{"title":"Perspectives on the economics and sociology of health. Contributions from the institutionalist approach of economics of convention – an introduction","authors":"P. Batifoulier, Rainer Diaz-Bone","doi":"10.12759/hsr.46.2021.1.7-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perspektiven auf die Okonomie und Soziologie der Gesundheit. Beitrage des institutionalistischen Ansatzes der Okonomie der Konventionen – eine Einfuhrung«. This article introduces the approach of economics and sociology of conventions (in short EC) as a neopragmatist institutionalism in the field of economics and sociology of health. For EC, conventions are regarded as institutional logics of valuation, valorization, and coordination, and EC emphasizes the empirical plurality of orders of worth and values actors rely on and institutions are built on. In particular, health, health care, and its institutions are closely linked to value issues and norms. Because of the pluralism of possible value systems and orders of worth, tensions and critiques are an important empirical phenomenon to be addressed in the health care system. The contribution sketches main positions and perspectives of EC in the analysis of values, medical professions, and ethics of datafication, quantification, classification (related to health and health care in-stitutions), and of social inequalities as well as in the analysis of health policies and health capitalism. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences are discussed from the standpoint of EC and, finally, social trends and perspectives in times of the pandemic are outlined.1 © 2021, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":47073,"journal":{"name":"Historical Social Research-Historische Sozialforschung","volume":"46 1","pages":"7-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Social Research-Historische Sozialforschung","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.46.2021.1.7-34","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
健康的经济学和社会学观点。惯例经济学制度主义方法的贡献——导论
展望经济学与社会科学与社会科学。传统经济的制度分析与经济发展[j]。本文介绍了作为新实用主义制度主义的惯例经济学和惯例社会学在健康经济学和社会学领域的研究方法。对于欧共体来说,约定被视为价值评估、价值增值和协调的制度逻辑,欧共体强调价值秩序和价值的经验多元性,行为者依赖于此,制度建立在此基础上。特别是卫生、保健及其机构与价值问题和规范密切相关。由于可能的价值体系和价值秩序的多元性,紧张和批评是医疗保健系统中需要解决的重要经验现象。该贡献概述了欧经体在分析数据化、量化、分类(与卫生和卫生保健机构有关)、社会不平等以及卫生政策和卫生资本主义的价值观、医疗专业和伦理方面的主要立场和观点。此外,从欧共体的角度讨论了COVID-19大流行及其后果,最后概述了大流行时期的社会趋势和前景。1©2021,GESIS -莱布尼茨社会科学研究所。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。