Discussion of Segment Disclosure Quantity and Quality under IFRS 8: Determinants and the Effect of Financial Analysts' Earnings Forecast Errors

Giorgio Gotti
{"title":"Discussion of Segment Disclosure Quantity and Quality under IFRS 8: Determinants and the Effect of Financial Analysts' Earnings Forecast Errors","authors":"Giorgio Gotti","doi":"10.1016/j.intacc.2016.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Andre, Filip, and Modovan (2016) explores the characteristics—quality and quantity—of segment disclosures under IFRS 8 and their usefulness to financial analysts in accurately estimating earnings per share (EPS). The authors measure quantity of disclosures as the number of segment-level line items disclosed in financial statements and quality as the cross-segment variation in profitability. The results provide evidence that managers solve the issue of proprietary costs by decreasing either the quantity of disclosure below the level of standards' guidance or the quality of disclosures on operating segments, thus reducing the overall information included in disclosures. Results also show that it is difficult even for a sophisticated group of financial statement users such as financial analysts to fully understand the quality of segment disclosures and that too much disclosure quantity might create a “foggy” environment, where even sophisticated investors can have troubles using disclosed information to forecast earnings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101232,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Accounting","volume":"51 4","pages":"Pages 462-463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.intacc.2016.10.007","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020706316301765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Andre, Filip, and Modovan (2016) explores the characteristics—quality and quantity—of segment disclosures under IFRS 8 and their usefulness to financial analysts in accurately estimating earnings per share (EPS). The authors measure quantity of disclosures as the number of segment-level line items disclosed in financial statements and quality as the cross-segment variation in profitability. The results provide evidence that managers solve the issue of proprietary costs by decreasing either the quantity of disclosure below the level of standards' guidance or the quality of disclosures on operating segments, thus reducing the overall information included in disclosures. Results also show that it is difficult even for a sophisticated group of financial statement users such as financial analysts to fully understand the quality of segment disclosures and that too much disclosure quantity might create a “foggy” environment, where even sophisticated investors can have troubles using disclosed information to forecast earnings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际财务报告准则第8号下分部信息披露的数量和质量探讨:财务分析师盈余预测误差的决定因素和影响
Andre, Filip和Modovan(2016)探讨了IFRS 8下分部披露的特征-质量和数量及其对财务分析师准确估计每股收益(EPS)的有用性。作者将披露的数量衡量为财务报表中披露的部门级行项目的数量,将质量衡量为盈利能力的跨部门变化。研究结果表明,管理者可以通过减少低于准则指导水平的披露数量或减少对经营部门的披露质量来解决专有成本问题,从而减少披露中包含的总体信息。结果还表明,即使是金融分析师等老练的财务报表使用者也很难完全理解分部披露的质量,过多的披露数量可能会造成“模糊”的环境,即使是老练的投资者也可能难以使用披露的信息来预测收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Reporting and the Informativeness of Financial Analysts’ Stock Recommendations Climate-Related Financial Risk: Insights from a Semisystematic Review of the Literature and Implications for Financial Reporting Informal Institutions and Audit Pricing: Cross-Country Evidence of National Culture and Audit Fees Discussion of “Climate-Related Financial Risk: Insights from a Semisystematic Review of the Literature and Implications for Financial Reporting” Choice of Participation Method in Setting International Accounting Standards: Evidence from EFRAG as an Intermediary for Indirect Participation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1