{"title":"Nationalistic German Gymnastic Movements and Modern Sports: Culture Between Identity and Habitus","authors":"D. Reicher","doi":"10.12759/HSR.45.2020.1.207-225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"»Die nationalistische deutsche Turnerbewegung und ihr Verhältnis zum modernen Sport. Kultur als Idee und Praxis zwischen Identität und Habitus«. The idea of habitus refers to modes of thinking and feeling that are more unaware and spontaneous. This includes unacknowledged and unreflected wefeelings towards political entities like nations. In contrast, national identity politics differs from habitus-types of we-feelings. Identity politics stresses reflection and deliberate boundary-drawing. In this sense, the article suggests to distinguish habitus from “identity.” Thus, there will be the suggestion to differ modes of nationalism, too: culturally “filled” nationalism and culturally “empty” nationalism. According to the first mode, “culture” is regarded a central issue of identity politics. According to “empty” nationalism, the ideal of being “better” or more “successful” than others gains importance. These theoretical considerations will be discussed against the background of the empirical case study focusing on nationalistic gymnastic movements in Germany and in Austria. This paper stresses the questions of how these nationalistic movements had coped with the growing popularity of modern sports in the end of the 19th and the first half of the 20th century and how their nationalism is related to the process of state-formation in Germany and Austria. This paper also tries to develop a clear understanding of the differences between the kind of nationalism represented by these gymnastic associations and the type of nationalism that can be observed in the context of modern sport-events.","PeriodicalId":47073,"journal":{"name":"Historical Social Research-Historische Sozialforschung","volume":"45 1","pages":"207-225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Social Research-Historische Sozialforschung","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12759/HSR.45.2020.1.207-225","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
»Die nationalistische deutsche Turnerbewegung und ihr Verhältnis zum modernen Sport. Kultur als Idee und Praxis zwischen Identität und Habitus«. The idea of habitus refers to modes of thinking and feeling that are more unaware and spontaneous. This includes unacknowledged and unreflected wefeelings towards political entities like nations. In contrast, national identity politics differs from habitus-types of we-feelings. Identity politics stresses reflection and deliberate boundary-drawing. In this sense, the article suggests to distinguish habitus from “identity.” Thus, there will be the suggestion to differ modes of nationalism, too: culturally “filled” nationalism and culturally “empty” nationalism. According to the first mode, “culture” is regarded a central issue of identity politics. According to “empty” nationalism, the ideal of being “better” or more “successful” than others gains importance. These theoretical considerations will be discussed against the background of the empirical case study focusing on nationalistic gymnastic movements in Germany and in Austria. This paper stresses the questions of how these nationalistic movements had coped with the growing popularity of modern sports in the end of the 19th and the first half of the 20th century and how their nationalism is related to the process of state-formation in Germany and Austria. This paper also tries to develop a clear understanding of the differences between the kind of nationalism represented by these gymnastic associations and the type of nationalism that can be observed in the context of modern sport-events.
»Die nationalistische deutsche Turnerbewegung and ihr Verhältnis zum modern Sport。文化、思想与实践:Identität与习惯”。习惯的概念是指更多的无意识和自发的思维和感觉模式。这包括未被承认和未被反映的我们对国家等政治实体的感情。相比之下,国家身份政治不同于我们的习惯类型。身份政治强调反思和刻意划定边界。在这个意义上,本文建议将习惯与“身份”区分开来。因此,也会有人提出不同的民族主义模式:文化上“充满”的民族主义和文化上“空虚”的民族主义。根据第一种模式,“文化”被视为身份政治的中心问题。根据“空洞的”民族主义,比别人“更好”或更“成功”的理想变得重要起来。这些理论考虑将在实证案例研究的背景下进行讨论,重点是德国和奥地利的民族主义体操运动。本文强调了这些民族主义运动是如何应对19世纪末和20世纪上半叶现代体育日益流行的问题,以及他们的民族主义与德国和奥地利国家形成过程的关系。本文还试图对这些体操协会所代表的民族主义类型与现代体育赛事背景下可以观察到的民族主义类型之间的差异有一个清晰的认识。