The aerodynamic puzzle of nasalized fricatives: Aerodynamic and perceptual evidence from Scottish Gaelic

IF 1.3 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Laboratory Phonology Pub Date : 2015-05-01 DOI:10.1515/lp-2015-0007
N. Warner, Dan Brenner, Jessamyn Schertz, A. Carnie, Muriel Fisher, Michael Hammond
{"title":"The aerodynamic puzzle of nasalized fricatives: Aerodynamic and perceptual evidence from Scottish Gaelic","authors":"N. Warner, Dan Brenner, Jessamyn Schertz, A. Carnie, Muriel Fisher, Michael Hammond","doi":"10.1515/lp-2015-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Scottish Gaelic is sometimes described as having nasalized fricatives (/ṽ/ distinctively, and [f̃, x̃, h̃], etc. through assimilation). However, there are claims that it is not aerodynamically possible to open the velum for nasalization while maintaining frication noise. We present aerodynamic data from 14 native Scottish Gaelic speakers to determine how the posited nasalized fricatives in this language are realized. Most tokens demonstrate loss of nasalization, but nasalization does occur in some contexts without aerodynamic conflict, e.g., nasalization with the consonant realized as an approximant, nasalization of [h̃], nasalization on the preceding vowel, or sequential frication and nasalization. Furthermore, a very few tokens do contain simultaneous nasalization and frication with a trade-off in airflow. We also present perceptual evidence showing that Gaelic listeners can hear this distinction slightly better than chance. Thus, instrumental data from one of the few languages in the world described as having nasalized fricatives confirms that the claimed sounds are not made by producing strong nasalization concurrently with clear frication noise. Furthermore, although speakers most often neutralize the nasalization, when they maintain it, they do so through a variety of phonetic mechanisms, even within a single language.","PeriodicalId":45128,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Phonology","volume":"6 1","pages":"197 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/lp-2015-0007","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Phonology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2015-0007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Abstract Scottish Gaelic is sometimes described as having nasalized fricatives (/ṽ/ distinctively, and [f̃, x̃, h̃], etc. through assimilation). However, there are claims that it is not aerodynamically possible to open the velum for nasalization while maintaining frication noise. We present aerodynamic data from 14 native Scottish Gaelic speakers to determine how the posited nasalized fricatives in this language are realized. Most tokens demonstrate loss of nasalization, but nasalization does occur in some contexts without aerodynamic conflict, e.g., nasalization with the consonant realized as an approximant, nasalization of [h̃], nasalization on the preceding vowel, or sequential frication and nasalization. Furthermore, a very few tokens do contain simultaneous nasalization and frication with a trade-off in airflow. We also present perceptual evidence showing that Gaelic listeners can hear this distinction slightly better than chance. Thus, instrumental data from one of the few languages in the world described as having nasalized fricatives confirms that the claimed sounds are not made by producing strong nasalization concurrently with clear frication noise. Furthermore, although speakers most often neutralize the nasalization, when they maintain it, they do so through a variety of phonetic mechanisms, even within a single language.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻音摩擦音的空气动力学难题:来自苏格兰盖尔语的空气动力学和知觉证据
苏格兰盖尔语有时被描述为有鼻音化的摩擦音(通过同化而明显地/ /,和[f /, x /, h /]等)。然而,有人声称,在保持摩擦噪声的同时,在空气动力学上不可能打开膜片进行鼻化。我们提供了来自14位苏格兰盖尔语母语者的空气动力学数据,以确定该语言中假定的鼻音摩擦音是如何实现的。大多数符号都表现出鼻音化的缺失,但在一些没有空气动力学冲突的情况下,鼻音化确实会发生,例如,将辅音作为近音实现的鼻音化,[h]的鼻音化,前一个元音的鼻音化,或连续的摩擦和鼻音化。此外,很少的代币确实包含同时的鼻化和摩擦,并在气流中进行权衡。我们还提供了感知证据,表明盖尔语听众可以比偶然更好地听到这种区别。因此,来自世界上少数几种被描述为有鼻音摩擦音的语言之一的仪器数据证实,所声称的声音不是通过同时产生强烈的鼻音和明显的摩擦音而发出的。此外,尽管说话者通常会消除鼻音化,但当他们保持鼻音化时,他们会通过各种语音机制来做到这一点,甚至在同一种语言中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction: Production and perception across three Hong Kong Cantonese consonant mergers: Community- and individual-level perspectives Probing effects of lexical prosody on speech-gesture integration in prominence production by Swedish news presenters Production and perception across three Hong Kong Cantonese consonant mergers: Community- and individual-level perspectives Producing and Perceiving Socially Structured Coarticulation: Coarticulatory Nasalization in Afrikaans Measuring sign complexity: Comparing a model-driven and an error-driven approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1