Measuring warmth and competence at inter-group, interpersonal and individual levels / Medición de la cordialidad y la competencia en los niveles intergrupal, interindividual e individual

Pub Date : 2015-09-02 DOI:10.1080/02134748.2015.1065084
J. Aragonés, L. Poggio, Verónica Sevillano, R. Pérez-López, M. Sánchez-Bernardos
{"title":"Measuring warmth and competence at inter-group, interpersonal and individual levels / Medición de la cordialidad y la competencia en los niveles intergrupal, interindividual e individual","authors":"J. Aragonés, L. Poggio, Verónica Sevillano, R. Pérez-López, M. Sánchez-Bernardos","doi":"10.1080/02134748.2015.1065084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Warmth and competence are universal dimensions of social perception that articulate the perception of other individuals and social groups. However, there are no scales that have systematically been used in psychosocial research. The purpose of this study is to construct two scales, one on warmth and another on competence, which could be used at the inter-group, interpersonal and individual levels. To accomplish this, we performed two studies. In Study I (N = 578 students and N = 540 general population), we tested the scales at the intergroup level (immigrant groups and Spaniards), the interpersonal level (people close to the participants) and the individual level (the participants themselves). In Study 2 (N = 184 students), the two scales were tested at an interpersonal level by evaluating 16 public figures. The results of both studies show that both the warmth scale (kind, pleasant, friendly, warm) and the competence scale (competent, effective, skilled, intelligent) achieved a high degree of reliability when reflecting the perception of groups, individuals and oneself.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02134748.2015.1065084","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2015.1065084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Abstract Warmth and competence are universal dimensions of social perception that articulate the perception of other individuals and social groups. However, there are no scales that have systematically been used in psychosocial research. The purpose of this study is to construct two scales, one on warmth and another on competence, which could be used at the inter-group, interpersonal and individual levels. To accomplish this, we performed two studies. In Study I (N = 578 students and N = 540 general population), we tested the scales at the intergroup level (immigrant groups and Spaniards), the interpersonal level (people close to the participants) and the individual level (the participants themselves). In Study 2 (N = 184 students), the two scales were tested at an interpersonal level by evaluating 16 public figures. The results of both studies show that both the warmth scale (kind, pleasant, friendly, warm) and the competence scale (competent, effective, skilled, intelligent) achieved a high degree of reliability when reflecting the perception of groups, individuals and oneself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
在群体间、人际和个人水平上测量温暖和能力/在群体间、人际和个人水平上测量热诚和能力
温暖和能力是社会感知的普遍维度,表达了对其他个人和社会群体的感知。然而,目前还没有在社会心理研究中系统使用的量表。本研究的目的是构建温暖度量表和胜任力量表,分别用于群体间、人际关系和个人层面。为了做到这一点,我们进行了两项研究。在研究I (N = 578名学生和N = 540名一般人群)中,我们在群体间水平(移民群体和西班牙人)、人际水平(与参与者亲近的人)和个人水平(参与者自己)测试了量表。在研究2 (N = 184名学生)中,通过对16位公众人物的评估,在人际关系水平上对这两个量表进行了测试。两项研究的结果都表明,温暖量表(善良、愉快、友好、温暖)和能力量表(胜任、有效、熟练、聪明)在反映群体、个人和自己的感知时都达到了很高的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1