Effectiveness of Tight Glycemic Control in the Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.

A. Merrill, Susie Jones
{"title":"Effectiveness of Tight Glycemic Control in the Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.","authors":"A. Merrill, Susie Jones","doi":"10.11124/01938924-201008341-00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Intensive Insulin Therapy (IIT) as a means to achieve tight glycemic control (TGC) has become controversial in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) or mixed medical-surgical ICU. The question still remains as to the benefit of tight glycemic control in all patient populations and the optimal target blood glucose range.\n\nREVIEW QUESTIONS/OBJECTIVES: INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review included studies with patients 18 years of age and older, females and males, all types of conditions or diseases, and all stages of severity admitted to a critical care or intensive care unit that required hyperglycemia management and had not had a surgical procedure. This review included studies that evaluated the effectiveness of tight glycemic control or intensive insulin therapy as compared to conventional, moderate or liberal insulin therapy. This review considered studies that included the following outcome measures: frequency and severity of hypoglycemia, and any type of reported mortality. This review included only randomized controlled trials which met all of the inclusion criteria.\n\nSEARCH STRATEGY: A three-step search strategy was utilized find both published and unpublished studies in English language only. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL was completed followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe the article. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms was then undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles was searched for additional studies.\n\nMETHODOLOGICAL QUALITY: The reviewers used the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomised Controlled Trials to assess methodological quality.\nDATA COLLECTION: Data was extracted using The JBI Data Extraction Form for Experimental/Observational studies.\n\nDATA SYNTHESIS: Due to the heterogeneous nature of the study methods, the findings of this systematic review are presented in a narrative summary. Meta-analysis was unable to be performed.\n\nRESULTS: The four studies in this systematic review include patients with a multitude of diagnoses and comorbidities which further complicates treatment and outcomes assessment. Until further studies prove otherwise, nonsurgical patients requiring glycemic management are best served with less intensive regimens than their surgical counterparts.\n\nCONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to establish clear, evidence-based guidelines for the management of hyperglycemia in all ICU patient populations.Based on the results of this review and data from the four included studies, glycemic management for medical patients in the intensive care unit should differ from that of surgical patients. Blood glucoses should be kept between 110-180mg/dL in order to prevent the unwarranted effects of hypoglycemic episodes. Published studies compare outcomes for patients with dissimilar medical conditions and current protocols for glycemic management are still based on the results of surgical patient trials. Measurements for interventions and outcomes need to be standardized in order to ensure proper comparison and application of results.","PeriodicalId":91723,"journal":{"name":"JBI library of systematic reviews","volume":"8 34 Suppl 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI library of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/01938924-201008341-00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intensive Insulin Therapy (IIT) as a means to achieve tight glycemic control (TGC) has become controversial in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) or mixed medical-surgical ICU. The question still remains as to the benefit of tight glycemic control in all patient populations and the optimal target blood glucose range. REVIEW QUESTIONS/OBJECTIVES: INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review included studies with patients 18 years of age and older, females and males, all types of conditions or diseases, and all stages of severity admitted to a critical care or intensive care unit that required hyperglycemia management and had not had a surgical procedure. This review included studies that evaluated the effectiveness of tight glycemic control or intensive insulin therapy as compared to conventional, moderate or liberal insulin therapy. This review considered studies that included the following outcome measures: frequency and severity of hypoglycemia, and any type of reported mortality. This review included only randomized controlled trials which met all of the inclusion criteria. SEARCH STRATEGY: A three-step search strategy was utilized find both published and unpublished studies in English language only. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL was completed followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe the article. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms was then undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles was searched for additional studies. METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY: The reviewers used the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomised Controlled Trials to assess methodological quality. DATA COLLECTION: Data was extracted using The JBI Data Extraction Form for Experimental/Observational studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Due to the heterogeneous nature of the study methods, the findings of this systematic review are presented in a narrative summary. Meta-analysis was unable to be performed. RESULTS: The four studies in this systematic review include patients with a multitude of diagnoses and comorbidities which further complicates treatment and outcomes assessment. Until further studies prove otherwise, nonsurgical patients requiring glycemic management are best served with less intensive regimens than their surgical counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to establish clear, evidence-based guidelines for the management of hyperglycemia in all ICU patient populations.Based on the results of this review and data from the four included studies, glycemic management for medical patients in the intensive care unit should differ from that of surgical patients. Blood glucoses should be kept between 110-180mg/dL in order to prevent the unwarranted effects of hypoglycemic episodes. Published studies compare outcomes for patients with dissimilar medical conditions and current protocols for glycemic management are still based on the results of surgical patient trials. Measurements for interventions and outcomes need to be standardized in order to ensure proper comparison and application of results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在重症监护病房严格控制血糖的有效性:系统评价。
背景:强化胰岛素治疗(Intensive Insulin Therapy, IIT)作为实现严格血糖控制(TGC)的一种手段,在内科重症监护病房(ICU)或内科-外科混合ICU中已成为有争议的问题。在所有患者群体中严格控制血糖的益处和最佳目标血糖范围仍然是一个问题。综述问题/目的:纳入标准:本综述纳入了18岁及以上、女性和男性、所有类型的病症或疾病、所有严重程度、入住重症监护或重症监护室、需要高血糖管理且未接受外科手术的患者。本综述包括评估严格血糖控制或强化胰岛素治疗与常规、中等或自由胰岛素治疗的有效性的研究。本综述考虑了包括以下结局指标的研究:低血糖的频率和严重程度,以及任何类型的报告死亡率。本综述仅纳入符合所有纳入标准的随机对照试验。检索策略:采用三步搜索策略,只查找已发表和未发表的英语研究。完成MEDLINE和CINAHL的初步有限搜索,然后分析标题和摘要中包含的文本词,以及用于描述文章的索引术语。然后在所有包含的数据库中使用所有确定的关键字和索引项进行第二次搜索。第三,检索所有确定的报告和文章的参考文献列表以查找其他研究。方法学质量:审稿人使用JBI随机对照试验关键评价清单来评估方法学质量。数据收集:使用JBI数据提取表提取实验/观察研究数据。数据综合:由于研究方法的异质性,本系统综述的结果以叙述性摘要的形式呈现。无法进行meta分析。结果:本系统综述中的四项研究包括了大量诊断和合并症的患者,这进一步使治疗和结果评估复杂化。在进一步的研究证明相反的观点之前,需要血糖控制的非手术患者最好采用较低强度的治疗方案。结论:需要进一步的研究来建立明确的、以证据为基础的针对所有ICU患者高血糖管理的指南。根据本综述的结果和四项纳入的研究的数据,重症监护病房内科患者的血糖管理应不同于外科患者。血糖应保持在110-180mg/dL之间,以防止低血糖发作的不必要影响。已发表的研究比较了不同医疗条件患者的结果,目前的血糖管理方案仍然基于手术患者试验的结果。干预措施和结果的测量需要标准化,以确保结果的适当比较和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A systematic review on the role of extremity skin temperature as a non-invasive marker for hypoperfusion in critically ill adults in the intensive care setting. Effectiveness of interventions for the assessment and prevention of falls in adult psychiatric patients: A systematic review. The impact of knowledge and beliefs on adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with heart failure: A systematic review. Effectiveness of surgical weight loss on the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. The effectiveness of physical restraints in reducing falls among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1