The psychometric properties, feasibility and utility of behavioural-observation methods in pain assessment of cognitively impaired elderly people in acute and long-term care: A systematic review.

Siok Qi, J. Diane, D. Kay
{"title":"The psychometric properties, feasibility and utility of behavioural-observation methods in pain assessment of cognitively impaired elderly people in acute and long-term care: A systematic review.","authors":"Siok Qi, J. Diane, D. Kay","doi":"10.11124/jbisrir-2012-62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND The key factor to improving pain management for cognitively impaired elderly patients is accurate pain assessment. Behavioural-observation methods are required for individuals who cannot communicate their pain verbally. A thorough understanding of the key components of behavioural pain assessment and the use of valid and reliable behavioural pain assessment tools would enhance the assessment of pain in this vulnerable population. OBJECTIVES To identify the key components involved in behavioural pain assessment in cognitively impaired elderly people and to analyse the reported psychometric properties, feasibility and utility of behavioural pain assessment tools. SELECTION CRITERIA Studies using descriptive, correlation and comparative designs were included.Cognitively impaired elderly people older than 65 years in aged care, acute care or nursing home settings were included.Components measured in behavioural pain assessment; psychometric properties, feasibility and utility of behavioural pain assessment tools used to assess pain in cognitively impaired elderly people in acute or long-term care settings.Identification of behavioural criteria for assessment of pain and investigation of any aspect of the psychometric properties of behavioural pain assessment tools. SEARCH STRATEGY An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL to find published studies between 1990 to 2010 in the English Language was undertaken, following an analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms was undertaken and extended to a further seven relevant databases. Thirdly, the reference lists of all identified reports and articles were searched for additional studies. METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY Studies selected for retrieval were assessed for inclusion by two independent reviewers for methodological validity using the Critical Appraisal Tool for Psychometric Studies adapted from Fallon, Westaway, and Moloney1. DATA EXTRACTION Quantitative data were extracted from included studies using the Data Extraction Tool for Psychometric Studies adapted from Fallon, Westaway, and Mahoney1. DATA SYNTHESIS As statistical pooling was not possible, evidence in relation to psychometric properties, was analysed and presented in narrative summary. RESULTS Twenty three studies were included in the review. No tool has been found suitable for use across both acute and long-term care settings. Nevertheless, three tools show the most promising outcomes and potential for use. CONCLUSIONS Although behavioural measures may inform healthcare providers on the presence of pain in an individual, they do not provide information about the aetiology of pain. Hence, pain assessment should not depend solely on behavioural observation conducted using standardised behavioural pain assessment tools, but regarded as an essential component of a multifaceted approach to pain assessment. Clinicians may select tools which show promising qualities and pilot them in their respective clinical settings and populations. In particular, the MPS, the PACSLAC and the PAINAD are recommended for potential use in the cognitively impaired elderly in acute and long-term care settings.Several tools show promise for use in acute or long-term care settings. These tools require tool revisions to strengthen their psychometric properties. Instead of developing new tools, modification of existing tools and conducting further psychometric evaluations on them can provide more evidence of their psychometric properties.","PeriodicalId":91723,"journal":{"name":"JBI library of systematic reviews","volume":"10 17 1","pages":"977-1085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/jbisrir-2012-62","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI library of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2012-62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

