COMPARISON OF METHODS TO VERIFY END POINT COOKING TEMPERATURE OF CHANNEL CATFISH (ICTALURUS PUNCTATUS) FILLETS

OLEKSANDR TOKARSKYY, DOUGLAS L. MARSHALL, M. WES SCHILLING, KENNETH O. WILLEFORD
{"title":"COMPARISON OF METHODS TO VERIFY END POINT COOKING TEMPERATURE OF CHANNEL CATFISH (ICTALURUS PUNCTATUS) FILLETS","authors":"OLEKSANDR TOKARSKYY,&nbsp;DOUGLAS L. MARSHALL,&nbsp;M. WES SCHILLING,&nbsp;KENNETH O. WILLEFORD","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00151.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> ABSTRACT</h3>\n \n <p> <i>Cooking to 63C for 15 s remains an important step to ensure safe fish for human consumption. Methods for heat process verification have not been validated for channel catfish (</i>Ictalurus punctatus<i>). The present research compared extractable protein quantification, lactate dehydrogenase, acid phosphatase and catalase activity assays for verification of internal cooking temperature of channel catfish fillets. Ground raw catfish fillet samples (fresh and frozen) were cooked to 55, 60, 62, 63, 64 and 66C. Extractable protein, acid phosphatase and catalase activities decreased as internal cooking temperature increased, but lactate dehydrogenase activity remained unchanged. Samples cooked to 63C had extractable protein concentrations between 9.11 and 10.02 mg/g (95% confidence). Catalase was rapidly inactivated between 55 and 60C and may be suitable for identification of severely undercooked product. Acid phosphatase activity was influenced by method of storage (fresh versus frozen). A method based on total extractable protein appeared to be the most promising for determining the end point cooking temperature of catfish.</i></p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS</h3>\n \n <p>The most precise and reliable method to verify maximum cooking temperature attained during heat treatment of catfish fillets was total extractable protein. This finding may be useful for critical control point verification and may be valuable where claims of foodborne illness associated with catfish consumption are being litigated or investigated. To confirm gross undercooking, an easier test would be to measure catalase activity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50122,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Muscle Foods","volume":"20 3","pages":"325-340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00151.x","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Muscle Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00151.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Cooking to 63C for 15 s remains an important step to ensure safe fish for human consumption. Methods for heat process verification have not been validated for channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). The present research compared extractable protein quantification, lactate dehydrogenase, acid phosphatase and catalase activity assays for verification of internal cooking temperature of channel catfish fillets. Ground raw catfish fillet samples (fresh and frozen) were cooked to 55, 60, 62, 63, 64 and 66C. Extractable protein, acid phosphatase and catalase activities decreased as internal cooking temperature increased, but lactate dehydrogenase activity remained unchanged. Samples cooked to 63C had extractable protein concentrations between 9.11 and 10.02 mg/g (95% confidence). Catalase was rapidly inactivated between 55 and 60C and may be suitable for identification of severely undercooked product. Acid phosphatase activity was influenced by method of storage (fresh versus frozen). A method based on total extractable protein appeared to be the most promising for determining the end point cooking temperature of catfish.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

The most precise and reliable method to verify maximum cooking temperature attained during heat treatment of catfish fillets was total extractable protein. This finding may be useful for critical control point verification and may be valuable where claims of foodborne illness associated with catfish consumption are being litigated or investigated. To confirm gross undercooking, an easier test would be to measure catalase activity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海峡鲶鱼鱼片终点蒸煮温度验证方法的比较
摘要:将鱼烹调至63摄氏度,烹调15秒是确保人类食用安全的重要步骤。对槽鱼(Ictalurus punctatus)的热过程验证方法尚未得到验证。本研究比较了可提取蛋白定量、乳酸脱氢酶、酸性磷酸酶和过氧化氢酶活性测定对通道鲶鱼鱼片蒸煮温度的验证。磨碎的生鲶鱼鱼片样本(新鲜的和冷冻的)被煮到55、60、62、63、64和66摄氏度。随着蒸煮温度的升高,可提取蛋白、酸性磷酸酶和过氧化氢酶活性降低,乳酸脱氢酶活性保持不变。样品煮至63℃时,可提取的蛋白质浓度在9.11至10.02 mg/g之间(95%置信度)。过氧化氢酶在55℃至60℃之间迅速失活,可能适用于鉴定严重未煮熟的产品。酸性磷酸酶活性受贮藏方法(新鲜与冷冻)的影响。基于总可提取蛋白的方法是确定鲶鱼最终烹饪温度最有希望的方法。在鲶鱼片热处理过程中,最精确、最可靠的蒸煮温度验证方法是总可提取蛋白。这一发现可能对关键控制点验证有用,并且在与食用鲶鱼有关的食源性疾病索赔被起诉或调查时可能有价值。要确认完全未煮熟,一个更简单的测试是测量过氧化氢酶的活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Muscle Foods
Journal of Muscle Foods 工程技术-食品科技
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Nurse-Led Cognitive Training Intervention for Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes. DETECTION OF THE INDIGENOUS SALMONELLA LEVEL IN A RADIATION-STERILIZED PURE CULTURE AND MEAT MODEL SYSTEM EFFECT OF LACTATE ENHANCEMENT ON MYOGLOBIN OXYGENATION OF BEEF LONGISSIMUS STEAKS OVERWRAPPED IN PVC AND STORED AT 4C EFFECTS OF ADDED CRUDE GREEN TEA POLYPHENOL ON THE LIPID OXIDATION OF COMMON CARP (CYPRINUS CARPIO L.) AND CATFISH (CLARIAS GARIEPINUS BURCHELL) DURING REFRIGERATED STORAGE EFFECT OF PROTEOLYTIC ENZYME TREATMENTS AND PRESSURE COOKING ON QUALITY OF SPENT SHEEP MEAT CURRY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1