Specialist speech and language therapists' use and evaluation of visual speech aids.

K. Coventry, J. Clibbens, M. Cooper
{"title":"Specialist speech and language therapists' use and evaluation of visual speech aids.","authors":"K. Coventry, J. Clibbens, M. Cooper","doi":"10.1080/13682829709177104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sixty speech and language therapy service managers and 233 specialist speech and language therapists (SLTs) throughout the UK completed a postal questionnaire which asked for caseload data, patterns of use of visual speech aids (VSAs) and ratings of VSAs on a number of dimensions (in a follow-up to the survey carried out by Coventry, Clibbens, Cooper and Rood, 1997). Information was also elicited about frequency of use of VSAs together with comments relating to the range of applicability of each type of aid. The results revealed that no VSA scored better than average ratings and, in particular, 'Portability' and 'Affordability' scored lowest overall. In addition, no differences were found in ratings of particular VSAs between specialist types. The caseload data reported also confirmed the need to take baserate into account when purchasing and designing VSAs.","PeriodicalId":77120,"journal":{"name":"European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London","volume":"32 3 Spec No 1","pages":"315-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13682829709177104","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13682829709177104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Sixty speech and language therapy service managers and 233 specialist speech and language therapists (SLTs) throughout the UK completed a postal questionnaire which asked for caseload data, patterns of use of visual speech aids (VSAs) and ratings of VSAs on a number of dimensions (in a follow-up to the survey carried out by Coventry, Clibbens, Cooper and Rood, 1997). Information was also elicited about frequency of use of VSAs together with comments relating to the range of applicability of each type of aid. The results revealed that no VSA scored better than average ratings and, in particular, 'Portability' and 'Affordability' scored lowest overall. In addition, no differences were found in ratings of particular VSAs between specialist types. The caseload data reported also confirmed the need to take baserate into account when purchasing and designing VSAs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业言语和语言治疗师对视觉言语辅助工具的使用和评估。
英国60名语言治疗服务经理和233名专业语言治疗师(slt)完成了一份邮寄问卷,询问了案件数量数据,视觉语言辅助工具(VSAs)的使用模式以及VSAs在多个维度上的评级(在考文垂,克里本斯,库珀和鲁德,1997年进行的调查的后续调查中)。还获得了关于使用志愿服务方案的频率的资料,以及关于每一类援助的适用范围的评论。结果显示,没有一个VSA的得分高于平均水平,尤其是“便携性”和“可负担性”的总体得分最低。此外,在专家类型之间的特定vsa评级没有发现差异。报告的病例量数据也证实,在购买和设计vsa时需要考虑basbasate。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcome measures for aphasia therapy: it's not what you do, it's the way that you measure it. Visual speech aids: a British survey of use and evaluation by speech and language therapists. Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners. Early intervention in a case of jargon aphasia: efficacy of language comprehension therapy. In-service training for schools on augmentative and alternative communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1