Identifying and reducing the incidence of post discharge Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in orthopaedic patients: a systematic review.

P. McLiesh, R. Wiechula
{"title":"Identifying and reducing the incidence of post discharge Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in orthopaedic patients: a systematic review.","authors":"P. McLiesh, R. Wiechula","doi":"10.11124/jbisrir-2012-315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND The risk of venous thromboembolism for orthopaedic patients is often high due to the length of surgery, damage from trauma to bone and soft tissues and lengthy periods of immobility or reduced mobility. Although venous thromboembolism occurs mainly in inpatients a significant number of patients develop venous thromboembolism post discharge OBJECTIVES: To synthesise the best available evidence on strategies that effectively reduce post discharge venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic patients. INCLUSION CRITERIA Patients regardless of age, gender or co-morbidities that have been admitted with an acute orthopaedic injury (unplanned) or a planned orthopaedic surgery/procedure and then followed up after discharge. Only papers describing the incidence and prophylaxis treatment used in non-Asian patients were considered for inclusion.Any interventions of combinations of chemoprophylaxis and/or mechanical prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism incidence extending beyond hospital admission.Outcomes included diagnosis of venous thromboembolism following an orthopaedic admission/surgery for up to 6 months post discharge and the incidence of any significant bleeding or death related to venous thromboembolism or haemorrhage.The review considered any randomised controlled trials; in the absence of RCTs other research designs, such as non-randomised controlled trials and before and after studies, were considered SEARCH STRATEGY: Search strategy considered only papers in English from 2000 to March 2012. METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY Papers selected for retrieval were assessed using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute. DATA COLLECTION Data was extracted from the studies using the standardised Johanna Briggs Institute data extraction form. DATA SYNTHESIS Of the included studies none matched methodology, treatment or comparator that allowed meta-analysis. The results were therefore presented in a narrative form and were structured using patient population, then intervention and then analysis of results. RESULTS 20 articles were included in the systematic review. The overall incidence of post discharge venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic patients is not possible to determine due to the variability in reporting criteria and poor follow-up. Use of Low Molecular Weight Heparins was generally shown to be effective in preventing venous thromboembolism. The new generation Factor Xa inhibitors were shown to improve venous thromboembolism prevention however had a slightly higher risk of bleeding. There was limited high level research presented to allow effective assessment of aspirin and/or mechanical compression devices. CONCLUSIONS Prevention of post discharge venous thromboembolism is complex due to the number of variables that can influence its occurrence. The risk of post discharge venous thromboembolism varies among different patient populations so consideration must be given to matching the risk for each of those groups with available interventions.For higher risk orthopaedic patient groups such as those with large joint replacements and femoral fractures low molecular weight heparins should be considered and continued where possible post discharge for thirty days however the risk profile for venous thromboembolism and bleeding must be considered for both populations and individuals.Consideration in future research design must be given to factors such as: adequate follow-up time, and standardised criteria to measure the incidence of post discharge venous thromboembolism.","PeriodicalId":91723,"journal":{"name":"JBI library of systematic reviews","volume":"10 41 1","pages":"2658-2710"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/jbisrir-2012-315","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI library of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2012-315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND The risk of venous thromboembolism for orthopaedic patients is often high due to the length of surgery, damage from trauma to bone and soft tissues and lengthy periods of immobility or reduced mobility. Although venous thromboembolism occurs mainly in inpatients a significant number of patients develop venous thromboembolism post discharge OBJECTIVES: To synthesise the best available evidence on strategies that effectively reduce post discharge venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic patients. INCLUSION CRITERIA Patients regardless of age, gender or co-morbidities that have been admitted with an acute orthopaedic injury (unplanned) or a planned orthopaedic surgery/procedure and then followed up after discharge. Only papers describing the incidence and prophylaxis treatment used in non-Asian patients were considered for inclusion.Any interventions of combinations of chemoprophylaxis and/or mechanical prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism incidence extending beyond hospital admission.Outcomes included diagnosis of venous thromboembolism following an orthopaedic admission/surgery for up to 6 months post discharge and the incidence of any significant bleeding or death related to venous thromboembolism or haemorrhage.The review considered any randomised controlled trials; in the absence of RCTs other research designs, such as non-randomised controlled trials and before and after studies, were considered SEARCH STRATEGY: Search strategy considered only papers in English from 2000 to March 2012. METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY Papers selected for retrieval were assessed using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute. DATA COLLECTION Data was extracted from the studies using the standardised Johanna Briggs Institute data extraction form. DATA SYNTHESIS Of the included studies none matched methodology, treatment or comparator that allowed meta-analysis. The results were therefore presented in a narrative form and were structured using patient population, then intervention and then analysis of results. RESULTS 20 articles were included in the systematic review. The overall incidence of post discharge venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic patients is not possible to determine due to the variability in reporting criteria and poor follow-up. Use of Low Molecular Weight Heparins was generally shown to be effective in preventing venous thromboembolism. The new generation Factor Xa inhibitors were shown to improve venous thromboembolism prevention however had a slightly higher risk of bleeding. There was limited high level research presented to allow effective assessment of aspirin and/or mechanical compression devices. CONCLUSIONS Prevention of post discharge venous thromboembolism is complex due to the number of variables that can influence its occurrence. The risk of post discharge venous thromboembolism varies among different patient populations so consideration must be given to matching the risk for each of those groups with available interventions.For higher risk orthopaedic patient groups such as those with large joint replacements and femoral fractures low molecular weight heparins should be considered and continued where possible post discharge for thirty days however the risk profile for venous thromboembolism and bleeding must be considered for both populations and individuals.Consideration in future research design must be given to factors such as: adequate follow-up time, and standardised criteria to measure the incidence of post discharge venous thromboembolism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别和减少骨科患者出院后静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的发生率:一项系统综述。
骨科患者发生静脉血栓栓塞的风险通常很高,这是由于手术时间长、骨骼和软组织损伤以及长时间的不活动或活动能力降低。尽管静脉血栓栓塞主要发生在住院患者中,但相当数量的患者在出院后发生静脉血栓栓塞目的:综合现有的最佳证据,有效减少骨科患者出院后静脉血栓栓塞的策略。纳入标准:因急性骨科损伤(计划外)或计划骨科手术/手术而入院并出院后随访的患者,不论年龄、性别或合并症。只有描述非亚洲患者发病率和预防性治疗的论文才被纳入考虑。任何化学预防和/或机械预防相结合的干预措施,以防止住院后静脉血栓栓塞的发生。结果包括出院后6个月骨科住院/手术后静脉血栓栓塞的诊断,以及与静脉血栓栓塞或出血相关的任何重大出血或死亡的发生率。该综述考虑了所有随机对照试验;在没有随机对照试验的情况下,考虑其他研究设计,如非随机对照试验和前后研究。检索策略:检索策略仅考虑2000年至2012年3月的英文论文。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的标准化关键评估工具对选择用于检索的方法学质量文件进行评估。数据收集使用标准化的约翰娜布里格斯研究所数据提取表从研究中提取数据。在纳入的研究中,没有匹配的方法学、治疗或比较物允许进行meta分析。因此,结果以叙述的形式呈现,并使用患者群体,然后干预,然后分析结果来构建。结果20篇文献被纳入系统评价。骨科患者出院后静脉血栓栓塞的总体发生率由于报告标准的差异和随访不良而无法确定。使用低分子肝素通常被证明是有效的预防静脉血栓栓塞。新一代Xa因子抑制剂被证明可以改善静脉血栓栓塞的预防,但出血的风险略高。有关阿司匹林和/或机械压迫装置的有效评估的高水平研究有限。结论静脉血栓栓塞的预防是复杂的,影响其发生的因素很多。出院后静脉血栓栓塞的风险在不同的患者群体中有所不同,因此必须考虑将这些群体的风险与可用的干预措施相匹配。对于高风险的骨科患者,如大关节置换术和股骨骨折患者,应考虑使用低分子肝素,并在出院后30天内继续使用,但必须考虑人群和个人发生静脉血栓栓塞和出血的风险。在未来的研究设计中,必须考虑以下因素:足够的随访时间,以及衡量出院后静脉血栓栓塞发生率的标准化标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A systematic review on the role of extremity skin temperature as a non-invasive marker for hypoperfusion in critically ill adults in the intensive care setting. Effectiveness of interventions for the assessment and prevention of falls in adult psychiatric patients: A systematic review. The impact of knowledge and beliefs on adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with heart failure: A systematic review. Effectiveness of surgical weight loss on the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. The effectiveness of physical restraints in reducing falls among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1