Effective Behavioral Intervention for Adults on the Autism Spectrum: Best Practices in Functional Assessment and Treatment Development.

Christopher J. Manente, James C. Maraventano, R. LaRue, Lara Delmolino, Donna L. Sloan
{"title":"Effective Behavioral Intervention for Adults on the Autism Spectrum: Best Practices in Functional Assessment and Treatment Development.","authors":"Christopher J. Manente, James C. Maraventano, R. LaRue, Lara Delmolino, Donna L. Sloan","doi":"10.1037/H0100687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As individuals with autism age out of the educational system, families and practitioners are faced with a number of challenges, including placement concerns and limited behavioral support. This change in available resources often affects the quality of behavioral intervention available to adults on the autism spectrum. These concerns are highlighted when considering the prevalence of maladaptive behavior in adult populations. While estimates of the prevalence of problem behavior vary considerably, levels of maladaptive behavior tend to be higher for individuals with autism relative to other disorders, and may include aggression, self-injurious behavior, property destruction, ritualistic behavior, disruption, inappropriate vocalization, and pica (among others). It has been estimated that the prevalence of aggressive behavior ranges from 6.4% to 32.0% of cases, self-injurious behavior ranges from 4.4% to 21.0% of cases, and destructive behavior from 2.3% to 19.0% of cases (Holden & Gitlesen, 2004; Lowe, Allen, Jones, Brophy, Moore, & James, 2007). While procedures for assessment and treatment for these kinds of problem behavior are well-established in the behavioral literature, the adult population presents unique challenges for families and care providers. The purpose of the current paper is to review the status of existing issues in functional assessment and treatment development in adult populations diagnosed with autism. In addition, we will review some potential strategies for improving services to this underserved population. Challenges to Functional Assessment and Treatment Development in Adults While assessment and treatment procedures for problem behavior have been well established in the research literature, the representation of adult populations is generally lacking relative to younger populations (Hanley, Iwata & McCord, 2003). There are a number of factors which contribute to this relative dearth in the literature. Legislation. Perhaps the most salient reason for the lack of services (and subsequently, research) in adult populations is that the legislation mandating the use of functional behavioral assessment and functional-based intervention procedures only extend to individuals to age 21. Upon reaching the age of 21, the adult populations are not provided with the same entitlements as their school-age counterparts with regard to \"functional behavioral assessment\" and \"positive behavioral supports.\" Cost of Services. Providing services for adults with autism-spectrum disorders represents a substantial economic expense for families and government agencies (Cimera and Cohan, 2009; Ganz, 2006; Jarbrink, McCrone, Fombonne, Zanden, & Knapp, 2007). Adults with autism are among the most costly individuals with disabilities to serve, second only to those individuals with sensory impairments. It has been estimated that it costs approximately $3.2 million dollars to financially support an autistic person over their lifetime (Ganz, 2006). Considering that it is not uncommon for individuals with autism to live into their sixties (Shavelle and Strauss, 1998), it is clear that care during adulthood represents a sizeable cost. With limited funds available, assessment and treatment practices are more likely to use less thorough models of assessment and treatment which require less time, money and other resources. Lack of Qualified Staff. Another significant challenge to the use of the best available assessment and treatment practices with adult populations is a lack of qualified staff to conduct the assessments. It is often the responsibility of direct care staff to implement comprehensive care plans even though many staff members have little training and/or direct care experience (Sigafoos, Roberts, Couzens, & Caycho, 1992; Wood, Luiselli, & Harchik, 2007). Challenges, such as lack of training/support and fear of injury, may deter otherwise qualified staff from working with this population. …","PeriodicalId":88717,"journal":{"name":"The behavior analyst today","volume":"11 1","pages":"36-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The behavior analyst today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0100687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

