Building fluent performance: Measuring response rate and multiplying response opportunities.

C. Binder
{"title":"Building fluent performance: Measuring response rate and multiplying response opportunities.","authors":"C. Binder","doi":"10.1037/H0100702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Other articles in this special issue describe state-of-the-art measurement and instructional methodologies that use the tools of precision teaching and specific strategies that have evolved in its application with particular learner populations. The present author has participated in this work from the early 1970's and can cite examples of successful instruction using these methods with learners that span the range from students suffering from severe developmental disabilities in now-defunct institutions to 21st century corporate training with senior sales executives and customer service personnel. Rather than focusing on one or more populations, or on the specific instructional strategies associated with them, the purpose of this article is two-fold: 1) to describe a framework originally articulated in the 1970's for the evolution of precision teaching and \"fluency-based instruction\" (Binder, 1978, 1993) that provides a larger context for understanding other contributions in this field, and 2) to illustrate the elements of that framework with examples of measurement and instructional strategies from a range of different populations. Particularly at this time, when many of our colleagues in behavior analysis have not made contact with the work that led to precision teaching, or with early publications that emerged from that work, it seems worthwhile to establish a broader understanding of what precision teaching and its derivatives have brought to our field, and why. A Framework for Evolving Instructional Technology In the late 1960's and early 1970's, precision teaching involved a small and vibrant community of dedicated Skinnerian behavior analysts, led by Ogden Lindsley, Eric Haughton, and a handful of their colleagues and students. Lindsley (1964,1972) was committed to bringing the power of Skinner's \"method of free operant conditioning\" into the field of education, and this commitment drove the research and development of the time. It was the most pristine translation among behavioral educators and applied behavior analysts of Skinner's methodology and discoveries into education because it preserved without compromise Skinner's sensitive measure of behavior (\"response strength\"), rate of response or behavior frequency As the impact of measuring response rates in instructional procedures with freely emitted behavior became clear (Lindsley, 1992), precision | teachers saw that discrete trial procedures coupled with percentage correct evaluation had the effect of leaving behind what Skinner (Evans, 1968) and others considered to be his most important contribution. With under the influence of Eric Haughton, who referred to \"performance blocks\" of various kinds that prevent acceleration of learned behavior, Binder (1978) framed the evolution of instructional methods in precision teaching as a process of removing \"ceilings\" that obstruct the acceleration of behavior toward useful levels of performance supported by natural contingencies. Four Kinds of Ceilings that Prevent Growth of Skill The four ceilings originally named during the 1970's offer a framework for understanding how using response rate measures in instructional settings led to development of a new technology of teaching. The ceilings are: 1. Measurement-defined ceilings 2. Procedure-imposed ceilings (also called Teacher-imposed ceilings) 3. Deficit-imposed ceilings 4. Handicap-defined ceilings As Binder and his colleagues working in B.H. Barrett's laboratory classroom (Barrett, 1977) removed each ceiling, the next ceiling appeared as a flat data line on standard celeration charts above which students' performance would not accelerate. As each ceiling appeared, the need for changes in materials, procedures and behavior pinpoints become clear. The remainder of this section describes each ceiling with examples from different populations to illustrate underlying principles that drove the evolution of more effective and efficient performance development strategies. …","PeriodicalId":88717,"journal":{"name":"The behavior analyst today","volume":"11 1","pages":"214-225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The behavior analyst today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0100702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Other articles in this special issue describe state-of-the-art measurement and instructional methodologies that use the tools of precision teaching and specific strategies that have evolved in its application with particular learner populations. The present author has participated in this work from the early 1970's and can cite examples of successful instruction using these methods with learners that span the range from students suffering from severe developmental disabilities in now-defunct institutions to 21st century corporate training with senior sales executives and customer service