->μg.ml<sup>−1</sup>) at Es, and waited until loss of consciousness.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In rapid induction group, Es for loss of consciousness was significantly lower compared to slow induction group (1.67<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.76 and 2.50<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.56<!--> <!-->μg.mL<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The predicted propofol concentration at the Es for loss of consciousness is different for rapid induction and slow induction, even with the same pharmacokinetic model of propofol and the same balance constant between plasma and effect site.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"65 2","pages":"Pages 99-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.12.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S225549631400107X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Studies have shown that rate of propofol infusion may influence the predicted propofol concentration at the effect site (Es). The aim of this study was to evaluate the Es predicted by the Marsh pharmacokinetic model (ke0 0.26 min−1) in loss of consciousness during fast or slow induction.

Method

The study included 28 patients randomly divided into 2 equal groups. In slow induction group, target-controlled infusion of propofol with plasma, Marsh pharmacokinetic model (ke0 0.26 min−1) with target concentration (Tc) at 2.0 μg.mL−1 were administered. When the predicted propofol concentration at the Es reached half of Es value, Es was increased to previous Es +1 μg.mL−1, successively, until loss of consciousness. In rapid induction group, patients were induced with target-controlled infusion of propofol with plasma (6.0 μg.ml−1) at Es, and waited until loss of consciousness.

Results

In rapid induction group, Es for loss of consciousness was significantly lower compared to slow induction group (1.67 ± 0.76 and 2.50 ± 0.56 μg.mL−1, respectively, P = 0.004).

Conclusion

The predicted propofol concentration at the Es for loss of consciousness is different for rapid induction and slow induction, even with the same pharmacokinetic model of propofol and the same balance constant between plasma and effect site.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目标控制输注中异丙酚快速和缓慢诱导的比较研究:作用区域异丙酚浓度预测。随机临床试验
背景与目的研究表明,异丙酚输注速率可能影响作用部位的预测异丙酚浓度(Es)。本研究的目的是评估Marsh药代动力学模型(ke0 0.26 min−1)预测的快速或缓慢诱导时意识丧失的Es。方法28例患者随机分为2组。慢诱导组,靶控血浆输注异丙酚,建立Marsh药代动力学模型(ke0 0.26 min−1),靶浓度(Tc) 2.0 μg。给药mL−1。当Es处的预测异丙酚浓度达到Es值的一半时,Es增加到原来的Es +1 μg。mL−1,连续,直到失去意识。快速诱导组在Es时靶控血浆输注异丙酚(6.0 μg.ml−1)诱导,等待至意识丧失。结果快速诱导组意识丧失e值显著低于慢速诱导组(1.67±0.76、2.50±0.56 μg)。mL−1,P = 0.004)。结论在异丙酚药动学模型相同、血浆与作用部位平衡常数相同的情况下,快速诱导与慢速诱导对意识丧失的e级预测异丙酚浓度不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manejo anestésico para la cirugía de atresia de esófago en un neonato con síndrome de Goldenhar Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen ecoguiado-revisión sistemática Comparación de los efectos profilácticos del droperidol y del ondansetrón sobre el prurito provocado por la morfina subaracnoidea Endarterectomía carotídea: revisión de 10 años de práctica de la anestesia general y locorregional en un hospital terciario en Portugal Efecto de la rotación de la cabeza en la presión intraocular en decúbito ventral: estudio aleatorizado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1