{"title":"The Demon in Potentiality and the Devil in Actuality: Two Principles of Evil according to 4th/10th Century Ismailism","authors":"D. De Smet","doi":"10.1163/15700585-12341629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe Kitāb al-Kašf and the Kitāb al-Šaǧara, two 4th/10th century Ismaili works, share a dualistic vision of the world, marked by a continuous struggle between good and evil, light and darkness. Evil is identified with the exoteric religion deprived of its esoteric dimension. It is caused by a satanic pair, typified by Abū Bakr and ʿUmar b. al-Ḫaṭṭāb, the archetypes of the antagonists (aḍdād) opposing the Prophets and their Imams, from Adam to the advent of the Resurrector (al-Qāʾim). Through a personalized reading of selected verses from the Qurʾān, the authors of both works interpret the rejection of ʿAlī’s legacy by the first two caliphs as the paradigm of all opposition against the Imām’s esoteric knowledge leading to salvation. When ʿUmar represents the principle of evil in se, Abū Bakr stands for the weakness of the largest part of mankind, eager to be induced into error. By introducing into this doctrine the Aristotelian distinction between potentiality and actuality, the Kitāb al-Šaǧara develops an encompassing theory about the dynamics of evil.","PeriodicalId":8163,"journal":{"name":"Arabica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700585-12341629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Kitāb al-Kašf and the Kitāb al-Šaǧara, two 4th/10th century Ismaili works, share a dualistic vision of the world, marked by a continuous struggle between good and evil, light and darkness. Evil is identified with the exoteric religion deprived of its esoteric dimension. It is caused by a satanic pair, typified by Abū Bakr and ʿUmar b. al-Ḫaṭṭāb, the archetypes of the antagonists (aḍdād) opposing the Prophets and their Imams, from Adam to the advent of the Resurrector (al-Qāʾim). Through a personalized reading of selected verses from the Qurʾān, the authors of both works interpret the rejection of ʿAlī’s legacy by the first two caliphs as the paradigm of all opposition against the Imām’s esoteric knowledge leading to salvation. When ʿUmar represents the principle of evil in se, Abū Bakr stands for the weakness of the largest part of mankind, eager to be induced into error. By introducing into this doctrine the Aristotelian distinction between potentiality and actuality, the Kitāb al-Šaǧara develops an encompassing theory about the dynamics of evil.
《Kitāb al-Kašf》和《Kitāb al-Šaǧara》,这两本4 /10世纪的伊斯玛仪作品,分享了对世界的二元论观点,以善与恶、光明与黑暗之间的持续斗争为标志。邪恶被认为是被剥夺了深奥维度的开放宗教。它是由一对撒旦引起的,以阿布·贝克尔和乌玛尔·b·al-Ḫaṭṭāb为代表,他们是反对先知和他们的伊玛目的对手(aḍdād)的原型,从亚当到复活者(al- qal - qal - nim)的到来。通过对《古兰经ān》中精选经文的个性化阅读,这两部作品的作者将前两位哈里发对《古兰经》遗产的拒绝解释为所有反对《古兰经Imām》中通向救赎的深奥知识的范例。当欧麦尔代表邪恶的原则时,阿布巴克尔代表了人类最大部分的弱点,渴望被诱导进入错误。通过将亚里士多德对潜能和现实性的区分引入这一学说,Kitāb al-Šaǧara发展了一个关于恶的动力的包涵性理论。