下载PDF
{"title":"Cinnamon and Elephants: Sri Lanka and the Netherlands from 1600","authors":"Guido van Meersbergen","doi":"10.1080/00253359.2017.1312155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"aspect, then, this is also a study of maritime ethnography that has many comparisons to similar studies composed by Rieth’s nearcontemporary, Professor Seán McGrail. The book provides a French–English glossary of technical terminology that might be of assistance to readers, although it would benefit from being larger. Its main body consists of nine chapters, along with an introduction and conclusion, and these chapters are roughly divided into two sections. The first three chapters outline the theory and methods used for understanding wreckages. Each chapter thereafter considers shipbuilding within a certain geographical area, beginning with Scandinavia then moving across northern Europe and finishing with the Mediterranean. In doing so, it also traces the development of archaeo logical advancements from clinker to carvel technology. Nevertheless, this book avoids becoming a simple discourse on the design of ship architecture recovered from wrecks, and instead considers medieval architecture in relation to its geohistorical context. With this in mind, Rieth’s latest work has much to admire and will be of some interest to maritime historians in their own disciplines, as well as students of maritime archaeology in general. This study is perhaps no substitute for McGrail’s comprehensive contributions to the subject, although it does not intentionally aim to be, for it does focus on a more concentrated period. It is nevertheless a commendable revisionary study that offers a good insight into maritime archaeology and should be of interest to both the general reader and student. BenJAmin W. d. redding university of WArWick http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2017.1312154 © The Society for Nautical Research","PeriodicalId":44123,"journal":{"name":"MARINERS MIRROR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00253359.2017.1312155","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MARINERS MIRROR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2017.1312155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
引用
批量引用
肉桂和大象:1600年的斯里兰卡和荷兰
因此,这也是一项海洋民族志研究,与里思的近同时代人Seán McGrail教授所做的类似研究有许多比较。这本书提供了一个法语-英语技术术语表,可能对读者有帮助,虽然它会受益于更大。正文共九章,包括导言和结语,这些章节大致分为两节。前三章概述了理解沉船事故的理论和方法。此后的每一章都考虑了特定地理区域内的造船业,从斯堪的纳维亚开始,然后跨越北欧,最后以地中海结束。在此过程中,它还追溯了从熟料到卡维尔技术的考古进步的发展。然而,这本书避免成为一个简单的论述从沉船中恢复的船舶建筑设计,而是考虑中世纪建筑与其地理历史背景的关系。考虑到这一点,Rieth的最新作品有很多值得赞赏的地方,并且会引起他们自己学科的海洋历史学家以及一般海洋考古学学生的一些兴趣。这项研究也许无法取代McGrail对这一主题的全面贡献,尽管它并非有意为之,因为它确实关注了一个更集中的时期。然而,这是一个值得称赞的修订研究,提供了一个很好的洞察海洋考古学,应该感兴趣的普通读者和学生。本杰明·w·d·雷丁华威大学http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2017.1312154©航海研究学会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。