Efficacy of an evidence-based literacy preparation program for young children beginning school

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties Pub Date : 2016-01-02 DOI:10.1080/19404158.2016.1189443
Robyn Wheldall, Katharine Glenn, Sarah Arakelian, Alison Madelaine, Meree Reynolds, K. Wheldall
{"title":"Efficacy of an evidence-based literacy preparation program for young children beginning school","authors":"Robyn Wheldall, Katharine Glenn, Sarah Arakelian, Alison Madelaine, Meree Reynolds, K. Wheldall","doi":"10.1080/19404158.2016.1189443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aimed to provide evidence regarding the efficacy of an early literacy preparation program, PreLit, designed to improve the skills of young Australian children. Participants comprised 240 children in eight schools attending their first year of schooling. Children in the four experimental group schools received instruction in the program while children in the four comparison group schools continued with typical literacy activities in their classrooms. All children were assessed on measures of emergent literacy and language skills prior to and following intervention. It was found that 91% of students were in the bottom quartile for phonological awareness at pre-test. While neither the children nor their schools were randomly allocated to groups, the mean scores for the two groups were very similar at pre-test on all measures. Analyses showed that although the means for the two groups were not statistically different on any of the measures at post-test, significantly fewer students in experimental schools remained in the bottom quartile and more moved into the top quartile for phonological awareness skills, compared with students in the comparison schools. Fine grain analyses, taking into account additional qualitative data about the schools, helped to clarify these findings.","PeriodicalId":44419,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties","volume":"21 1","pages":"21 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19404158.2016.1189443","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2016.1189443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to provide evidence regarding the efficacy of an early literacy preparation program, PreLit, designed to improve the skills of young Australian children. Participants comprised 240 children in eight schools attending their first year of schooling. Children in the four experimental group schools received instruction in the program while children in the four comparison group schools continued with typical literacy activities in their classrooms. All children were assessed on measures of emergent literacy and language skills prior to and following intervention. It was found that 91% of students were in the bottom quartile for phonological awareness at pre-test. While neither the children nor their schools were randomly allocated to groups, the mean scores for the two groups were very similar at pre-test on all measures. Analyses showed that although the means for the two groups were not statistically different on any of the measures at post-test, significantly fewer students in experimental schools remained in the bottom quartile and more moved into the top quartile for phonological awareness skills, compared with students in the comparison schools. Fine grain analyses, taking into account additional qualitative data about the schools, helped to clarify these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以证据为基础的幼儿识字准备计划的成效
摘要本研究旨在为早期识字准备项目PreLit的有效性提供证据,该项目旨在提高澳大利亚儿童的识字技能。参与者包括来自8所学校的240名第一年入学的儿童。四所实验组学校的孩子们接受了该计划的指导,而四所对照组学校的孩子们继续在教室里进行典型的扫盲活动。在干预之前和之后,对所有儿童的读写能力和语言技能进行了评估。结果发现,91%的学生在前测时语音意识处于倒数四分之一。虽然这些孩子和他们的学校都没有被随机分配到不同的小组,但两组在所有测试前的平均得分都非常相似。分析表明,尽管两组学生在测试后的任何测量方法上的平均值没有统计学差异,但与比较学校的学生相比,实验学校的学生在语音意识技能方面处于最低四分位数的人数明显减少,而进入最高四分位数的人数明显增加。细粒度分析,考虑到有关学校的额外定性数据,有助于澄清这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Build it and they will come: responses to the provision of online science of language and reading professional learning “It is more than the average parent goes through”: using the experiences of Australian parents of dyslexic children to draw a distinction between advocacy and allyship The impact of an online training program on pre-service teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about dyslexia An implementation case study for the Response to Intervention (RTI) approach for oral language and reading instruction in the early years of primary school A Linguistic Approach to the Study of Dyslexia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1