The impact of knowledge and beliefs on adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with heart failure: A systematic review.

T. Jasmine, Sally Chan Wai‐Chi, D. Hegney
{"title":"The impact of knowledge and beliefs on adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with heart failure: A systematic review.","authors":"T. Jasmine, Sally Chan Wai‐Chi, D. Hegney","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2012-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nHeart failure is a global health problem which affects a large percentage of the older population. Cardiac rehabilitation programs have been implemented to aid patients in successfully managing their heart condition. However, non-adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs is common in this group of patients. This results in higher morbidity and mortality rates, rehospitalisation and ultimately higher healthcare costs. There is a need to have a better understanding of the impact that knowledge and beliefs have on patients' adherence levels, so that healthcare providers can implement appropriate strategies to promote their adherence.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nThis review aimed to establish the best evidence regarding the impact of knowledge and beliefs on adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with heart failure; and to make recommendations for healthcare practice and future research.\n\n\nINCLUSION CRITERIA\nPatients above the age of 18, who had been diagnosed with heart failure and had been admitted to a cardiac rehabilitation program in inpatient or outpatient settings.This review considered studies that evaluated the impact of heart failure patients' knowledge and beliefs of their disease, medication, diet, exercise and other lifestyle change recommendations, on their adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs.Heart failure patients' knowledge, beliefs and adherence toward their medication regime, low-sodium diet, exercise, and other lifestyle change recommendations.Quantitative study designs published in the English language, up to December 2010 were considered for inclusion.\n\n\nSEARCH STRATEGY\nUsing a three-step search strategy, the following databases were assessed: CINAHL, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, OvidSP, MDConsult, ScienceDirect, Sociological Abstracts, Mosby's Nursing Consult, Mednar and TRIP.\n\n\nMETHODOLOGICAL QUALITY\nTwo independent reviewers assessed each paper for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute.\n\n\nDATA EXTRACTION\nInformation was extracted by two independent reviewers, from each paper using the standardised data extraction tool from the Joanna Briggs Institute.\n\n\nDATA SYNTHESIS\nThe findings are presented in narrative form, as statistical pooling was not possible, due to the different instruments used in measuring the outcomes.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTwelve quantitative studies were included in this review (one RCT, one pre-test/post-test single group study, and ten descriptive studies). The present findings suggest that the relationship between knowledge and adherence is unclear. However, patient beliefs on medication, symptom monitoring, illness and control were found to have stronger associations of adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs.Implications for practice Healthcare institutions need to provide adequate support for patients with heart failure; individualise adherence-enhancing interventions to cater for varying patient needs; and work on empowering patients.Implications for research Future quantitative research should be undertaken to investigate the relationship between knowledge and beliefs, determine their combined effect on adherence and examine the effectiveness of strategies used to improve patient knowledge and beliefs. Quantitative and qualitative studies could also be conducted to ascertain the factors correlated with patient knowledge, beliefs, and adherence.","PeriodicalId":91723,"journal":{"name":"JBI library of systematic reviews","volume":"10 7 1","pages":"399-470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-2012-53","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI library of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2012-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