BACKGROUND The key factor to improving pain management for cognitively impaired elderly patients is accurate pain assessment. Behavioural-observation methods are required for individuals who cannot communicate their pain verbally. A thorough understanding of the key components of behavioural pain assessment and the use of valid and reliable behavioural pain assessment tools would enhance the assessment of pain in this vulnerable population. OBJECTIVES To identify the key components involved in behavioural pain assessment in cognitively impaired elderly people and to analyse the reported psychometric properties, feasibility and utility of behavioural pain assessment tools. SELECTION CRITERIA Studies using descriptive, correlation and comparative designs were included.Cognitively impaired elderly people older than 65 years in aged care, acute care or nursing home settings were included.Components measured in behavioural pain assessment; psychometric properties, feasibility and utility of behavioural pain assessment tools used to assess pain in cognitively impaired elderly people in acute or long-term care settings.Identification of behavioural criteria for assessment of pain and investigation of any aspect of the psychometric properties of behavioural pain assessment tools. SEARCH STRATEGY An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL to find published studies between 1990 to 2010 in the English Language was undertaken, following an analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms was undertaken and extended to a further seven relevant databases. Thirdly, the reference lists of all identified reports and articles were searched for additional studies. METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY Studies selected for retrieval were assessed for inclusion by two independent reviewers for methodological validity using the Critical Appraisal Tool for Psychometric Studies adapted from Fallon, Westaway, and Moloney1. DATA EXTRACTION Quantitative data were extracted from included studies using the Data Extraction Tool for Psychometric Studies adapted from Fallon, Westaway, and Mahoney1. DATA SYNTHESIS As statistical pooling was not possible, evidence in relation to psychometric properties, was analysed and presented in narrative summary. RESULTS Twenty three studies were included in the review. No tool has been found suitable for use across both acute and long-term care settings. Nevertheless, three tools show the most promising outcomes and potential for use. CONCLUSIONS Although behavioural measures may inform healthcare providers on the presence of pain in an individual, they do not provide information about the aetiology of pain. Hence, pain assessment should not depend solely on behavioural observation conducted using standardised behavioural pain assessment tools, but regarded as an essential component of a multifaceted approach to pain assessment. Clinicians may select tools which show promising qualities and pilot them in their respective clinical settings and populations. In particular, the MPS, the PACSLAC and the PAINAD are recommended for potential use in the cognitively impaired elderly in acute and long-term care settings.Several tools show promise for use in acute or long-term care settings. These tools require tool revisions to strengthen their psychometric properties. Instead of developing new tools, modification of existing tools and conducting further psychometric evaluations on them can provide more evidence of their psychometric properties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为观察方法在急性和长期护理中评估认知障碍老年人疼痛的心理测量特性、可行性和实用性:系统综述。
背景:准确的疼痛评估是改善老年认知障碍患者疼痛管理的关键因素。对于不能用语言表达痛苦的人,需要行为观察方法。彻底了解行为疼痛评估的关键组成部分,并使用有效可靠的行为疼痛评估工具,将加强对这一弱势群体疼痛的评估。目的识别认知障碍老年人行为疼痛评估的关键成分,分析已有的行为疼痛评估工具的心理测量特性、可行性和实用性。选择标准采用描述性、相关性和比较性设计的研究纳入。老年人护理、急症护理或养老院环境中65岁以上的认知障碍老年人也包括在内。行为疼痛评估中测量的成分;用于评估急性或长期护理环境中认知受损老年人疼痛的行为疼痛评估工具的心理测量学特性、可行性和实用性。确定疼痛评估的行为标准,并调查行为疼痛评估工具的心理测量特性的任何方面。在对标题和摘要中包含的文本词进行分析之后,对MEDLINE和CINAHL进行了初步的有限搜索,以查找1990年至2010年间发表的英语研究。使用所有确定的关键字和索引词进行了第二次搜索,并扩展到另外七个相关数据库。第三,在所有确定的报告和文章的参考文献列表中搜索其他研究。入选研究的方法学质量由两名独立评审员评估纳入研究的方法学有效性,使用心理测量学关键评估工具(改编自Fallon、Westaway和moloney) 1。数据提取使用心理测量学数据提取工具(改编自Fallon、Westaway和mahoney)从纳入的研究中提取定量数据。数据综合由于统计汇集是不可能的,与心理测量特性有关的证据被分析并在叙述摘要中提出。结果共纳入23项研究。没有发现适合在急性和长期护理环境中使用的工具。然而,有三种工具显示出最有希望的结果和使用潜力。结论:尽管行为测量可以告知医疗保健提供者个体疼痛的存在,但它们不能提供有关疼痛病因的信息。因此,疼痛评估不应仅仅依赖于使用标准化行为疼痛评估工具进行的行为观察,而应被视为疼痛评估多方面方法的重要组成部分。临床医生可以选择显示有希望的质量的工具,并在各自的临床环境和人群中进行试点。特别是,MPS、PACSLAC和PAINAD被推荐用于急性和长期护理环境中有认知障碍的老年人。有几种工具有望用于急性或长期护理环境。这些工具需要修改工具以加强其心理测量特性。而不是开发新的工具,修改现有的工具,并对其进行进一步的心理测量评估,可以提供更多的证据,以证明其心理测量的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A systematic review on the role of extremity skin temperature as a non-invasive marker for hypoperfusion in critically ill adults in the intensive care setting. Effectiveness of interventions for the assessment and prevention of falls in adult psychiatric patients: A systematic review. The impact of knowledge and beliefs on adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with heart failure: A systematic review. Effectiveness of surgical weight loss on the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. The effectiveness of physical restraints in reducing falls among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1