Reading syllable-spaced versus word-spaced text in Hmong Daw: breaking up isn’t so hard to do

Q1 Arts and Humanities Writing Systems Research Pub Date : 2016-07-02 DOI:10.1080/17586801.2016.1225562
Seth Vitrano-Wilson
{"title":"Reading syllable-spaced versus word-spaced text in Hmong Daw: breaking up isn’t so hard to do","authors":"Seth Vitrano-Wilson","doi":"10.1080/17586801.2016.1225562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Three experiments were performed to compare people reading word-spaced texts and syllable-spaced texts in Hmong Daw, using the Latin-script orthography known as RPA. The results showed no overall difference in reading speed between the two spacing styles when reading naturally connected stories, but did show advantages to syllable spacing when words were presented in isolation, and for sentences with polysyllabic words that had not appeared previously in the test. The results are contrary to the common untested assumption among linguists involved in orthography development that word spacing is the optimal spacing choice for all languages, and suggest that syllable spacing is a valid option for certain languages in the right sociolinguistic situations. The results also underline the importance of the syllable level for cognitive processing during reading.","PeriodicalId":39225,"journal":{"name":"Writing Systems Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"234 - 256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17586801.2016.1225562","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1225562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

ABSTRACT Three experiments were performed to compare people reading word-spaced texts and syllable-spaced texts in Hmong Daw, using the Latin-script orthography known as RPA. The results showed no overall difference in reading speed between the two spacing styles when reading naturally connected stories, but did show advantages to syllable spacing when words were presented in isolation, and for sentences with polysyllabic words that had not appeared previously in the test. The results are contrary to the common untested assumption among linguists involved in orthography development that word spacing is the optimal spacing choice for all languages, and suggest that syllable spacing is a valid option for certain languages in the right sociolinguistic situations. The results also underline the importance of the syllable level for cognitive processing during reading.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在b白苗语中阅读音节间隔和单词间隔的文本并不难做到
采用RPA拉丁字母正字法对白苗语中单词间隔文本和音节间隔文本进行了三个实验比较。结果显示,在阅读自然连接的故事时,两种间隔方式在阅读速度上没有总体差异,但在单独呈现单词时,以及在测试中没有出现过的多音节单词的句子中,音节间隔方式确实显示出优势。研究结果与参与正字法发展的语言学家普遍的未经检验的假设相反,他们认为单词间距是所有语言的最佳间距选择,并表明音节间距在正确的社会语言学情境下对某些语言是有效的选择。研究结果还强调了音节水平对阅读过程中认知加工的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Writing Systems Research
Writing Systems Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Language ideologies of the transcription system Zhuyin fuhao: a symbol of Taiwanese identity Transcoding number words by bilingual speakers of Arabic: writing multi-digit numbers in a units-decades inverting language Writing between languages: the case of Arabizi Spelling patterns of German 4th graders in French vowels: insights into spelling solutions within and across two alphabetic writing systems Literacy and the language awareness hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1