{"title":"An External Evaluator's Perspective on the CEFP","authors":"","doi":"10.1046/j.1523-5394.2001.95112.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79323,"journal":{"name":"Cancer practice","volume":"9 s1","pages":"S72-S77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1523-5394.2001.95112.x","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1523-5394.2001.95112.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
外部评估者对CEFP的看法
作为协作评估研究员项目(CEFP)的外部评估者,作者描述了CEFP模型如何应用于项目自身的评估,并提出了早期的发现,主要基于实施第一年进行的14项研究。研究结果、收益以及设计和实现问题。早期的发现是,CEFP模型的所有基本前提都被证明是可行的。CEFP在美国癌症协会和大学中都得到了好评。CEFP评价促进者、评价教员和评价研究员的角色已由适当的合格人员承担。美国癌症协会的工作人员和志愿者普遍认为CEFP评估是可信和有用的,并且在大多数情况下,他们实际上使用了CEFP评估。评估研究员高度重视CEFP作为一种学习经验,并且令人惊讶的是,许多人从事相关的职业。在CEFP的规划阶段,人们最担心的是美国癌症协会的实际需求与合作伙伴的学术取向之间的冲突,而这种冲突的出现远没有预期的那么严重,这可能是因为CEFP在项目设计中就有谨慎的规定来防范这种冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。