BACKGROUND Heart failure is a global health problem which affects a large percentage of the older population. Cardiac rehabilitation programs have been implemented to aid patients in successfully managing their heart condition. However, non-adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs is common in this group of patients. This results in higher morbidity and mortality rates, rehospitalisation and ultimately higher healthcare costs. There is a need to have a better understanding of the impact that knowledge and beliefs have on patients' adherence levels, so that healthcare providers can implement appropriate strategies to promote their adherence. OBJECTIVES This review aimed to establish the best evidence regarding the impact of knowledge and beliefs on adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with heart failure; and to make recommendations for healthcare practice and future research. INCLUSION CRITERIA Patients above the age of 18, who had been diagnosed with heart failure and had been admitted to a cardiac rehabilitation program in inpatient or outpatient settings.This review considered studies that evaluated the impact of heart failure patients' knowledge and beliefs of their disease, medication, diet, exercise and other lifestyle change recommendations, on their adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs.Heart failure patients' knowledge, beliefs and adherence toward their medication regime, low-sodium diet, exercise, and other lifestyle change recommendations.Quantitative study designs published in the English language, up to December 2010 were considered for inclusion. SEARCH STRATEGY Using a three-step search strategy, the following databases were assessed: CINAHL, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, OvidSP, MDConsult, ScienceDirect, Sociological Abstracts, Mosby's Nursing Consult, Mednar and TRIP. METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY Two independent reviewers assessed each paper for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute. DATA EXTRACTION Information was extracted by two independent reviewers, from each paper using the standardised data extraction tool from the Joanna Briggs Institute. DATA SYNTHESIS The findings are presented in narrative form, as statistical pooling was not possible, due to the different instruments used in measuring the outcomes. RESULTS Twelve quantitative studies were included in this review (one RCT, one pre-test/post-test single group study, and ten descriptive studies). The present findings suggest that the relationship between knowledge and adherence is unclear. However, patient beliefs on medication, symptom monitoring, illness and control were found to have stronger associations of adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs.Implications for practice Healthcare institutions need to provide adequate support for patients with heart failure; individualise adherence-enhancing interventions to cater for varying patient needs; and work on empowering patients.Implications for research Future quantitative research should be undertaken to investigate the relationship between knowledge and beliefs, determine their combined effect on adherence and examine the effectiveness of strategies used to improve patient knowledge and beliefs. Quantitative and qualitative studies could also be conducted to ascertain the factors correlated with patient knowledge, beliefs, and adherence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识和信念对心力衰竭患者心脏康复计划依从性的影响:系统综述。
背景:心力衰竭是一个全球性的健康问题,影响了很大比例的老年人口。心脏康复计划已经实施,以帮助患者成功地控制他们的心脏状况。然而,不遵守心脏康复计划在这组患者中很常见。这导致更高的发病率和死亡率、再住院率和最终更高的医疗费用。有必要更好地了解知识和信念对患者依从性水平的影响,以便医疗保健提供者能够实施适当的策略来促进患者的依从性。目的:本综述旨在建立关于知识和信念对心力衰竭患者心脏康复计划依从性影响的最佳证据;并为医疗实践和未来的研究提出建议。纳入标准:年龄在18岁以上,被诊断为心力衰竭并在住院或门诊接受心脏康复计划的患者。本综述考虑了评估心力衰竭患者对其疾病的认识和信念、药物、饮食、运动和其他生活方式改变建议对他们坚持心脏康复计划的影响的研究。心力衰竭患者对药物治疗、低钠饮食、运动和其他生活方式改变建议的认识、信念和依从性。截至2010年12月,以英语发表的定量研究设计被纳入考虑范围。检索策略采用三步检索策略,对以下数据库进行评估:CINAHL、PubMed、SCOPUS、Web of Science、OvidSP、MDConsult、ScienceDirect、Sociological Abstracts、Mosby’s Nursing Consult、Mednar和TRIP。方法学质量在纳入研究之前,两名独立的审稿人使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的标准化关键评估工具评估了每篇论文的方法学有效性。数据提取信息由两名独立审稿人使用Joanna Briggs研究所的标准化数据提取工具从每篇论文中提取。数据综合由于在测量结果时使用了不同的工具,因此不可能进行统计汇总,因此研究结果以叙述形式呈现。结果本综述共纳入12项定量研究(1项随机对照试验、1项测试前/测试后单组研究和10项描述性研究)。目前的研究结果表明,知识与依从性之间的关系尚不清楚。然而,患者对药物、症状监测、疾病和控制的信念与心脏康复计划的依从性有更强的关联。对实践的启示医疗机构需要为心力衰竭患者提供足够的支持;个性化增强依从性的干预措施,以满足不同患者的需求;并致力于赋予病人权力。未来的定量研究应该进行,以调查知识和信念之间的关系,确定它们对依从性的综合影响,并检查用于提高患者知识和信念的策略的有效性。定量和定性研究也可用于确定与患者知识、信念和依从性相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A systematic review on the role of extremity skin temperature as a non-invasive marker for hypoperfusion in critically ill adults in the intensive care setting. Effectiveness of interventions for the assessment and prevention of falls in adult psychiatric patients: A systematic review. The impact of knowledge and beliefs on adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with heart failure: A systematic review. Effectiveness of surgical weight loss on the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. The effectiveness of physical restraints in reducing falls among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1