Development of a Diet Quality Score for Infants and Toddlers and its association with weight.

Elaine M Ríos, Olga Sinigaglia, Beatriz Diaz, Maribel Campos, Cristina Palacios
{"title":"Development of a Diet Quality Score for Infants and Toddlers and its association with weight.","authors":"Elaine M Ríos, Olga Sinigaglia, Beatriz Diaz, Maribel Campos, Cristina Palacios","doi":"10.15226/jnhfs.2016.00171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create a Diet Quality Index Score (DQIS) for infants and toddlers and to assess its relative validity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Three DQIS were created (0-5, 8-11 and 12-24 months) based on a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Nine components were included, scored from 0 (inadequate) to 5 (adequate consumption) based on guidelines for timing of food's introduction and portion sizes; the component on breastfeeding (Yes/No) was scored (0-15). Infants 6-7 months were excluded as new foods are introduced during this period. The total score (0-55 points) was categorized as Excellent (≥45), Good (35-44), Needs improvement (25-34), and Poor (<25). Relative validity was assessed against weight status among a sample of 296 children using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In infants 0-5 months (n=100), mean DQIS was 42.4±9.3 and 52% had 'Excellent' diets. In infants 8-11 months (n=42), mean DQIS was 36.1±7.7 and most had 'Good' diets (47.6%). Among toddlers 12-24 months (n=117), mean DQIS was 25.7±8.0 and most had 'Poor' diets (50.4%). There was a trend for a higher odd of Excessive weight in those with 'Poor' diets compared to those with 'Excellent' diets, after controlling for confounders (OR 2.01; 95% CI: 0.85, 5.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These scores could be used to assess diet quality in infants and toddlers. There was a trend for a higher odd of Excessive weight among those with 'Poor' diets. To our knowledge, this is the first algorithm for the assessment of diet quality in infants and toddlers considering intake of each food group and their portion sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":90609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nutritional health & food science","volume":"4 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5283385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nutritional health & food science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15226/jnhfs.2016.00171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To create a Diet Quality Index Score (DQIS) for infants and toddlers and to assess its relative validity.

Design: Three DQIS were created (0-5, 8-11 and 12-24 months) based on a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Nine components were included, scored from 0 (inadequate) to 5 (adequate consumption) based on guidelines for timing of food's introduction and portion sizes; the component on breastfeeding (Yes/No) was scored (0-15). Infants 6-7 months were excluded as new foods are introduced during this period. The total score (0-55 points) was categorized as Excellent (≥45), Good (35-44), Needs improvement (25-34), and Poor (<25). Relative validity was assessed against weight status among a sample of 296 children using logistic regression.

Results: In infants 0-5 months (n=100), mean DQIS was 42.4±9.3 and 52% had 'Excellent' diets. In infants 8-11 months (n=42), mean DQIS was 36.1±7.7 and most had 'Good' diets (47.6%). Among toddlers 12-24 months (n=117), mean DQIS was 25.7±8.0 and most had 'Poor' diets (50.4%). There was a trend for a higher odd of Excessive weight in those with 'Poor' diets compared to those with 'Excellent' diets, after controlling for confounders (OR 2.01; 95% CI: 0.85, 5.18).

Conclusions: These scores could be used to assess diet quality in infants and toddlers. There was a trend for a higher odd of Excessive weight among those with 'Poor' diets. To our knowledge, this is the first algorithm for the assessment of diet quality in infants and toddlers considering intake of each food group and their portion sizes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定婴幼儿饮食质量评分及其与体重的关系。
目的:为婴幼儿创建饮食质量指数评分(DQIS),并评估其相对有效性:为婴幼儿创建饮食质量指数(DQIS),并评估其相对有效性:设计:根据经过验证的食物频率问卷(FFQ),创建了三个 DQIS(0-5 个月、8-11 个月和 12-24 个月)。其中包括九项内容,根据食物引入时间和份量指南,从 0 分(摄入不足)到 5 分(摄入充足)不等;母乳喂养内容(是/否)的评分为 0-15 分。6-7个月的婴儿不包括在内,因为这一时期会添加新的食物。总分(0-55 分)分为优(≥45 分)、良(35-44 分)、需改进(25-34 分)和差(结果:0-5 个月婴儿(100 人)的 DQIS 平均值为 42.4±9.3,52% 的婴儿饮食为 "优"。在 8-11 个月的婴儿(42 人)中,DQIS 平均值为 36.1±7.7,大多数婴儿的饮食为 "良好"(47.6%)。在 12-24 个月的学步儿童(人数=117)中,DQIS 的平均值为 25.7±8.0,大多数饮食习惯为 "差"(50.4%)。在控制了混杂因素后(OR 2.01; 95% CI: 0.85, 5.18),与饮食 "优良 "的幼儿相比,饮食 "不良 "的幼儿体重超标的几率呈上升趋势:这些评分可用于评估婴幼儿的饮食质量。结论:这些评分可用于评估婴幼儿的饮食质量,饮食 "差 "的婴幼儿体重超标的几率较高。据我们所知,这是第一种评估婴幼儿饮食质量的算法,它考虑到了每类食物的摄入量及其份量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nutritional Health: Strategies for Disease Prevention Prevalence and Associated Factors of Vitamin A Deficiency among Children and Women in Senegal Seasonal Variation of Nutritional Intake from 24-Hour Urine Collection and Adherence in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Extraction and Antioxidant Activity Evaluation of Polyphenols of Brown Rice Tea from Japonica Rice and Indica Rice The Anti-Obesity Effect of Kaempferia Parviflora (KP) is Attributed to Leptin in Adipose Tissue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1