As individuals with autism age out of the educational system, families and practitioners are faced with a number of challenges, including placement concerns and limited behavioral support. This change in available resources often affects the quality of behavioral intervention available to adults on the autism spectrum. These concerns are highlighted when considering the prevalence of maladaptive behavior in adult populations. While estimates of the prevalence of problem behavior vary considerably, levels of maladaptive behavior tend to be higher for individuals with autism relative to other disorders, and may include aggression, self-injurious behavior, property destruction, ritualistic behavior, disruption, inappropriate vocalization, and pica (among others). It has been estimated that the prevalence of aggressive behavior ranges from 6.4% to 32.0% of cases, self-injurious behavior ranges from 4.4% to 21.0% of cases, and destructive behavior from 2.3% to 19.0% of cases (Holden & Gitlesen, 2004; Lowe, Allen, Jones, Brophy, Moore, & James, 2007). While procedures for assessment and treatment for these kinds of problem behavior are well-established in the behavioral literature, the adult population presents unique challenges for families and care providers. The purpose of the current paper is to review the status of existing issues in functional assessment and treatment development in adult populations diagnosed with autism. In addition, we will review some potential strategies for improving services to this underserved population. Challenges to Functional Assessment and Treatment Development in Adults While assessment and treatment procedures for problem behavior have been well established in the research literature, the representation of adult populations is generally lacking relative to younger populations (Hanley, Iwata & McCord, 2003). There are a number of factors which contribute to this relative dearth in the literature. Legislation. Perhaps the most salient reason for the lack of services (and subsequently, research) in adult populations is that the legislation mandating the use of functional behavioral assessment and functional-based intervention procedures only extend to individuals to age 21. Upon reaching the age of 21, the adult populations are not provided with the same entitlements as their school-age counterparts with regard to "functional behavioral assessment" and "positive behavioral supports." Cost of Services. Providing services for adults with autism-spectrum disorders represents a substantial economic expense for families and government agencies (Cimera and Cohan, 2009; Ganz, 2006; Jarbrink, McCrone, Fombonne, Zanden, & Knapp, 2007). Adults with autism are among the most costly individuals with disabilities to serve, second only to those individuals with sensory impairments. It has been estimated that it costs approximately $3.2 million dollars to financially support an autistic person over their lifetime (Ganz, 2006). Considering that it is not uncommon for individuals with autism to live into their sixties (Shavelle and Strauss, 1998), it is clear that care during adulthood represents a sizeable cost. With limited funds available, assessment and treatment practices are more likely to use less thorough models of assessment and treatment which require less time, money and other resources. Lack of Qualified Staff. Another significant challenge to the use of the best available assessment and treatment practices with adult populations is a lack of qualified staff to conduct the assessments. It is often the responsibility of direct care staff to implement comprehensive care plans even though many staff members have little training and/or direct care experience (Sigafoos, Roberts, Couzens, & Caycho, 1992; Wood, Luiselli, & Harchik, 2007). Challenges, such as lack of training/support and fear of injury, may deter otherwise qualified staff from working with this population. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人自闭症谱系的有效行为干预:功能评估和治疗发展的最佳实践。
随着自闭症患者脱离教育系统,家庭和从业者面临着许多挑战,包括安置问题和有限的行为支持。这种可用资源的变化常常影响对自闭症成人可用的行为干预的质量。当考虑到成人群体中普遍存在的适应不良行为时,这些问题就显得尤为突出。虽然对问题行为的普遍程度的估计差异很大,但与其他疾病相比,自闭症患者的适应不良行为水平往往更高,可能包括攻击、自残行为、破坏财产、仪式化行为、破坏、不适当的发声和异食癖(等等)。据估计,攻击性行为的患病率在6.4%到32.0%之间,自残行为的患病率在4.4%到21.0%之间,破坏性行为的患病率在2.3%到19.0%之间(Holden & Gitlesen, 2004;Lowe, Allen, Jones, Brophy, Moore, & James, 2007)。虽然这些问题行为的评估和治疗程序在行为文献中已经确立,但成年人对家庭和护理提供者提出了独特的挑战。本文旨在综述成人自闭症患者功能评估和治疗发展中存在的问题。此外,我们将审查一些可能的战略,以改善对这一服务不足人口的服务。虽然问题行为的评估和治疗程序在研究文献中已经很好地建立起来,但相对于年轻人群,成年人群体的代表性普遍不足(Hanley, Iwata & McCord, 2003)。有许多因素导致了文献中的这种相对缺乏。立法。成年人缺乏服务(以及随后的研究)的最显著原因可能是,强制使用功能行为评估和基于功能的干预程序的立法只适用于21岁以下的个人。成年人口在达到21岁时,在“功能行为评估”和“积极行为支持”方面没有获得与学龄人口相同的权利。服务成本。为患有自闭症谱系障碍的成年人提供服务对家庭和政府机构来说是一笔巨大的经济支出(Cimera和Cohan, 2009;甘兹,2006;Jarbrink, McCrone, formbonne, Zanden, & Knapp, 2007)。成年自闭症患者是服务成本最高的残疾人之一,仅次于那些有感觉障碍的人。据估计,在经济上支持一个自闭症患者的一生大约需要320万美元(Ganz, 2006)。考虑到自闭症患者活到60多岁并不罕见(Shavelle和Strauss, 1998),很明显,成年期的护理成本相当大。由于可用资金有限,评估和治疗实践更有可能使用不太彻底的评估和治疗模式,这需要较少的时间、金钱和其他资源。缺乏合格的员工。对成年人使用现有的最佳评估和治疗做法的另一个重大挑战是缺乏合格的工作人员进行评估。实施全面的护理计划通常是直接护理人员的责任,尽管许多工作人员几乎没有受过培训和/或直接护理经验(Sigafoos, Roberts, Couzens, & Caycho, 1992;Wood, Luiselli, & Harchik, 2007)。挑战,如缺乏培训/支持和害怕受伤,可能会阻止其他合格的工作人员与这些人群一起工作。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Functional and morphological maturation of the full-sized and mini-pig corpus luteum by programmed cell death mechanism. Procedural aspects that control discounting rates when using the fill-in-the-blank and multiple-choice methods On the sequential and concurrent presentation of trials establishing prerequisites for emergent relations. Using SAFMEDS and direct instruction to teach the model of hierarchical complexity The zeitgeist of behavior analytic research in the 21st century: A keyword analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1