A Teoria da Modernização aplica-se à América Latina? Um estudo do século XIX ao XXI

Q3 Social Sciences Revista de Sociologia e Politica Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1678-987320287301
T. Lopes, Fernanda Esperidião, M. Castro
{"title":"A Teoria da Modernização aplica-se à América Latina? Um estudo do século XIX ao XXI","authors":"T. Lopes, Fernanda Esperidião, M. Castro","doi":"10.1590/1678-987320287301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We investigate the relationship between economic development, measured by real GDP per capita, and levels of democracy in Latin American countries from 1870 to 2010, empirically testing the Seymour M. Lipset hypothesis proposed in “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political”, published in 1959 by The American Political Science Review. Materials and Methods: An econometric model known as an ordered probit was estimated. Democracy data were obtained from the measurement made by Polity IV. For the GDP per capita, the Angus Maddison Project database was used. The proxies for human capital were built by Morrisson and Murtin and are described in the article \"The Century of Education\" (2009). Results: The Modernization Theory is valid for countries with an intermediate level of democracy. For this group of nations, there was also a non-linear effect; that is, those poorer countries, when faced with an increase in GDP per capita, are more likely to have a lower level of democracy. However, this probability is inverted as GDP per capita expands. Discussion: The work simultaneously fills three gaps in the published works on the theme. (i) Contrary to the way most of them use the proxy for democracy, in our study it is not a binary variable. (ii) The time horizon is broader, since we have worked with data since the end of the 19th century. (iii) The regional scope, given that we take into account the particularities of Latin America. Our results partially prove the theory of modernization in Latin American countries, in addition to identifying which levels of democracy would be most likely in the face of a high level of income. KEYWORKDS: Modernization Theory; Economic Development; Democracy; Latin America; Seymour M. Lipset. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. A produção desse manuscrito foi viabilizada através do patrocínio fornecido pelo Centro Universitário Internacional Uninter à Revista de Sociologia e Política. A Teoria da Modernização aplica-se à América Latina? 17/19","PeriodicalId":35300,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Sociologia e Politica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Sociologia e Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987320287301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We investigate the relationship between economic development, measured by real GDP per capita, and levels of democracy in Latin American countries from 1870 to 2010, empirically testing the Seymour M. Lipset hypothesis proposed in “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political”, published in 1959 by The American Political Science Review. Materials and Methods: An econometric model known as an ordered probit was estimated. Democracy data were obtained from the measurement made by Polity IV. For the GDP per capita, the Angus Maddison Project database was used. The proxies for human capital were built by Morrisson and Murtin and are described in the article "The Century of Education" (2009). Results: The Modernization Theory is valid for countries with an intermediate level of democracy. For this group of nations, there was also a non-linear effect; that is, those poorer countries, when faced with an increase in GDP per capita, are more likely to have a lower level of democracy. However, this probability is inverted as GDP per capita expands. Discussion: The work simultaneously fills three gaps in the published works on the theme. (i) Contrary to the way most of them use the proxy for democracy, in our study it is not a binary variable. (ii) The time horizon is broader, since we have worked with data since the end of the 19th century. (iii) The regional scope, given that we take into account the particularities of Latin America. Our results partially prove the theory of modernization in Latin American countries, in addition to identifying which levels of democracy would be most likely in the face of a high level of income. KEYWORKDS: Modernization Theory; Economic Development; Democracy; Latin America; Seymour M. Lipset. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. A produção desse manuscrito foi viabilizada através do patrocínio fornecido pelo Centro Universitário Internacional Uninter à Revista de Sociologia e Política. A Teoria da Modernização aplica-se à América Latina? 17/19
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代化理论适用于拉丁美洲吗?19世纪到21世纪的研究
引言:我们研究了1870年至2010年间拉丁美洲国家的经济发展(以实际人均GDP衡量)与民主水平之间的关系,实证检验了Seymour M. Lipset在《民主的一些社会先决条件:经济发展与政治》(1959年发表于《美国政治科学评论》)中提出的假设。材料和方法:一个计量经济学模型被称为有序概率估计。民主数据来自Polity IV的测量。对于人均GDP,使用Angus Maddison Project数据库。人力资本的代理由Morrisson和Murtin建立,并在文章“教育的世纪”(2009)中进行了描述。结果:现代化理论对中等民主水平的国家是有效的。对于这组国家,也存在非线性效应;也就是说,那些较贫穷的国家,当面对人均GDP的增长时,更有可能拥有较低的民主水平。然而,随着人均GDP的增长,这种可能性是相反的。讨论:作品同时填补了已发表的主题作品的三个空白。(i)与他们大多数人使用民主代理的方式相反,在我们的研究中,它不是一个二元变量。(ii)时间范围更广,因为我们从19世纪末就开始使用数据。(三)区域范围,因为我们考虑到拉丁美洲的特殊性。我们的研究结果在一定程度上证明了拉美国家的现代化理论,并确定了在面对高收入水平时,哪些水平的民主最有可能实现。关键词:现代化理论;经济发展;民主;拉丁美洲;西摩·m·利普塞特。这是一篇在知识共享署名非商业许可条款下发布的开放获取文章,该许可允许不受限制的非商业使用、分发和在任何媒体上复制,只要原始作品被适当引用。一个producao desse manuscrito信息自由viabilizada atraves做patrocinio fornecido pelo Centro国际队Uninter大学一个航空杂志上Sociologia e政治。A Teoria da modernizaprada - o application -se - comamicica Latina?17/19
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Sociologia e Politica
Revista de Sociologia e Politica Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Sociologia e Política is a bi-annual publication of the Political Science staff of the Departament of Social Sciences of the Paraná Federal University, in Brazil. Created in 1993, it appears in the months of June and November. Open to scientific debate, the Revista de Sociologia e Política intends to be a pluralist space to divulge the results of substantive research, mainly of sociologists and political scientists. It publishes, preferably in Portuguese, original articles and critical reviews of recently edited works. The Revista de Sociologia e Política give priority to manuscripts whose main theme pertains to politics and the political.
期刊最新文献
Perfil dos conservadores e dos progressistas brasileiros: uma abordagem baseada na teoria dos valores humanos Reavaliando a contribuição do “Paradoxo” de Condorcet para a moderna análise da política A política externa brasileira a partir da imprensa: um estudo exploratório sobre o enquadramento dos principais jornais brasileiros Leyes electorales y diversidad de atributos sociodemográficos de los legisladores: Chile, 2013-2017 Nem formal, nem informal: a diversidade das práticas nas organizações partidárias brasileiras
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1