Hierarchies of bias in artificial intelligence architecture: Collective, computational, and cognitive

Andrew Kudless
{"title":"Hierarchies of bias in artificial intelligence architecture: Collective, computational, and cognitive","authors":"Andrew Kudless","doi":"10.1177/14780771231170272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the prevalence of bias in artificial intelligence text-to-image models utilized in the architecture and design disciplines. The rapid pace of advancements in machine learning technologies, particularly in text-to-image generators, has significantly increased over the past year, making these tools more accessible to the design community. Accordingly, this paper aims to critically document and analyze the collective, computational, and cognitive biases that designers may encounter when working with these tools at this time. The paper delves into three hierarchical levels of operation and investigates the possible biases present at each level. Starting with the training data for large language models (LLM), the paper explores how these models may create biases privileging English-language users and perspectives. The paper subsequently investigates the digital materiality of models and how their weights generate specific aesthetic results. Finally, the report concludes by examining user biases through their prompt and image selections and the potential for platforms to perpetuate these biases through the application of user data during training. Graphical Abstract","PeriodicalId":45139,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Architectural Computing","volume":"21 1","pages":"256 - 279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Architectural Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771231170272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the prevalence of bias in artificial intelligence text-to-image models utilized in the architecture and design disciplines. The rapid pace of advancements in machine learning technologies, particularly in text-to-image generators, has significantly increased over the past year, making these tools more accessible to the design community. Accordingly, this paper aims to critically document and analyze the collective, computational, and cognitive biases that designers may encounter when working with these tools at this time. The paper delves into three hierarchical levels of operation and investigates the possible biases present at each level. Starting with the training data for large language models (LLM), the paper explores how these models may create biases privileging English-language users and perspectives. The paper subsequently investigates the digital materiality of models and how their weights generate specific aesthetic results. Finally, the report concludes by examining user biases through their prompt and image selections and the potential for platforms to perpetuate these biases through the application of user data during training. Graphical Abstract
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能架构中的偏见层次:集体、计算和认知
本文研究了建筑和设计学科中使用的人工智能文本到图像模型中普遍存在的偏见。机器学习技术的快速发展,特别是在文本到图像生成器方面,在过去的一年中有了显着的增长,使这些工具更容易被设计界使用。因此,本文旨在批判性地记录和分析设计师在使用这些工具时可能遇到的集体、计算和认知偏差。本文深入研究了三个层次的操作,并调查了每个层次上可能存在的偏差。从大型语言模型(LLM)的训练数据开始,本文探讨了这些模型如何产生偏向于英语用户和观点的偏见。论文随后研究了模型的数字物质性以及它们的权重如何产生特定的美学结果。最后,该报告通过用户的提示和图像选择来检查用户的偏见,以及平台通过在培训期间应用用户数据来延续这些偏见的可能性。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Encapsulating creative collaborations: A case study in the design of cement tiles RO-BIK—A robotic approach to developing dynamic architecture A convolutional neural network approach to classifying urban spaces using generative tools for data augmentation Reclaiming site analysis from co-sensing to co-ideation: A collective cartography strategy and tactical trajectories Interpreting a virtual reconstruction from different levels of detail: 3D modeling approaches combined with a phenomenological exploratory study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1