On the Reliable Identification and Effectiveness of Computer-Based, Pop-Up Glossaries in Large-Scale Assessments

IF 1.1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Applied Measurement in Education Pub Date : 2020-07-27 DOI:10.1080/08957347.2020.1789137
D. Cohen, Alesha D. Ballman, F. Rijmen, Jon Cohen
{"title":"On the Reliable Identification and Effectiveness of Computer-Based, Pop-Up Glossaries in Large-Scale Assessments","authors":"D. Cohen, Alesha D. Ballman, F. Rijmen, Jon Cohen","doi":"10.1080/08957347.2020.1789137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Computer-based, pop-up glossaries are perhaps the most promising accommodation aimed at mitigating the influence of linguistic structure and cultural bias on the performance of English Learner (EL) students on statewide assessments. To date, there is no established procedure for identifying the words that require a glossary for EL students that is sufficiently reliable. In the coding procedure, we developed a method to reliably identify words and phrases that require a glossary. The method developed in the coding procedure was used to provide glossaries for the field-test items of statewide English language arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments across grades 3–11 (Current Study). In the Current Study, we assess the effectiveness and influence on construct validity of a pop-up glossary of the words identified in the coding procedure in a large scale, randomized controlled trial. The results demonstrated that generally the pop-up glossary accommodation was effective for both the ELA and mathematics assessments and did not harm the construct being measured.","PeriodicalId":51609,"journal":{"name":"Applied Measurement in Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"378 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08957347.2020.1789137","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Measurement in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2020.1789137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Computer-based, pop-up glossaries are perhaps the most promising accommodation aimed at mitigating the influence of linguistic structure and cultural bias on the performance of English Learner (EL) students on statewide assessments. To date, there is no established procedure for identifying the words that require a glossary for EL students that is sufficiently reliable. In the coding procedure, we developed a method to reliably identify words and phrases that require a glossary. The method developed in the coding procedure was used to provide glossaries for the field-test items of statewide English language arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments across grades 3–11 (Current Study). In the Current Study, we assess the effectiveness and influence on construct validity of a pop-up glossary of the words identified in the coding procedure in a large scale, randomized controlled trial. The results demonstrated that generally the pop-up glossary accommodation was effective for both the ELA and mathematics assessments and did not harm the construct being measured.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论大规模评估中基于计算机的弹出式词汇表的可靠识别和有效性
基于计算机的弹出式词汇表可能是最有前途的适应方式,旨在减轻语言结构和文化偏见对英语学习者(EL)学生在全州评估中的表现的影响。到目前为止,还没有确定的程序来识别需要足够可靠的英语学生词汇表的单词。在编码过程中,我们开发了一种可靠地识别需要词汇表的单词和短语的方法。编码过程中开发的方法用于为全州3-11年级英语语言艺术(ELA)和数学评估的现场测试项目提供词汇表(当前研究)。在本研究中,我们通过一项大规模的随机对照试验,评估了在编码过程中识别的单词的弹出式词汇表的有效性及其对结构效度的影响。结果表明,一般而言,弹出式词汇表适应对ELA和数学评估都是有效的,并且不会损害被测量的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Because interaction between the domains of research and application is critical to the evaluation and improvement of new educational measurement practices, Applied Measurement in Education" prime objective is to improve communication between academicians and practitioners. To help bridge the gap between theory and practice, articles in this journal describe original research studies, innovative strategies for solving educational measurement problems, and integrative reviews of current approaches to contemporary measurement issues. Peer Review Policy: All review papers in this journal have undergone editorial screening and peer review.
期刊最新文献
New Tests of Rater Drift in Trend Scoring Automated Scoring of Short-Answer Questions: A Progress Report Item and Test Characteristic Curves of Rank-2PL Models for Multidimensional Forced-Choice Questionnaires Impact of violating unidimensionality on Rasch calibration for mixed-format tests Can Adaptive Testing Improve Test-Taking Experience? A Case Study on Educational Survey Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1