Interfaces das interfaces socioestatais: ouvidorias, conselhos gestores e Facebooks governamentais

Q3 Social Sciences Revista de Sociologia e Politica Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1678-987320287405
L. Lüchmann
{"title":"Interfaces das interfaces socioestatais: ouvidorias, conselhos gestores e Facebooks governamentais","authors":"L. Lüchmann","doi":"10.1590/1678-987320287405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The work aims to analyze the articulations between three different types of interfaces between State and society: ombudsmen, management councils and government Facebooks. Materials and Methods: The study is based on the mapping of these interfaces in three different areas of public policies: health, social assistance and environment and at two levels of government (Santa Catarina State Government and Florianópolis City Hall). Based on a general mapping of the interfaces identified on the respective pages of the Government Departments, the research included document analysis, interviews, survey of records in Council minutes and government Facebook posts. Results: Taking dimensions as attributions, competences, institutional design, area of public policies and the role of political, bureaucratic and social actors as an analytical base, the research identified important differences in the greater or lesser capacity for dialogue between the three modalities of socio-state interface, with positive highlight for councils in the areas of health and social assistance. Discussion: The research presents an advance in studies on socio-state interfaces, extending, in addition to participatory institutions, the modalities of society's participation in government agencies. Despite the limited scope of the study, especially when considering the complexity and variety of participatory programs and devices within government agencies and structures and local and regional specificities, the article reinforces the importance of expanding, in a relational way, the understanding of this phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":35300,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Sociologia e Politica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Sociologia e Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987320287405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: The work aims to analyze the articulations between three different types of interfaces between State and society: ombudsmen, management councils and government Facebooks. Materials and Methods: The study is based on the mapping of these interfaces in three different areas of public policies: health, social assistance and environment and at two levels of government (Santa Catarina State Government and Florianópolis City Hall). Based on a general mapping of the interfaces identified on the respective pages of the Government Departments, the research included document analysis, interviews, survey of records in Council minutes and government Facebook posts. Results: Taking dimensions as attributions, competences, institutional design, area of public policies and the role of political, bureaucratic and social actors as an analytical base, the research identified important differences in the greater or lesser capacity for dialogue between the three modalities of socio-state interface, with positive highlight for councils in the areas of health and social assistance. Discussion: The research presents an advance in studies on socio-state interfaces, extending, in addition to participatory institutions, the modalities of society's participation in government agencies. Despite the limited scope of the study, especially when considering the complexity and variety of participatory programs and devices within government agencies and structures and local and regional specificities, the article reinforces the importance of expanding, in a relational way, the understanding of this phenomenon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会国家界面的界面:监察员、管理委员会和政府脸书
引言:该工作旨在分析国家与社会之间三种不同类型的接口之间的联系:监察员、管理委员会和政府facebook。材料和方法:这项研究的基础是在三个不同的公共政策领域(卫生、社会援助和环境)和两级政府(圣卡塔琳娜州政府和Florianópolis市政厅)绘制这些界面。根据政府部门各自网页上的界面的一般映射,研究包括文件分析、访谈、调查议会会议记录和政府Facebook帖子。结果:研究以归因、能力、体制设计、公共政策领域以及政治、官僚和社会行为者的作用等维度为分析基础,确定了社会-国家界面的三种模式之间在或大或小的对话能力方面的重要差异,并积极强调了卫生和社会援助领域的理事会。讨论:该研究在社会-国家界面研究方面取得了进展,除了参与性机构之外,还扩展了社会参与政府机构的模式。尽管研究的范围有限,特别是考虑到政府机构和结构中参与性项目和设备的复杂性和多样性,以及地方和区域的特殊性,但本文强调了以一种关系的方式扩大对这一现象的理解的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Sociologia e Politica
Revista de Sociologia e Politica Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Sociologia e Política is a bi-annual publication of the Political Science staff of the Departament of Social Sciences of the Paraná Federal University, in Brazil. Created in 1993, it appears in the months of June and November. Open to scientific debate, the Revista de Sociologia e Política intends to be a pluralist space to divulge the results of substantive research, mainly of sociologists and political scientists. It publishes, preferably in Portuguese, original articles and critical reviews of recently edited works. The Revista de Sociologia e Política give priority to manuscripts whose main theme pertains to politics and the political.
期刊最新文献
Perfil dos conservadores e dos progressistas brasileiros: uma abordagem baseada na teoria dos valores humanos Reavaliando a contribuição do “Paradoxo” de Condorcet para a moderna análise da política A política externa brasileira a partir da imprensa: um estudo exploratório sobre o enquadramento dos principais jornais brasileiros Leyes electorales y diversidad de atributos sociodemográficos de los legisladores: Chile, 2013-2017 Nem formal, nem informal: a diversidade das práticas nas organizações partidárias brasileiras
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1