Promoting social equality values to improve judgement of a woman reporting sexism / El fomento de valores relacionados con la igualdad social para mejorar la opinión sobre las mujeres que denuncian discriminación por sexismo

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Revista De Psicologia Social Pub Date : 2016-03-10 DOI:10.1080/02134748.2016.1150054
Sandrine Redersdorff, Jennifer Bastart, Anne-Laure Hernandez, Delphine Martinot
{"title":"Promoting social equality values to improve judgement of a woman reporting sexism / El fomento de valores relacionados con la igualdad social para mejorar la opinión sobre las mujeres que denuncian discriminación por sexismo","authors":"Sandrine Redersdorff, Jennifer Bastart, Anne-Laure Hernandez, Delphine Martinot","doi":"10.1080/02134748.2016.1150054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Previous research has shown that discriminated women blame themselves more than they blame discrimination when meritocracy values are salient. In two studies, we examined whether meritocracy values also influence female observers when they judge a female victim of sexism. Such values were expected to lead them to judge more positively a victim incriminating herself than a victim claiming discrimination. Conversely, social equality values should lead them to judge more positively a victim claiming discrimination. Women who were either feminists or non-feminists (Study 1) or who were exposed to either social equality values or personal merit values (Study 2) had to judge a female victim of sexism who ascribed what happened to discrimination or to her ability. Feminist women and women exposed to social equality judged the female victim more positively when she reported discrimination than when she incriminated herself. The reverse pattern of judgement was observed for non-feminist women and women exposed to meritocracy values. The importance of values is discussed to improve the image of women claiming sexism.","PeriodicalId":42024,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Psicologia Social","volume":"31 1","pages":"193 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02134748.2016.1150054","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Psicologia Social","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2016.1150054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Previous research has shown that discriminated women blame themselves more than they blame discrimination when meritocracy values are salient. In two studies, we examined whether meritocracy values also influence female observers when they judge a female victim of sexism. Such values were expected to lead them to judge more positively a victim incriminating herself than a victim claiming discrimination. Conversely, social equality values should lead them to judge more positively a victim claiming discrimination. Women who were either feminists or non-feminists (Study 1) or who were exposed to either social equality values or personal merit values (Study 2) had to judge a female victim of sexism who ascribed what happened to discrimination or to her ability. Feminist women and women exposed to social equality judged the female victim more positively when she reported discrimination than when she incriminated herself. The reverse pattern of judgement was observed for non-feminist women and women exposed to meritocracy values. The importance of values is discussed to improve the image of women claiming sexism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进社会平等价值观,以改善对举报性别歧视的妇女的判断/促进社会平等价值观,以改善对举报性别歧视的妇女的看法
先前的研究表明,当精英主义价值观突出时,受歧视的女性更多地责怪自己,而不是指责歧视。在两项研究中,我们考察了任人唯贤的价值观是否也会影响女性观察者判断性别歧视的女性受害者。这样的价值观预计会使他们更积极地判断一个自证其罪的受害者,而不是一个声称受到歧视的受害者。相反,社会平等价值观应该引导他们更积极地判断声称受到歧视的受害者。女权主义者或非女权主义者(研究1)或暴露于社会平等价值观或个人价值价值观(研究2)的女性必须判断性别歧视的女性受害者,她将所发生的事情归因于歧视或她的能力。女权主义妇女和接触到社会平等的妇女在女性受害者报告受到歧视时比在她自证其罪时更积极地评价受害者。非女权主义女性和受精英主义价值观影响的女性则表现出相反的判断模式。讨论了价值观的重要性,以改善主张性别歧视的女性形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista De Psicologia Social
Revista De Psicologia Social PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Where you come from matters: familial class background plays a greater role for status-related judgements in France than in the United States ( Tu procedencia importa: la clase social familiar de pertenencia tiene más peso en los juicios sobre el estatus social en Francia que en Estados Unidos ) Socio-economic inequalities of families and their differential impact on types of political participation in the new generation of 24 countries (Desigualdades socio-económicas familiares y su impacto diferencial sobre tipos de participación política de nuevas generaciones en 24 países) Introduction to the special issue: nuances of social class and socioeconomic status (Introducción a este monográfico: los matices del concepto de clase social y del nivel socioeconómico) Why do we vent our emotions and blame others during the coronavirus pandemic? The role of emotional clarity in the United States and South Korea (¿Por qué ventilamos nuestras emociones y culpabilizamos a otras personas durante la pandemia del coronavirus? El rol de la claridad emocional en los Estados Unidos y Corea del Sur) Enhancing social entrepreneurial intentions through outcome expectations, perceived social support and social entrepreneurial self-efficacy: the moderating effects of sustainability orientation (Mejora de las intenciones empresariales sociales a través de las expectativas de resultados, el apoyo social percibido, y la auto-eficacia empresarial social: los efectos moderadores de la orientación a la sostenibilidad)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1