The preference of onboard activities in a new age of automated driving.

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 European Transport Research Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-18 DOI:10.1186/s12544-022-00540-7
Jamil Hamadneh, Domokos Esztergár-Kiss
{"title":"The preference of onboard activities in a new age of automated driving.","authors":"Jamil Hamadneh, Domokos Esztergár-Kiss","doi":"10.1186/s12544-022-00540-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to the economic theory assumption, travelers tend to monetize travel time based on factors related to their individual and trip characteristics. In the literature, a limited number of studies evaluating onboard activities on traveler's utility in the presence of the autonomous vehicle (AV) are found. In the current research, traveler preferences on board of three transport modes: individual-ride autonomous vehicle (IR-AV), shared-ride autonomous vehicle (SAV), and public transport (PT) are studied. The focus of this paper is the examination of travelers in urban areas, where traveling is relatively short, and the study of the travelers' main trip purposes. The impact of travel time, travel cost, and main onboard activity is estimated based on a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The in-vehicle onboard activities are divided into six onboard activities, where active and passive activities are considered. An experimental design and a stated preference (SP) survey are carried out. The result of the SP survey is analyzed, where a Mixed Logit (ML) model, which includes various explanatory variables, is applied. The developed model contains such variables as trip time, trip cost, main onboard activity, frequent transport mode, job, age, and car ownership. These variables show various effects on the probability of choosing a transport mode. The impact of change in travel time, travel cost, and each of the six onboard activities on traveler preferences is highlighted. As a result, variations on the impact of time, cost, and onboard activities are demonstrated. Furthermore, it is presented that people prefer using IR-AV over SAV and PT, while the probability of choosing SAV is the lowest. Besides, reading and using social media affect the utility of travelers positively (i.e., higher probability) to a greater extent than other activities, while writing alone demonstrates negative utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":48671,"journal":{"name":"European Transport Research Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Transport Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-022-00540-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the economic theory assumption, travelers tend to monetize travel time based on factors related to their individual and trip characteristics. In the literature, a limited number of studies evaluating onboard activities on traveler's utility in the presence of the autonomous vehicle (AV) are found. In the current research, traveler preferences on board of three transport modes: individual-ride autonomous vehicle (IR-AV), shared-ride autonomous vehicle (SAV), and public transport (PT) are studied. The focus of this paper is the examination of travelers in urban areas, where traveling is relatively short, and the study of the travelers' main trip purposes. The impact of travel time, travel cost, and main onboard activity is estimated based on a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The in-vehicle onboard activities are divided into six onboard activities, where active and passive activities are considered. An experimental design and a stated preference (SP) survey are carried out. The result of the SP survey is analyzed, where a Mixed Logit (ML) model, which includes various explanatory variables, is applied. The developed model contains such variables as trip time, trip cost, main onboard activity, frequent transport mode, job, age, and car ownership. These variables show various effects on the probability of choosing a transport mode. The impact of change in travel time, travel cost, and each of the six onboard activities on traveler preferences is highlighted. As a result, variations on the impact of time, cost, and onboard activities are demonstrated. Furthermore, it is presented that people prefer using IR-AV over SAV and PT, while the probability of choosing SAV is the lowest. Besides, reading and using social media affect the utility of travelers positively (i.e., higher probability) to a greater extent than other activities, while writing alone demonstrates negative utility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动驾驶新时代的车载活动偏好。
根据经济理论假设,旅行者倾向于根据与个人和旅行特点相关的因素将旅行时间货币化。在文献中,对自动驾驶汽车(AV)情况下旅客在车上活动的效用进行评估的研究数量有限。在当前的研究中,研究了旅客在三种交通模式(个人乘坐自动驾驶汽车(IR-AV)、共享乘坐自动驾驶汽车(SAV)和公共交通(PT))上的偏好。本文的重点是考察旅行时间相对较短的城市地区的旅行者,并研究旅行者的主要旅行目的。基于离散选择实验(DCE)对旅行时间、旅行成本和主要车载活动的影响进行了估计。车内乘车活动分为六种乘车活动,其中考虑了主动和被动活动。进行了实验设计和陈述偏好(SP)调查。对 SP 调查的结果进行了分析,并应用了包含各种解释变量的混合 Logit(ML)模型。所建立的模型包含出行时间、出行成本、主要乘车活动、常用交通方式、工作、年龄和汽车拥有量等变量。这些变量对选择交通方式的概率有不同的影响。旅行时间、旅行成本和六种车上活动中每一种的变化对旅客偏好的影响都很突出。结果表明,时间、成本和车上活动的影响各不相同。此外,研究还表明,与 SAV 和 PT 相比,人们更喜欢使用 IR-AV,而选择 SAV 的概率最低。此外,与其他活动相比,阅读和使用社交媒体对旅行者效用的正面影响(即更高的概率)更大,而单独写作则表现出负面效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Transport Research Review
European Transport Research Review Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: European Transport Research Review (ETRR) is a peer-reviewed open access journal publishing original high-quality scholarly research and developments in areas related to transportation science, technologies, policy and practice. Established in 2008 by the European Conference of Transport Research Institutes (ECTRI), the Journal provides researchers and practitioners around the world with an authoritative forum for the dissemination and critical discussion of new ideas and methodologies that originate in, or are of special interest to, the European transport research community. The journal is unique in its field, as it covers all modes of transport and addresses both the engineering and the social science perspective, offering a truly multidisciplinary platform for researchers, practitioners, engineers and policymakers. ETRR is aimed at a readership including researchers, practitioners in the design and operation of transportation systems, and policymakers at the international, national, regional and local levels.
期刊最新文献
Exploring hybrid models for identifying locations for active mobility pathways using real-time spatial Delphi and GANs. How accessibility to schools is not (just) a transport problem: the case of public school choice in the city of Malmö, Sweden Mobility-as-a-Service users: insights from a trial in Sydney Evaluating the impacts of the demerit points system on traffic law violations and driver involvement in road accidents in Israel Modelling public attitude towards drone delivery in Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1