personnel. Rather than focusing on one or more populations, or on the specific instructional strategies associated with them, the purpose of this article is two-fold: 1) to describe a framework originally articulated in the 1970's for the evolution of precision teaching and "fluency-based instruction" (Binder, 1978, 1993) that provides a larger context for understanding other contributions in this field, and 2) to illustrate the elements of that framework with examples of measurement and instructional strategies from a range of different populations. Particularly at this time, when many of our colleagues in behavior analysis have not made contact with the work that led to precision teaching, or with early publications that emerged from that work, it seems worthwhile to establish a broader understanding of what precision teaching and its derivatives have brought to our field, and why. A Framework for Evolving Instructional Technology In the late 1960's and early 1970's, precision teaching involved a small and vibrant community of dedicated Skinnerian behavior analysts, led by Ogden Lindsley, Eric Haughton, and a handful of their colleagues and students. Lindsley (1964,1972) was committed to bringing the power of Skinner's "method of free operant conditioning" into the field of education, and this commitment drove the research and development of the time. It was the most pristine translation among behavioral educators and applied behavior analysts of Skinner's methodology and discoveries into education because it preserved without compromise Skinner's sensitive measure of behavior ("response strength"), rate of response or behavior frequency As the impact of measuring response rates in instructional procedures with freely emitted behavior became clear (Lindsley, 1992), precision | teachers saw that discrete trial procedures coupled with percentage correct evaluation had the effect of leaving behind what Skinner (Evans, 1968) and others considered to be his most important contribution. With under the influence of Eric Haughton, who referred to "performance blocks" of various kinds that prevent acceleration of learned behavior, Binder (1978) framed the evolution of instructional methods in precision teaching as a process of removing "ceilings" that obstruct the acceleration of behavior toward useful levels of performance supported by natural contingencies. Four Kinds of Ceilings that Prevent Growth of Skill The four ceilings originally named during the 1970's offer a framework for understanding how using response rate measures in instructional settings led to development of a new technology of teaching. The ceilings are: 1. Measurement-defined ceilings 2. Procedure-imposed ceilings (also called Teacher-imposed ceilings) 3. Deficit-imposed ceilings 4. Handicap-defined ceilings As Binder and his colleagues working in B.H. Barrett's laboratory classroom (Barrett, 1977) removed each ceiling, the next ceiling appeared as a flat data line on standard celeration charts above which students' performance would not accelerate. As each ceiling appeared, the need for changes in materials, procedures and behavior pinpoints become clear. The remainder of this section describes each ceiling with examples from different populations to illustrate underlying principles that drove the evolution of more effective and efficient performance development strategies. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立流畅的性能:测量响应率并增加响应机会。
本期特刊的其他文章描述了使用精确教学工具的最先进的测量和教学方法,以及在特定学习者群体的应用中发展起来的具体策略。作者从20世纪70年代初就参与了这项工作,他可以举出一些成功的例子,用这些方法对学习者进行指导,从现在已经倒闭的机构中患有严重发育障碍的学生到21世纪的高级销售主管和客户服务人员的企业培训。本文的目的不是关注一个或多个人群,也不是关注与他们相关的具体教学策略,而是有两个方面:1)描述最初在20世纪70年代为精确教学和“基于流利的教学”的演变而提出的框架(Binder, 1978, 1993),该框架为理解该领域的其他贡献提供了更大的背景;2)用一系列不同人群的测量和教学策略的例子来说明该框架的要素。特别是在这个时候,当我们在行为分析领域的许多同事还没有接触到导致精确教学的工作,或者从这项工作中出现的早期出版物时,似乎有必要建立一个更广泛的理解,即精确教学及其衍生物给我们的领域带来了什么,以及为什么。在20世纪60年代末和70年代初,精确教学涉及到一个由Ogden Lindsley, Eric Haughton以及他们的一些同事和学生领导的专注于斯金纳行为分析的小而充满活力的社区。Lindsley(1964,1972)致力于将斯金纳的“自由操作性条件反射法”的力量引入教育领域,这一承诺推动了当时的研究和发展。这是行为教育者和应用行为分析师对斯金纳的方法论和发现的最原始的翻译,因为它保留了斯金纳对行为的敏感测量(“反应强度”),反应率或行为频率。随着测量反应率对自由释放行为的教学过程的影响变得清晰起来(Lindsley, 1992)。教师们看到,离散的试验程序加上正确率评估的效果,使斯金纳(Evans, 1968)等人认为是他最重要的贡献。在埃里克·霍顿(Eric Haughton)提到的各种阻碍习得行为加速的“表现障碍”的影响下,宾德(1978)将精确教学中教学方法的演变框定为一个去除阻碍行为加速到由自然偶然因素支持的有用表现水平的“天花板”的过程。阻碍技能发展的四种天花板这四种天花板最初是在20世纪70年代命名的,它提供了一个框架,用于理解在教学环境中使用反应率测量如何导致一种新的教学技术的发展。天花板是:1。测量定义的天花板程序限制(也叫教师限制)赤字上限。当宾德和他的同事在B.H.巴雷特的实验室教室(巴雷特,1977)拆除每一个天花板时,下一个天花板在标准的加速图上显示为一条平坦的数据线,超过这条线学生的表现就不会加速。随着每个天花板的出现,对材料、程序和行为的改变的需求变得清晰起来。本节的其余部分将使用来自不同人群的示例来描述每个上限,以说明推动更有效和高效的性能开发策略演变的基本原则。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Functional and morphological maturation of the full-sized and mini-pig corpus luteum by programmed cell death mechanism. Procedural aspects that control discounting rates when using the fill-in-the-blank and multiple-choice methods On the sequential and concurrent presentation of trials establishing prerequisites for emergent relations. Using SAFMEDS and direct instruction to teach the model of hierarchical complexity The zeitgeist of behavior analytic research in the 21st century: A keyword analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1