Just two sides of the same coin? Ethical issues and discourses on covid-19 and ebola. a comparative literature analysis

S. Wilhelmy, Rebecca Ulrich, D. Gross
{"title":"Just two sides of the same coin? Ethical issues and discourses on covid-19 and ebola. a comparative literature analysis","authors":"S. Wilhelmy, Rebecca Ulrich, D. Gross","doi":"10.12759/hsr.46.2021.3.247-284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"»Nur zwei Seiten derselben Medaille? Ethische Fragen und Diskurse uber COVID-19 und Ebola. Eine vergleichende Literaturanalyse«. Infectious diseases pose a continuing threat to human life. In the case of pandemics, they can also grow into massive challenges for society as a whole – not only from a medical but also from an ethical perspective. This article takes the current COVID-19 pandemic as the occasion for an empirical medico-ethical analysis. It explores the ethical dimensions and discourses on COVID-19 and the Ebola epidemics (West Africa, Democratic Republic of Congo). Additional attention is paid to the question whether and to what extent the ethical issues raised differ and how the possible disparities can be explained. Using a methodo-logical two-step approach (systematic literature review;qualitative content analysis), we were able to identify nine categories that map the ethical dimensions of recent outbreaks of these two diseases: (1) Prioritization of health, (2) Equitable access to resources, (3) Adequate information, (4) Health worker vulnerability, (5) Stigma and discrimination, (6) Research ethics, (7) Measures restricting freedom, (8) Global health justice, (9) Environmental ethics. © 2021, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":47073,"journal":{"name":"Historical Social Research-Historische Sozialforschung","volume":"46 1","pages":"247-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Social Research-Historische Sozialforschung","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.46.2021.3.247-284","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

»Nur zwei Seiten derselben Medaille? Ethische Fragen und Diskurse uber COVID-19 und Ebola. Eine vergleichende Literaturanalyse«. Infectious diseases pose a continuing threat to human life. In the case of pandemics, they can also grow into massive challenges for society as a whole – not only from a medical but also from an ethical perspective. This article takes the current COVID-19 pandemic as the occasion for an empirical medico-ethical analysis. It explores the ethical dimensions and discourses on COVID-19 and the Ebola epidemics (West Africa, Democratic Republic of Congo). Additional attention is paid to the question whether and to what extent the ethical issues raised differ and how the possible disparities can be explained. Using a methodo-logical two-step approach (systematic literature review;qualitative content analysis), we were able to identify nine categories that map the ethical dimensions of recent outbreaks of these two diseases: (1) Prioritization of health, (2) Equitable access to resources, (3) Adequate information, (4) Health worker vulnerability, (5) Stigma and discrimination, (6) Research ethics, (7) Measures restricting freedom, (8) Global health justice, (9) Environmental ethics. © 2021, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. All rights reserved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
只是一枚硬币的两面吗?关于covid-19和埃博拉病毒的伦理问题和论述。比较文献分析
* * * * * * * * * *关于COVID-19和埃博拉病毒的道德与言论。文学分析[j]。传染病持续威胁着人类的生命。就流行病而言,它们也可能发展成为对整个社会的巨大挑战——不仅从医学角度,而且从伦理角度。本文以当前新冠肺炎疫情为契机,进行实证医学伦理分析。它探讨了COVID-19和埃博拉疫情(西非、刚果民主共和国)的伦理层面和话语。另外还注意到所提出的伦理问题是否不同以及在多大程度上不同,以及如何解释可能的差异。使用方法论的两步方法(系统文献回顾;定性内容分析),我们能够确定9个类别,这些类别描绘了这两种疾病最近爆发的伦理维度:(1)健康优先级,(2)公平获取资源,(3)充分的信息,(4)卫生工作者脆弱性,(5)污名和歧视,(6)研究伦理,(7)限制自由的措施,(8)全球卫生正义,(9)环境伦理。©2021,GESIS -莱布尼茨社会科学研究所。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erosion of Solidarity in France and Welfare Conventions: The New Role of Complementary Health Insurance. Economics of Convention Meets Canguilhem “Targeting Lifestyle" Conditions: What Justifications for Treatment? Medicine and economic knowledge : the relevance of career in the study of transformations in the healthcare system Perspectives on the economics and sociology of health. Contributions from the institutionalist approach of economics of convention – an introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1