A cross sectional study to estimate delay in diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis (TB) among patients attending urban health centre in an urban slum area

S. Patel, N. Lilhore, S. Kuwatada
{"title":"A cross sectional study to estimate delay in diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis (TB) among patients attending urban health centre in an urban slum area","authors":"S. Patel, N. Lilhore, S. Kuwatada","doi":"10.17511/ijphr.2018.i1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: RNTCP (Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program) is an application in India of the (World Health Organisation) WHO recommended (Directly Observed Treatment Short Course) DOTS strategy. Early diagnosis and immediate initiation of treatment are essential for an effective TB control program. Delay under RNTC programme is of types: patients delay, health care systems delay, DOTS delay and total delay. Objectives: To determine average delay on part of patient and health system in diagnosis of tuberculosis, treatment delay in starting DOTS and total delay. Methodology: A cross-sectional descriptive study of 464 tuberculosis patients was conducted in an urban health center (UHC) of an urban slum area of Mumbai. Patients registered under RNTCP during 1 year i.e. from 1 st January to 31 st December 2016 were interviewed regarding their complaints and reporting to a health care facility (time taken and type-private or government), time taken for diagnosis and starting treatment. Thus, four types of delay were calculated. Results: Among 464 patients, mean patient’s delay, health system delay and total delay were 21.09 days (median 15), 14.41 days (median 6) and 35.50 days (median 21) respectively. Almost 60% of total delay was constituted from patient’s delay. Mean treatment delay was 2.84 days (median 3.19). Total delay was significantly longerin females. Almost, 40% of the patients reported to a health facility within 15 days of onset of symptoms. Conclusion: Patient delay was significantly more among sputum negative pulmonary TB patients than sputum positive patients. Health system delay to diagnose TB was more if private practitioners were approached first. Only 11% (35) pulmonary TB patients were advised sputum examination as the first investigation by private practitioners.","PeriodicalId":91099,"journal":{"name":"International journal of public health research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of public health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17511/ijphr.2018.i1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: RNTCP (Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program) is an application in India of the (World Health Organisation) WHO recommended (Directly Observed Treatment Short Course) DOTS strategy. Early diagnosis and immediate initiation of treatment are essential for an effective TB control program. Delay under RNTC programme is of types: patients delay, health care systems delay, DOTS delay and total delay. Objectives: To determine average delay on part of patient and health system in diagnosis of tuberculosis, treatment delay in starting DOTS and total delay. Methodology: A cross-sectional descriptive study of 464 tuberculosis patients was conducted in an urban health center (UHC) of an urban slum area of Mumbai. Patients registered under RNTCP during 1 year i.e. from 1 st January to 31 st December 2016 were interviewed regarding their complaints and reporting to a health care facility (time taken and type-private or government), time taken for diagnosis and starting treatment. Thus, four types of delay were calculated. Results: Among 464 patients, mean patient’s delay, health system delay and total delay were 21.09 days (median 15), 14.41 days (median 6) and 35.50 days (median 21) respectively. Almost 60% of total delay was constituted from patient’s delay. Mean treatment delay was 2.84 days (median 3.19). Total delay was significantly longerin females. Almost, 40% of the patients reported to a health facility within 15 days of onset of symptoms. Conclusion: Patient delay was significantly more among sputum negative pulmonary TB patients than sputum positive patients. Health system delay to diagnose TB was more if private practitioners were approached first. Only 11% (35) pulmonary TB patients were advised sputum examination as the first investigation by private practitioners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项横断面研究,以估计在城市贫民窟地区的城市保健中心就诊的患者诊断和治疗结核病的延误
背景:修订后的国家结核病控制规划(RNTCP)是世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐的短程直接观察治疗(DOTS)战略在印度的应用。早期诊断和立即开始治疗对于有效的结核病控制规划至关重要。RNTC规划下的延迟有几种类型:患者延迟、卫生保健系统延迟、直接督导下短程化疗延迟和总体延迟。目的:确定部分患者和卫生系统在结核病诊断上的平均延误、DOTS启动的治疗延误和总延误。方法:在孟买城市贫民窟的城市卫生中心(UHC)对464名结核病患者进行了横断面描述性研究。在一年内,即2016年1月1日至12月31日期间,在RNTCP下登记的患者接受了采访,内容涉及他们的投诉和向医疗机构报告(花费的时间和类型——私人或政府)、诊断和开始治疗所花费的时间。因此,计算了四种类型的延迟。结果:464例患者中,患者延迟、卫生系统延迟和总延迟的平均时间分别为21.09天(中位数15)、14.41天(中位数6)和35.50天(中位数21)。几乎60%的总延误是由患者延误构成的。平均治疗延迟为2.84天(中位3.19天)。女性的总延迟明显更长。近40%的患者在出现症状后15天内向卫生机构报告。结论:痰液阴性肺结核患者的患者延误明显多于痰液阳性肺结核患者。如果首先联系私人医生,则卫生系统诊断结核病的延迟更大。仅有11%(35例)的肺结核患者被私人医生建议进行首次痰检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Tingkah Laku Komuniti Sungai Klang Terhadap Pencemaran Sungai The Benefits and Challenges of Paper Handheld Maternal Record in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review Is Occupational Arsenic Exposure a Possible Causative Agent of Breast Cancer for a Young Female Laboratory Technician? A Case-Study Methodology of National Health and Morbidity Study (NHMS): Adolescent Health, Malaysia 2022 Environmental Factors of Commuting Accidents among Firefighter Drivers in Peninsular Malaysia: A Case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1