More harm than good? Multicultural initiatives in human service agencies

C. Hyde
{"title":"More harm than good? Multicultural initiatives in human service agencies","authors":"C. Hyde","doi":"10.1080/15426432.2003.9960324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The social work code of ethics clearly articulates a commitment to social justice, which includes engaging in organizational practices that promote cultural diversity. This article reports findings from a qualitative study on multicultural initiatives in human service agencies. Particular attention is focused on whether efforts were compromised and, if so, what the consequences might be. Interviews with practitioners and consultants, and supporting agency documents, revealed four themes that compromise multicultural initiatives: an absence of vision, piecemeal activities, community neglect and client objectification, and lack of accountability. Implications include resource loss, staff reactivity, and working on borrowed time. Jeopardized multicultural initiatives present serious ethical dilemmas, as they impede the profession's ability to fulfill mandates regarding social justice and diversity. Recommendations are offered for agency personnel in order to engage in more successful multicultural efforts.","PeriodicalId":82727,"journal":{"name":"Social thought","volume":"22 1","pages":"25 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960324","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract The social work code of ethics clearly articulates a commitment to social justice, which includes engaging in organizational practices that promote cultural diversity. This article reports findings from a qualitative study on multicultural initiatives in human service agencies. Particular attention is focused on whether efforts were compromised and, if so, what the consequences might be. Interviews with practitioners and consultants, and supporting agency documents, revealed four themes that compromise multicultural initiatives: an absence of vision, piecemeal activities, community neglect and client objectification, and lack of accountability. Implications include resource loss, staff reactivity, and working on borrowed time. Jeopardized multicultural initiatives present serious ethical dilemmas, as they impede the profession's ability to fulfill mandates regarding social justice and diversity. Recommendations are offered for agency personnel in order to engage in more successful multicultural efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弊大于利?人类服务机构的多元文化倡议
社会工作道德规范明确地阐明了对社会正义的承诺,其中包括参与促进文化多样性的组织实践。本文报告了对人类服务机构的多元文化倡议进行定性研究的结果。特别注意的是努力是否受到损害,如果是,后果可能是什么。对从业者和顾问的采访,以及支持机构文件,揭示了危及多元文化倡议的四个主题:缺乏愿景,零碎的活动,社区忽视和客户物化,以及缺乏问责制。影响包括资源损失、员工反应性和超时工作。受到损害的多元文化倡议带来了严重的道德困境,因为它们阻碍了该专业履行有关社会正义和多样性的任务的能力。为机构人员提供建议,以便更成功地开展多元文化工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The promise of faith‐based social services: Perception versus reality More harm than good? Multicultural initiatives in human service agencies Race, religion, altruism, and the transracial adoption debate: A survey of Catholic, Protestant, and Jewish social workers Being called: Women's paths to service and activism Spirituality and social work: A Norwegian reflection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1