Compensation-related institutional investor activism – a literature review and integrated analysis of sustainability aspects

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Global Responsibility Pub Date : 2020-09-18 DOI:10.1108/JGR-10-2019-0096
Patrick Velte, Jörn Obermann
{"title":"Compensation-related institutional investor activism – a literature review and integrated analysis of sustainability aspects","authors":"Patrick Velte, Jörn Obermann","doi":"10.1108/JGR-10-2019-0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to analyse whether and how different types of institutional investors influence shareholder proposal initiations, say-on-pay (SOP) votes and management compensation from a sustainability perspective.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBased on the principal-agent theory, the authors conduct a structured literature review and evaluate 40 empirical-quantitative studies on that topic.\n\n\nFindings\nThe traditional assumption of homogeneity within institutional investors, which is in line with the principal–agent theory, has to be questioned. Only special types of investors (e.g. with long-term and non-financial orientations and active institutions) run an intensive monitoring strategy, and thus initiate shareholder proposals, discipline managers by higher SOP dissents and prevent excessive management compensation.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nA detailed analysis of institutional investor types is needed in future empirical analyses. In view of the current debate on climate change policy, future research could analyse in more detail the impact of institutional investor types on proxy voting, SOP and (sustainable) management compensation.\n\n\nPractical implications\nWith regard to the increased shareholder activism and regulations on SOP and management compensation since the 2007/2008 financial crisis, firms should be aware of the monitoring role of institutional investors and should analyse their specific ownership nature (time- and content-driven and as well as range of activity).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of authors’ knowledge, this is the first literature review with a clear focus on institutional investor range and nature, shareholder proposal initiation, SOP and management compensation (reporting) from a sustainability viewpoint. The authors explain the main variables that have been included in research, stress the limitations of this work and offer useful recommendations for future research studies.\n","PeriodicalId":45268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Responsibility","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JGR-10-2019-0096","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-10-2019-0096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to analyse whether and how different types of institutional investors influence shareholder proposal initiations, say-on-pay (SOP) votes and management compensation from a sustainability perspective. Design/methodology/approach Based on the principal-agent theory, the authors conduct a structured literature review and evaluate 40 empirical-quantitative studies on that topic. Findings The traditional assumption of homogeneity within institutional investors, which is in line with the principal–agent theory, has to be questioned. Only special types of investors (e.g. with long-term and non-financial orientations and active institutions) run an intensive monitoring strategy, and thus initiate shareholder proposals, discipline managers by higher SOP dissents and prevent excessive management compensation. Research limitations/implications A detailed analysis of institutional investor types is needed in future empirical analyses. In view of the current debate on climate change policy, future research could analyse in more detail the impact of institutional investor types on proxy voting, SOP and (sustainable) management compensation. Practical implications With regard to the increased shareholder activism and regulations on SOP and management compensation since the 2007/2008 financial crisis, firms should be aware of the monitoring role of institutional investors and should analyse their specific ownership nature (time- and content-driven and as well as range of activity). Originality/value To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is the first literature review with a clear focus on institutional investor range and nature, shareholder proposal initiation, SOP and management compensation (reporting) from a sustainability viewpoint. The authors explain the main variables that have been included in research, stress the limitations of this work and offer useful recommendations for future research studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与薪酬相关的机构投资者行动主义——可持续性方面的文献综述和综合分析
本文旨在从可持续性的角度分析不同类型的机构投资者是否以及如何影响股东提案发起、薪酬话语权(SOP)投票和管理层薪酬。基于委托代理理论,作者进行了结构化的文献综述,并评估了40项关于该主题的实证定量研究。传统的机构投资者内部同质性假设与委托代理理论是一致的,这一假设必须受到质疑。只有特殊类型的投资者(如具有长期和非金融导向和活跃的机构)才会执行密集的监控策略,从而发起股东提案,通过更高的SOP异议来约束管理者,防止管理层薪酬过高。在未来的实证分析中,需要对机构投资者类型进行详细的分析。鉴于当前关于气候变化政策的争论,未来的研究可以更详细地分析机构投资者类型对代理投票、SOP和(可持续)管理层薪酬的影响。自2007/2008年金融危机以来,关于股东激进主义和SOP和管理层薪酬法规的增加,公司应该意识到机构投资者的监督作用,并应分析其具体的所有权性质(时间和内容驱动以及活动范围)。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一次从可持续性的角度明确关注机构投资者的范围和性质、股东提案发起、SOP和管理层薪酬(报告)的文献综述。作者解释了研究中包含的主要变量,强调了这项工作的局限性,并为未来的研究提供了有用的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Impact of dividend policy on corporate social responsibility: the role of board governance mechanism Does tax disclosure in Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)-based sustainability reporting mitigate aggressive tax avoidance? Evidence from a developing country Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development goals: evidence from responsible business leaders Prestige over profit, corporate social responsibility boosts corporate sustainable performance: mediation roles of brand image and brand loyalty Social innovation in working management practices to support facilities management at Malaysian polytechnics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1