S. K. Paul, A. Ghosh, M. H. Rashid, S. Sarkar, M. Sarkar, W. Soufan, M. Iqbal, V.S. JOHN SUNOJ, D. Ratnasekera, A. El Sabagh
{"title":"COB YIELD, NUTRITIONAL QUALITY AND HERBAGE PRODUCTIVITY OF BABY CORN AS INFLUENCED BY IRRIGATION AND INTEGRATED NUTRIENT FERTILIZATION","authors":"S. K. Paul, A. Ghosh, M. H. Rashid, S. Sarkar, M. Sarkar, W. Soufan, M. Iqbal, V.S. JOHN SUNOJ, D. Ratnasekera, A. El Sabagh","doi":"10.15666/aeer/2103_25772592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The optimization of plant nutrients and irrigation regimes hold potential to boost maize growth, cob yield, herbage biomass and revenue generation of maize. A field study was conducted to optimize irrigation and fertilization management for dual-purpose maize. The experiment was comprised four irrigation regimes viz. no irrigation (I 0 ), one irrigation 20 days after sowing (DAS) (I 1 ), two irrigations 20 and 40 DAS (I 2 ), and three irrigations 20, 40 and 60 DAS (I 3 ). The fertilization regimes included a treatment with recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) (275-125-80-125-8 kg ha -1 of nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, gypsum and sulfur) (F 1 ), poultry manure (PM) (5 t ha -1 ) (F 2 ), 75% RDF + PM (2.5 t ha -1 ) (F 3 ), and 50% RDF + PM (5 t ha -1 ) (F 4 ). Combination of I 3 and F 3 outperformed other treatment combinations in terms of most of the yield attributes such as plant height (177.72 cm), cob length with (8.36 cm) and without husk (1.62 cm), and cob (without husk) yield (3.86 t ha -1 ). This treatment combination also produced maize with the highest protein content of leaves and cobs. However, the highest green herbage yield (29.99 t ha -1 ) was recorded with I 1 ×F 1 , which remained at par with I 1 ×F 3 . It took 20 additional days for crop switching from fodder harvest to attain baby corn maturity. The economic analysis revealed that I 3 ×F 3 treatment combination generated the greatest economic revenue.","PeriodicalId":7975,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ecology and Environmental Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ecology and Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/2103_25772592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
. The optimization of plant nutrients and irrigation regimes hold potential to boost maize growth, cob yield, herbage biomass and revenue generation of maize. A field study was conducted to optimize irrigation and fertilization management for dual-purpose maize. The experiment was comprised four irrigation regimes viz. no irrigation (I 0 ), one irrigation 20 days after sowing (DAS) (I 1 ), two irrigations 20 and 40 DAS (I 2 ), and three irrigations 20, 40 and 60 DAS (I 3 ). The fertilization regimes included a treatment with recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) (275-125-80-125-8 kg ha -1 of nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, gypsum and sulfur) (F 1 ), poultry manure (PM) (5 t ha -1 ) (F 2 ), 75% RDF + PM (2.5 t ha -1 ) (F 3 ), and 50% RDF + PM (5 t ha -1 ) (F 4 ). Combination of I 3 and F 3 outperformed other treatment combinations in terms of most of the yield attributes such as plant height (177.72 cm), cob length with (8.36 cm) and without husk (1.62 cm), and cob (without husk) yield (3.86 t ha -1 ). This treatment combination also produced maize with the highest protein content of leaves and cobs. However, the highest green herbage yield (29.99 t ha -1 ) was recorded with I 1 ×F 1 , which remained at par with I 1 ×F 3 . It took 20 additional days for crop switching from fodder harvest to attain baby corn maturity. The economic analysis revealed that I 3 ×F 3 treatment combination generated the greatest economic revenue.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes original research papers and review articles. Researchers from all countries are invited to publish pure or applied ecological, environmental, biogeographical, zoological, botanical, paleontological, biometrical-biomathematical and quantitative ecological or multidisciplinary agricultural research of international interest on its pages.
The focus is on topics such as:
-Community, ecosystem and global ecology-
Biometrics, theoretical- and quantitative ecology-
Multidisciplinary agricultural and environmental research-
Sustainable and organic agriculture, natural resource management-
Ecological methodology, monitoring and modeling-
Biodiversity and ecosystem research, microbiology, botany and zoology-
Biostatistics and modeling in epidemiology, public health and veterinary-
Earth history, paleontology, extinctions, biogeography, biogeochemistry-
Conservation biology, environmental protection-
Ecological economics, natural capital and ecosystem services-
Climatology, meteorology, climate change, climate-ecology.
The Journal publishes theoretical papers as well as application-oriented contributions and practical case studies. There is no bias with regard to taxon or geographical area. Purely descriptive papers (like only taxonomic lists) will not be accepted for publication.