Some Comments on Interpreting the Dark-Surfaced Handmade Burnished Pottery of the 13th and 12th Century BCE Aegean

IF 1.7 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Pub Date : 2016-03-02 DOI:10.1558/JMEA.V3I1.29836
J. Rutter
{"title":"Some Comments on Interpreting the Dark-Surfaced Handmade Burnished Pottery of the 13th and 12th Century BCE Aegean","authors":"J. Rutter","doi":"10.1558/JMEA.V3I1.29836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"David Small's attempt (JMA this issue) to explain the appearance, at major centers in the late Minoan-Mycenaean world, of dark-surfaced, handmade, and burnished vessels as a response to economic stress by native Aegean smallholders is reviewed. With the possible exception of the terminal Mycenaean material from Kalapodi in Phocis, Small's hypothesis fails to explain the ceramic data presently known: the novel pottery in question is distinguished not merely by its technology but also by a typology of shape and decoration which Small has ignored because he mistakenly considers it more or less universal in the context of a household mode of production. \nA brief review of such issues as this handmade pottery's distribution, frequency, impact on native Aegean wheelmade wares, and function(s) within the Minoan-Mycenaean world leads to the conclusion that past evaluations of the origins and significance of this material have probably been unduly oversimplified. Future progress on addressing these and related questions is dependent on fuller publication of this fundamentally non-Aegean pottery in the Minoan and Aegean contexts in which it has been found.","PeriodicalId":45203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology","volume":"3 1","pages":"29-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/JMEA.V3I1.29836","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

David Small's attempt (JMA this issue) to explain the appearance, at major centers in the late Minoan-Mycenaean world, of dark-surfaced, handmade, and burnished vessels as a response to economic stress by native Aegean smallholders is reviewed. With the possible exception of the terminal Mycenaean material from Kalapodi in Phocis, Small's hypothesis fails to explain the ceramic data presently known: the novel pottery in question is distinguished not merely by its technology but also by a typology of shape and decoration which Small has ignored because he mistakenly considers it more or less universal in the context of a household mode of production. A brief review of such issues as this handmade pottery's distribution, frequency, impact on native Aegean wheelmade wares, and function(s) within the Minoan-Mycenaean world leads to the conclusion that past evaluations of the origins and significance of this material have probably been unduly oversimplified. Future progress on addressing these and related questions is dependent on fuller publication of this fundamentally non-Aegean pottery in the Minoan and Aegean contexts in which it has been found.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对公元前13、12世纪爱琴海暗面手工抛光陶器的解读
David Small试图解释在米诺斯-迈锡尼世界晚期的主要中心出现的深色表面,手工制作和抛光的容器,作为对当地爱琴海小农经济压力的回应。可能除了来自福基斯卡拉波迪的迈锡尼晚期材料之外,斯莫尔的假设未能解释目前已知的陶瓷数据:所讨论的新型陶器不仅以其技术而闻名,而且还以其形状和装饰的类型而闻名,斯莫尔忽略了这一点,因为他错误地认为它或多或少在家庭生产方式的背景下是普遍的。对这种手工陶器的分布、使用频率、对爱琴海本土轮制陶器的影响以及在米诺斯-迈锡尼世界中的作用等问题进行简要回顾,就会得出这样的结论:过去对这种材料的起源和意义的评估可能过于简单化了。解决这些问题和相关问题的未来进展取决于在米诺斯和爱琴海环境中发现的这种基本非爱琴海陶器的更全面的出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: JMA currently operates as the most progressive and valid podium for archaeological discussion and debate in Europe European Journal of Archaeology Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology is the only journal currently published that deals with the entire multicultural world of Mediterranean archaeology. The journal publishes material that deals with, amongst others, the social, politicoeconomic and ideological aspects of local or regional production and development, and of social interaction and change in the Mediterranean.
期刊最新文献
Diverging Paths A Necessary Debate Myopic Misunderstandings? Vitamin D Status among the Population Visiting Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Bhutan. Supplementary Materials for 'From the Ground Up: Modelling Agricultural Landscapes in Early Iron Age East Crete Using Legacy Survey Data and GIS'
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1