Effectiveness of the 6 × 6 Dieet® in Obese DMT2 Patients Effectiveness of a Very Low Carbohydrate Ketogenic Diet Compared to a Low Carbohydrate and Energy-Restricted Diet in Overweight/Obese Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Govers E, Otten A, Schuiling B, Bouwman W, Lourens A, Visscher Tls
{"title":"Effectiveness of the 6 × 6 Dieet® in Obese DMT2 Patients Effectiveness of a Very Low Carbohydrate Ketogenic Diet Compared to a Low Carbohydrate and Energy-Restricted Diet in Overweight/Obese Type 2 Diabetes Patients","authors":"Govers E, Otten A, Schuiling B, Bouwman W, Lourens A, Visscher Tls","doi":"10.16966/2380-548x.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: More than a million people in the Netherlands suffer from type 2 diabetes mellitus; 80 percent is overweight or obese. Weight loss through diet is important; low carb diets are increasingly popular in diabetes management. Objective: From preliminary results we concluded that the 6 × 6 dieet® (a very low carbohydrate ketogenic diet) was more effective in patients with type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity than other diets. To prove its effectivity, we compared the 6 × 6 dieet® (6 × 6) to a moderate Low Carb Diet (LCD) and an Energy-Restricted Diabetes diet (ERD). Design: A retrospective three-arm study in dietitian practices to reduce weight; HBA1C; and use of medication in overweight/obese adults with type 2 diabetes on 6 × 6 (VLCKD); a 50-100 grams/day LCD; an energy restricted diabetes diet at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results: Data of 344 (n=110; 123; 111 in each study arm) patients from 16 practices were analyzed. More weight loss was seen in patients on 6 × 6, both at a 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up than in patients on LCD or ERD (all p-values <0.05). A total of 34.5% of patients on 6 × 6 turned their HbA1c levels to a value <43 mmol/mol after 12-months follow-up which was a higher proportion than in the LCD study arm (p=0.14) and the ERD study arm (p<0.01). The percentage of patients that stopped or reduced their use of Metformin, SU derivatives or Insulin was larger in the 6 × 6 study arm than in the LCD ad ERD study arms, reaching statistical significance when comparing 6 × 6 with ERD. Conclusions: 6 × 6 was more effective than LCD or ERD in overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes regarding weight loss, remission of type 2 diabetes, HbA1c-levels, and the reduction of diabetes medication.","PeriodicalId":73446,"journal":{"name":"International journal of endocrinology and metabolic disorders","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of endocrinology and metabolic disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16966/2380-548x.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: More than a million people in the Netherlands suffer from type 2 diabetes mellitus; 80 percent is overweight or obese. Weight loss through diet is important; low carb diets are increasingly popular in diabetes management. Objective: From preliminary results we concluded that the 6 × 6 dieet® (a very low carbohydrate ketogenic diet) was more effective in patients with type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity than other diets. To prove its effectivity, we compared the 6 × 6 dieet® (6 × 6) to a moderate Low Carb Diet (LCD) and an Energy-Restricted Diabetes diet (ERD). Design: A retrospective three-arm study in dietitian practices to reduce weight; HBA1C; and use of medication in overweight/obese adults with type 2 diabetes on 6 × 6 (VLCKD); a 50-100 grams/day LCD; an energy restricted diabetes diet at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results: Data of 344 (n=110; 123; 111 in each study arm) patients from 16 practices were analyzed. More weight loss was seen in patients on 6 × 6, both at a 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up than in patients on LCD or ERD (all p-values <0.05). A total of 34.5% of patients on 6 × 6 turned their HbA1c levels to a value <43 mmol/mol after 12-months follow-up which was a higher proportion than in the LCD study arm (p=0.14) and the ERD study arm (p<0.01). The percentage of patients that stopped or reduced their use of Metformin, SU derivatives or Insulin was larger in the 6 × 6 study arm than in the LCD ad ERD study arms, reaching statistical significance when comparing 6 × 6 with ERD. Conclusions: 6 × 6 was more effective than LCD or ERD in overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes regarding weight loss, remission of type 2 diabetes, HbA1c-levels, and the reduction of diabetes medication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极低碳水化合物生酮饮食与低碳水化合物和能量限制饮食在超重/肥胖2型糖尿病患者中的效果
背景:荷兰有超过100万人患有2型糖尿病;80%的人超重或肥胖。通过饮食减肥很重要;低碳水化合物饮食在糖尿病管理中越来越受欢迎。目的:从初步结果我们得出结论,6 × 6饮食®(一种极低碳水化合物生酮饮食)对2型糖尿病和超重或肥胖患者比其他饮食更有效。为了证明其有效性,我们将6 × 6饮食®(6 × 6)与中等低碳水化合物饮食(LCD)和能量限制糖尿病饮食(ERD)进行了比较。设计:一项关于营养师减肥实践的回顾性三组研究;糖化血红蛋白;超重/肥胖成人2型糖尿病6 × 6 (VLCKD)患者的用药情况;50-100克/天LCD;在第3、6和12个月时进行能量限制糖尿病饮食。结果:344例(n=110;123;分析了来自16个诊所的111例患者(每个研究组)。在随访3、6和12个月时,服用6 × 6的患者比服用LCD或ERD的患者体重减轻更多(p值均<0.05)。6 × 6组患者随访12个月后,HbA1c <43 mmol/mol的比例为34.5%,高于LCD组(p=0.14)和ERD组(p<0.01)。6 × 6研究组中停止或减少使用二甲双胍、SU衍生物或胰岛素的患者比例大于LCD和ERD研究组,与ERD比较具有统计学意义。结论:6 × 6在超重或肥胖2型糖尿病患者体重减轻、2型糖尿病缓解、hba1c水平和糖尿病用药减少方面比LCD或ERD更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel Methylcobalamin Nasal Spray versus Intramuscular Injection: A Randomized, Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study Rapid and Safe Correction of Vitamin B12 Deficiency using Novel Methylcobalamin Nasal Spray Influence of Dental Treatment on Outcome of Graves’ Disease Treated with Anti-Thyroid Drug Advocacy for Carbomedtherapy (Carbon Dioxide Therapy) in the Treatment of Diabetic Neuropathy TRAB Measurements: Ready for Prime Time?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1