Architectural acoustic design: Observation of use cases including audio-only and multimodal auralizations

IF 1.4 Q3 ACOUSTICS BUILDING ACOUSTICS Pub Date : 2021-09-15 DOI:10.1177/1351010X211045518
David Thery, David Poirier-Quinot, S. Jouan, B. Katz, V. Boccara
{"title":"Architectural acoustic design: Observation of use cases including audio-only and multimodal auralizations","authors":"David Thery, David Poirier-Quinot, S. Jouan, B. Katz, V. Boccara","doi":"10.1177/1351010X211045518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Auralization technology has reached a satisfactory level of ecological validity, enabling its use in architectural acoustic design. Only recently have the actual uses of auralization in the consulting community been explored, resulting in the identification of a variety of uses, including (1) to present to clients, (2) to test design ideas, (3) as a verification tool, (4) as a verification tool, (5) as a marketing tool, and (6) to improve internal company discussions. Taking advantage of methodologies from ergonomics research, the present study investigates effective uses through the observation of a collaboration project between an acoustic research team and an acoustic consultant, as a case study. Two spaces have been auralized in the context of the conception of a new skyscraper during the design phase of the project. The two spaces faced different problematics: an Atrium for which three different acoustic treatment options were suggested and experienced through multi-modal auralizations and audio-only auralizations of an Auditorium where an intrusive noise was to be acoustically treated. The ergonomic observation and analysis of this project revealed key impediments to the integration of auralization in common acoustic design practices.","PeriodicalId":51841,"journal":{"name":"BUILDING ACOUSTICS","volume":"29 1","pages":"179 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BUILDING ACOUSTICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X211045518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Auralization technology has reached a satisfactory level of ecological validity, enabling its use in architectural acoustic design. Only recently have the actual uses of auralization in the consulting community been explored, resulting in the identification of a variety of uses, including (1) to present to clients, (2) to test design ideas, (3) as a verification tool, (4) as a verification tool, (5) as a marketing tool, and (6) to improve internal company discussions. Taking advantage of methodologies from ergonomics research, the present study investigates effective uses through the observation of a collaboration project between an acoustic research team and an acoustic consultant, as a case study. Two spaces have been auralized in the context of the conception of a new skyscraper during the design phase of the project. The two spaces faced different problematics: an Atrium for which three different acoustic treatment options were suggested and experienced through multi-modal auralizations and audio-only auralizations of an Auditorium where an intrusive noise was to be acoustically treated. The ergonomic observation and analysis of this project revealed key impediments to the integration of auralization in common acoustic design practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑声学设计:观察用例,包括纯音频和多模态听觉化
听觉化技术已经达到了令人满意的生态有效性水平,使其能够在建筑声学设计中使用。直到最近,人们才对咨询社区中听觉化的实际用途进行了探索,从而确定了各种用途,包括(1)向客户展示,(2)测试设计想法,(3)作为验证工具,(4)作为验证工具,(5)作为营销工具,以及(6)改善公司内部讨论。利用人体工程学研究的方法,本研究通过观察声学研究团队和声学顾问之间的合作项目来调查有效的使用,作为案例研究。在项目的设计阶段,两个空间在新摩天大楼的概念背景下被具体化。这两个空间面临着不同的问题:中庭提出了三种不同的声学处理方案,并通过礼堂的多模态听觉化和纯音频听觉化来体验,礼堂的侵入性噪音将被声学处理。这个项目的人体工程学观察和分析揭示了在普通声学设计实践中整合听觉化的主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BUILDING ACOUSTICS
BUILDING ACOUSTICS ACOUSTICS-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Enhancing response estimation and system identification in structural health monitoring through data-driven approaches Effect of loudspeaker position and model on cognitive load, quality, clarity, and sentence recognition performance Determination of the sound absorption coefficient of ETFE cushions in-situ using the genetic material optimizer in Odeon® Methodological approaches and main factors considered in school soundscape studies: A scoping review The relationship between the in situ flanking sound reduction index and the laboratory measured flanking normalized level difference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1