Sarcopenia and health-related quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 8.9 1区 医学 Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1002/jcsm.13243
Charlotte Beaudart, Céline Demonceau, Jean-Yves Reginster, Médéa Locquet, Matteo Cesari, Alfonso J. Cruz Jentoft, Olivier Bruyère
{"title":"Sarcopenia and health-related quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Charlotte Beaudart,&nbsp;Céline Demonceau,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Reginster,&nbsp;Médéa Locquet,&nbsp;Matteo Cesari,&nbsp;Alfonso J. Cruz Jentoft,&nbsp;Olivier Bruyère","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.13243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The decrease of physical abilities and functional decline that can be caused by musculoskeletal conditions such as sarcopenia, can lead to higher levels of dependency and disability. Therefore, it may influence patient reported outcome measures (PROM), such as the health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide a comprehensive overview of the relationship between sarcopenia and HRQoL. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were followed throughout the whole process of this work. A protocol was previously published on PROSPERO. The electronic databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), EMB Review – ACP Journal Club, EBM Review - Cochrane Central of Register of Controlled Trials and APA PsychInfo were searched until October 2022 for observational studies reporting a HRQoL assessment in both sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic individuals. Study selection and data extraction were carried out by two independent researchers. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effect model, reporting an overall standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic individuals. Study quality was measured using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the strength of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. The search strategy identified 3725 references from which 43 observational studies were eligible and included in this meta-synthesis study. A significantly lower HRQoL was observed for sarcopenic individuals compared with non-sarcopenic ones (SMD −0.76; 95% CI −0.95; −0.57). Significant heterogeneity was associated with the model (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 93%, <i>Q</i> test <i>P</i>-value &lt;0.01). Subgroup analysis showed a higher effect size when using the specific questionnaire SarQoL compared with generic questionnaires (SMD −1.09; 95% CI −1.44; −0.74 with the SarQoL versus −0.49; 95% CI −0.63; −0.36 with generic tools; <i>P</i>-value for interaction &lt;0.01). A greater difference of HRQoL between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic was found for individuals residing in care homes compared with community-dwelling individuals (<i>P</i>-value for interaction &lt;0.001). No differences were found between age groups, diagnostic techniques, and continents/regions. The level of evidence was rated as moderate using the GRADE assessment. This systematic review and meta-analysis combining 43 observational studies shows that HRQoL is significantly reduced in sarcopenic patients. The use of disease-specific HRQoL instruments may better discriminate sarcopenic patients with respect to their quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":"14 3","pages":"1228-1243"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcsm.13243","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13243","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The decrease of physical abilities and functional decline that can be caused by musculoskeletal conditions such as sarcopenia, can lead to higher levels of dependency and disability. Therefore, it may influence patient reported outcome measures (PROM), such as the health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide a comprehensive overview of the relationship between sarcopenia and HRQoL. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were followed throughout the whole process of this work. A protocol was previously published on PROSPERO. The electronic databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), EMB Review – ACP Journal Club, EBM Review - Cochrane Central of Register of Controlled Trials and APA PsychInfo were searched until October 2022 for observational studies reporting a HRQoL assessment in both sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic individuals. Study selection and data extraction were carried out by two independent researchers. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effect model, reporting an overall standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic individuals. Study quality was measured using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the strength of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. The search strategy identified 3725 references from which 43 observational studies were eligible and included in this meta-synthesis study. A significantly lower HRQoL was observed for sarcopenic individuals compared with non-sarcopenic ones (SMD −0.76; 95% CI −0.95; −0.57). Significant heterogeneity was associated with the model (I2 = 93%, Q test P-value <0.01). Subgroup analysis showed a higher effect size when using the specific questionnaire SarQoL compared with generic questionnaires (SMD −1.09; 95% CI −1.44; −0.74 with the SarQoL versus −0.49; 95% CI −0.63; −0.36 with generic tools; P-value for interaction <0.01). A greater difference of HRQoL between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic was found for individuals residing in care homes compared with community-dwelling individuals (P-value for interaction <0.001). No differences were found between age groups, diagnostic techniques, and continents/regions. The level of evidence was rated as moderate using the GRADE assessment. This systematic review and meta-analysis combining 43 observational studies shows that HRQoL is significantly reduced in sarcopenic patients. The use of disease-specific HRQoL instruments may better discriminate sarcopenic patients with respect to their quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨骼肌减少症与健康相关生活质量:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
肌肉骨骼疾病(如肌肉减少症)可能导致身体能力下降和功能衰退,从而导致更高程度的依赖和残疾。因此,它可能会影响患者报告的结果测量(PROM),如与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是提供肌肉减少症与HRQoL之间关系的全面概述。在整个研究过程中都遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)。先前在PROSPERO上发表了一份协议。电子数据库MEDLINE、Scopus、Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED)、EMB Review - ACP Journal Club、EBM Review - Cochrane Central of Register of Controlled Trials和APA PsychInfo被检索到2022年10月,以寻找报告肌肉减少症和非肌肉减少症患者HRQoL评估的观察性研究。研究选择和数据提取由两名独立研究人员进行。使用随机效应模型进行meta分析,报告肌肉减少症和非肌肉减少症患者之间的总体标准化平均差(SMD)及其95%置信区间(CI)。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表测量研究质量,使用建议评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)工具评估证据的强度。检索策略确定了3725篇文献,其中43篇观察性研究符合条件,并纳入本综合研究。肌少症患者的HRQoL明显低于非肌少症患者(SMD - 0.76;95% ci−0.95;−0.57)。模型存在显著异质性(I2 = 93%, Q检验p值<0.01)。亚组分析显示,与通用问卷相比,使用特定问卷SarQoL具有更高的效应量(SMD为−1.09;95% ci−1.44;SarQoL为- 0.74,SarQoL为- 0.49;95% ci−0.63;−0.36使用通用工具;p值为相互作用<0.01)。与居住在社区的个体相比,居住在养老院的肌肉减少症患者和非肌肉减少症患者的HRQoL差异更大(相互作用的p值<0.001)。在年龄组、诊断技术和大洲/地区之间没有发现差异。使用GRADE评估将证据水平评定为中度。本系统综述和荟萃分析结合43项观察性研究表明,肌肉减少症患者的HRQoL显著降低。使用疾病特异性HRQoL仪器可以更好地区分肌肉减少症患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
自引率
12.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia, and Muscle is a prestigious, peer-reviewed international publication committed to disseminating research and clinical insights pertaining to cachexia, sarcopenia, body composition, and the physiological and pathophysiological alterations occurring throughout the lifespan and in various illnesses across the spectrum of life sciences. This journal serves as a valuable resource for physicians, biochemists, biologists, dieticians, pharmacologists, and students alike.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Author Index Abstracts Call for standardization in assessment and reporting of muscle and adipose change using computed tomography analysis in oncology: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1