An identity bias in phonotactics: Evidence from Cochabamba Quechua

IF 1.3 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Laboratory Phonology Pub Date : 2014-08-01 DOI:10.1515/lp-2014-0012
Gillian Gallagher
{"title":"An identity bias in phonotactics: Evidence from Cochabamba Quechua","authors":"Gillian Gallagher","doi":"10.1515/lp-2014-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Speakers of Cochabamba Quechua (CQ) participated in two tasks involving phonotactically illegal nonce forms with pairs of identical (e.g., [p'ap'u]) and non-identical ejectives (e.g., [k'ap'u]). In a repetition task, speakers were more accurate on identical than non-identical ejective pairs, though no asymmetry was found in an ABX discrimination task, nor in acoustic analysis of nonce roots with identical and non-identical ejective pairs. The latent preference for identical ejectives is unexpected given the phonotactics of CQ, which categorically disallows both identical and non-identical ejective pairs. The asymmetry is in accord with the typology, however. Many languages systematically exempt identical segments from a phonotactic restriction that applies to non-identical segments. It is argued that this cross-linguistic identity preference has its roots in a synchronic bias in favor of identical segments.","PeriodicalId":45128,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Phonology","volume":"5 1","pages":"337 - 378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/lp-2014-0012","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Phonology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2014-0012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Abstract Speakers of Cochabamba Quechua (CQ) participated in two tasks involving phonotactically illegal nonce forms with pairs of identical (e.g., [p'ap'u]) and non-identical ejectives (e.g., [k'ap'u]). In a repetition task, speakers were more accurate on identical than non-identical ejective pairs, though no asymmetry was found in an ABX discrimination task, nor in acoustic analysis of nonce roots with identical and non-identical ejective pairs. The latent preference for identical ejectives is unexpected given the phonotactics of CQ, which categorically disallows both identical and non-identical ejective pairs. The asymmetry is in accord with the typology, however. Many languages systematically exempt identical segments from a phonotactic restriction that applies to non-identical segments. It is argued that this cross-linguistic identity preference has its roots in a synchronic bias in favor of identical segments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语音战术中的身份偏见:来自科恰班巴克丘亚语的证据
科恰班巴克丘亚语(Cochabamba Quechua, CQ)的说话者参与了两项涉及语音上非法的nonce形式的任务,这些nonce形式有一对相同的形容词(例如,[p'ap'u])和非相同的形容词(例如,[k'ap'u])。在重复任务中,说话者对相同的弹射音对比不相同的弹射音对更准确,尽管在ABX辨别任务中没有发现不对称,在具有相同和不相同弹射音对的非once词根的声学分析中也没有发现不对称。考虑到CQ的语音策略,对相同射词的潜在偏好是意想不到的,它断然禁止相同和非相同射词对。然而,这种不对称与类型学是一致的。许多语言系统地使相同的音段不受适用于不相同音段的音位法限制。本文认为,这种跨语言认同偏好的根源在于对相同语段的共时性偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction: Production and perception across three Hong Kong Cantonese consonant mergers: Community- and individual-level perspectives Probing effects of lexical prosody on speech-gesture integration in prominence production by Swedish news presenters Production and perception across three Hong Kong Cantonese consonant mergers: Community- and individual-level perspectives Producing and Perceiving Socially Structured Coarticulation: Coarticulatory Nasalization in Afrikaans Measuring sign complexity: Comparing a model-driven and an error-driven approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1