COMPARISON OF PATHOGENIC MICROORGANISMS ON POULTRY CARCASSES IN ORGANIZED SLAUGHTERHOUSES AND RETAIL OUTLETS IN AND AROUND MUMBAI CITY

VILAS M. VAIDYA, ASHISH M. PATURKAR, VIKAS S. WASKAR, RAVINDRA J. ZENDE, ZUNJAR B. DUBAL
{"title":"COMPARISON OF PATHOGENIC MICROORGANISMS ON POULTRY CARCASSES IN ORGANIZED SLAUGHTERHOUSES AND RETAIL OUTLETS IN AND AROUND MUMBAI CITY","authors":"VILAS M. VAIDYA,&nbsp;ASHISH M. PATURKAR,&nbsp;VIKAS S. WASKAR,&nbsp;RAVINDRA J. ZENDE,&nbsp;ZUNJAR B. DUBAL","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00176.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> ABSTRACT</h3>\n \n <p> <i>A total of 324 swab samples were collected from organized slaughterhouses and retail outlets at various processing steps from poultry carcasses, and the samples were processed for total viable counts (TVCs) and differential counts. The TVCs (log<sub>10</sub> cfu/cm<sup>2</sup></i> ± <i>standard error) in organized slaughterhouses at different processing steps were found to be 5.18</i> ± <i>0.09 after shackling, 5.24</i> ± <i>0.15 after bleeding, 3.95</i> ± <i>0.14 after scalding and defeathering, 5.26</i> ± <i>0.15 after evisceration and 4.98</i> ± <i>0.17 after cutting, while the same in retail outlets were 6.63</i> ± <i>0.21 before slaughter, 7.29</i> ± <i>0.20 after bleeding, 6.53</i> ± <i>0.24 after removal of skin with feathers, 7.24</i> ± <i>0.26 after evisceration and 7.40</i> ± <i>0.22 after cutting, respectively. Analysis of variance for TVC during different steps in both revealed highly significant differences (P</i> &lt; <i>0.01). Also, the contamination during various steps varied significantly. The differential counts revealed that</i> Escherichia coli <i>was predominant in all processing steps in organized slaughterhouses, whereas</i> Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli <i>and</i> Clostridium <i>spp. were present in all steps in retail outlets. Twenty samples in retail outlets showed the presence of</i> Salmonella <i>spp. The average prevalence of all organisms isolated during various processing steps in organized slaughterhouses and retail outlets are 9.13 and 82.21%</i> S. aureus, <i>0 and 47.49%</i> Bacillus cereus, <i>14.99 and 39.23%</i> Clostridium <i>spp., 17.46 and 81.52%</i> E. coli, <i>and 0 and 10.55%</i> Salmonella <i>spp.</i></p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS</h3>\n \n <p>The study concluded that retail outlets showed highest bacterial counts as well as maximum number of isolates as compared with organized slaughterhouses. <i>Bacillus cereus</i> and <i>Salmonella</i> spp. were absent in hygienically processed carcasses. Evisceration, as well as scalding and defeathering, was found to be the critical operations in organized slaughterhouses, while cutting, bleeding, evisceration and removal of skin with feathers were noted as the critical operations in retail outlets. The presence of pathogenic microbes on poultry carcasses in organized slaughterhouses and retail outlets delineates the different hazards to the consumers from such pathogens and the need for a comprehensive quality assurance program especially in small poultry slaughtering and dressing units to ensure safe and wholesome meat to consumers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50122,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Muscle Foods","volume":"21 2","pages":"197-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00176.x","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Muscle Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00176.