Education and Advance Care Planning in Nursing Homes: The Impact of Ownership Type

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly Pub Date : 1998-09-01 DOI:10.1177/0899764098273005
E. Bradley, Leslie C. Walker
{"title":"Education and Advance Care Planning in Nursing Homes: The Impact of Ownership Type","authors":"E. Bradley, Leslie C. Walker","doi":"10.1177/0899764098273005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examined the association between ownership type and community benefit as measured by organizational approaches to patient, family, and community education. As a case study of the broader class of educational efforts, the inquiry focused on educational efforts regarding a central patient care issue for nursing homes: the use of life-sustaining medical treatment. Results indicated that nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes were equally likely to conduct educational efforts concerning advance care planning. However, nonprofit nursing homes were more likely than for-profit nursing homes to have ongoing, rather than sporadic, discussions about advance care planning; to broaden such discussions beyond life-support wishes; and to have ethics committees to support advance care planning. Other empirical research has demonstrated ownership differences in both cost and quality of care. This study offers new evidence regarding additional ways in which nonprofit long-term care facilities may be distinguished from their for-profit counterparts.","PeriodicalId":48235,"journal":{"name":"Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly","volume":"25 1","pages":"339 - 357"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0899764098273005","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764098273005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The study examined the association between ownership type and community benefit as measured by organizational approaches to patient, family, and community education. As a case study of the broader class of educational efforts, the inquiry focused on educational efforts regarding a central patient care issue for nursing homes: the use of life-sustaining medical treatment. Results indicated that nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes were equally likely to conduct educational efforts concerning advance care planning. However, nonprofit nursing homes were more likely than for-profit nursing homes to have ongoing, rather than sporadic, discussions about advance care planning; to broaden such discussions beyond life-support wishes; and to have ethics committees to support advance care planning. Other empirical research has demonstrated ownership differences in both cost and quality of care. This study offers new evidence regarding additional ways in which nonprofit long-term care facilities may be distinguished from their for-profit counterparts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育与养老院的预先护理计划:所有权类型的影响
该研究通过对患者、家庭和社区教育的组织方法来衡量所有权类型和社区利益之间的关系。作为对更广泛的教育工作类别的一个案例研究,调查的重点是关于疗养院的一个中心病人护理问题的教育工作:使用维持生命的医疗。结果表明,非营利性和营利性养老院同样有可能开展有关提前护理计划的教育工作。然而,非营利性养老院比营利性养老院更有可能对预先护理计划进行持续而不是零星的讨论;将这类讨论扩大到生命维持愿望之外;还要有伦理委员会来支持预先的护理计划。其他实证研究表明,在成本和护理质量方面,所有权存在差异。这项研究提供了新的证据,关于额外的方式,非营利性长期护理机构可能区别于他们的营利性同行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, the journal of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, is an international, interdisciplinary journal that seeks to enhance the quality of life and general welfare of humanity through effective and appropriate voluntary action by reporting on research and programs related to voluntarism, citizen participation, philanthropy, and nonprofit organizations in societies around the world.
期刊最新文献
Many Things to Many People: The Diversity of Motivations for Joining Diasporic Organizations in the Global South. Talking the Talk, or Walking the Walk? How Managerial Practices Relate to Nonprofit Organizations' Role as Schools of Democracy. Microfoundations of Dynamic Capabilities for Social Innovations in Small Non-Profit Organizations When a Crisis Has a Silver Lining: Social Media P2p Fundraising at the Start of COVID-19 Behind the Crowdsourcing Platform: Assessing Volunteer Recruitment and Engagement Instruments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1