Sadegh Karimpouli , Pejman Tahmasebi , Erik H. Saenger
{"title":"Ultrasonic prediction of crack density using machine learning: A numerical investigation","authors":"Sadegh Karimpouli , Pejman Tahmasebi , Erik H. Saenger","doi":"10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cracks are accounted as the most destructive discontinuity in rock, soil, and concrete. Enhancing our knowledge from their properties such as crack distribution, density, and/or aspect ratio is crucial in geo-systems. The most well-known mechanical parameter for such an evaluation is wave velocity through which one can qualitatively or quantitatively characterize the porous media. In small scales, such information is obtained using the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) technique as a non-destructive test. In large-scale geo-systems, however, it is inverted from seismic data. In this paper, we take advantage of the recent advancements in machine learning (ML) for analyzing wave signals and predict rock properties such as crack density (CD) – the number of cracks per unit volume. To this end, we designed numerical models with different CDs and, using the rotated staggered finite-difference grid (RSG) technique, simulated wave propagation. Two ML networks, namely Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), are then used to predict CD values. Results show that, by selecting an optimum value for wavelength to crack length ratio, the accuracy of predictions of test data can reach <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> > 96% with mean square error (MSE) < 25e-4 (normalized values). Overall, we found that: (i) performance of both CNN and LSTM is highly promising, (ii) accuracy of the transmitted signals is slightly higher than the reflected signals, (iii) accuracy of 2D signals is marginally higher than 1D signals, (iv) accuracy of horizontal and vertical component signals are comparable, (v) accuracy of coda signals is less when the whole signals are used. Our results, thus, reveal that the ML methods can provide rapid solutions and estimations for crack density, without the necessity of further modeling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12711,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience frontiers","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 101277"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101277","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987121001419","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Cracks are accounted as the most destructive discontinuity in rock, soil, and concrete. Enhancing our knowledge from their properties such as crack distribution, density, and/or aspect ratio is crucial in geo-systems. The most well-known mechanical parameter for such an evaluation is wave velocity through which one can qualitatively or quantitatively characterize the porous media. In small scales, such information is obtained using the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) technique as a non-destructive test. In large-scale geo-systems, however, it is inverted from seismic data. In this paper, we take advantage of the recent advancements in machine learning (ML) for analyzing wave signals and predict rock properties such as crack density (CD) – the number of cracks per unit volume. To this end, we designed numerical models with different CDs and, using the rotated staggered finite-difference grid (RSG) technique, simulated wave propagation. Two ML networks, namely Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), are then used to predict CD values. Results show that, by selecting an optimum value for wavelength to crack length ratio, the accuracy of predictions of test data can reach R2 > 96% with mean square error (MSE) < 25e-4 (normalized values). Overall, we found that: (i) performance of both CNN and LSTM is highly promising, (ii) accuracy of the transmitted signals is slightly higher than the reflected signals, (iii) accuracy of 2D signals is marginally higher than 1D signals, (iv) accuracy of horizontal and vertical component signals are comparable, (v) accuracy of coda signals is less when the whole signals are used. Our results, thus, reveal that the ML methods can provide rapid solutions and estimations for crack density, without the necessity of further modeling.
Geoscience frontiersEarth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍:
Geoscience Frontiers (GSF) is the Journal of China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. It publishes peer-reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences. GSF covers various research areas including petrology and geochemistry, lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics, global tectonics, economic geology and fuel exploration, geophysics, stratigraphy and paleontology, environmental and engineering geology, astrogeology, and the nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals. The journal aims to bridge innovative, provocative, and challenging concepts and models in these fields, providing insights on correlations and evolution.