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A total of 324 swab samples were collected from organized slaughterhouses and retail outlets at various processing steps from poultry carcasses, and the samples were processed for total viable counts (TVCs) and differential counts. The TVCs (log10 cfu/cm2 ± standard error) in organized slaughterhouses at different processing steps were found to be 5.18 ± 0.09 after shackling, 5.24 ± 0.15 after bleeding, 3.95 ± 0.14 after scalding and defeathering, 5.26 ± 0.15 after evisceration and 4.98 ± 0.17 after cutting, while the same in retail outlets were 6.63 ± 0.21 before slaughter, 7.29 ± 0.20 after bleeding, 6.53 ± 0.24 after removal of skin with feathers, 7.24 ± 0.26 after evisceration and 7.40 ± 0.22 after cutting, respectively. Analysis of variance for TVC during different steps in both revealed highly significant differences (P < 0.01). Also, the contamination during various steps varied significantly. The differential counts revealed that Escherichia coli was predominant in all processing steps in organized slaughterhouses, whereas Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli and Clostridium spp. were present in all steps in retail outlets. Twenty samples in retail outlets showed the presence of Salmonella spp. The average prevalence of all organisms isolated during various processing steps in organized slaughterhouses and retail outlets are 9.13 and 82.21% S. aureus, 0 and 47.49% Bacillus cereus, 14.99 and 39.23% Clostridium spp., 17.46 and 81.52% E. coli, and 0 and 10.55% Salmonella spp.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

The study concluded that retail outlets showed highest bacterial counts as well as maximum number of isolates as compared with organized slaughterhouses. Bacillus cereus and Salmonella spp. were absent in hygienically processed carcasses. Evisceration, as well as scalding and defeathering, was found to be the critical operations in organized slaughterhouses, while cutting, bleeding, evisceration and removal of skin with feathers were noted as the critical operations in retail outlets. The presence of pathogenic microbes on poultry carcasses in organized slaughterhouses and retail outlets delineates the different hazards to the consumers from such pathogens and the need for a comprehensive quality assurance program especially in small poultry slaughtering and dressing units to ensure safe and wholesome meat to consumers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟买市及周边有组织屠宰场和零售店家禽尸体上病原微生物的比较
从有组织的屠宰场和零售网点收集家禽尸体的不同处理步骤的324个拭子样本,并对样本进行总活菌计数(tvc)和差异计数处理。tvc (log10 cfu / cm2±标准错误)在屠宰场组织在不同的处理步骤用镣铐锁住后被发现是5.18±0.09,5.24±0.15后出血,3.95±0.14烫伤和拔毛后,取出内脏后5.26±0.15,4.98±0.17切割后,在相同的零售网点屠宰前分别为6.63±0.21,7.29±0.20后出血,6.53±0.24与羽毛切除皮肤后,取出内脏后7.24±0.26,7.40±0.22切割后,分别。两组TVC在不同阶段的方差分析显示极显著差异(P < 0.01)。此外,不同步骤的污染程度差异也很大。差异计数显示,大肠杆菌在有组织的屠宰场的所有加工步骤中占主导地位,而金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和梭状芽孢杆菌在零售店的所有步骤中都存在。在有组织的屠宰场和零售店各加工步骤中分离出的所有生物的平均感染率分别为金黄色葡萄球菌9.13%和82.21%,蜡样芽孢杆菌0和47.49%,梭状芽孢杆菌14.99和39.23%,大肠杆菌17.46和81.52%;实际应用研究得出结论,与有组织的屠宰场相比,零售商店的细菌数量和分离菌数量最高。经卫生处理的胴体中未检出蜡样芽孢杆菌和沙门氏菌。在有组织的屠宰场中,剔骨、烫毛和拔毛是主要的操作,而在零售店中,切割、放血、剔骨和去除带羽毛的皮肤是主要的操作。在有组织的屠宰场和零售店中,家禽尸体上存在病原微生物,这说明了此类病原体对消费者的不同危害,以及需要制定全面的质量保证计划,特别是在小型家禽屠宰和屠宰单位,以确保向消费者提供安全和卫生的肉类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Muscle Foods
Journal of Muscle Foods 工程技术-食品科技
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Nurse-Led Cognitive Training Intervention for Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes. DETECTION OF THE INDIGENOUS SALMONELLA LEVEL IN A RADIATION-STERILIZED PURE CULTURE AND MEAT MODEL SYSTEM EFFECT OF LACTATE ENHANCEMENT ON MYOGLOBIN OXYGENATION OF BEEF LONGISSIMUS STEAKS OVERWRAPPED IN PVC AND STORED AT 4C EFFECTS OF ADDED CRUDE GREEN TEA POLYPHENOL ON THE LIPID OXIDATION OF COMMON CARP (CYPRINUS CARPIO L.) AND CATFISH (CLARIAS GARIEPINUS BURCHELL) DURING REFRIGERATED STORAGE EFFECT OF PROTEOLYTIC ENZYME TREATMENTS AND PRESSURE COOKING ON QUALITY OF SPENT SHEEP MEAT CURRY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1