Critical Biblical Studies is Here to Stay

Erin Runions
{"title":"Critical Biblical Studies is Here to Stay","authors":"Erin Runions","doi":"10.2104/BCT.V11I2.658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The six essays in The Bible & Critical Theory 11.2 (2015) brilliantly demonstrate the scholarship that characterizes an emerging area in Religious Studies—let’s call it critical biblical studies, or more broadly, critical scriptural studies. This work analyzes the way biblical texts reflect and sustain contemporary and ancient power dynamics, political regimes, cultural norms, violences, performative practices, as well as resistances. In its attempt to critique dominant structures, critical biblical studies differs from other important areas of biblical study, those more bounded in their aims (such as solely historical, literary, or theoretical approaches); further, it resists the transcendent closure of using the Bible for theological construction. The subfield has been developing for some time. The Bible & Critical Theory has been an important platform for it, along with Postscripts: A Journal for Sacred Texts and Contemporary Worlds, the Institute for Signifying Scripture, and a growing number of sections at the Society of Biblical Literature, including the many perspectival, contextual, philosophical, and ideological critical sections. The Babylon Complex (Runions 2014), was written with the benefit of these conversations, and I am grateful to be able to respond to these productive engagements with it.","PeriodicalId":53382,"journal":{"name":"The Bible and Critical Theory","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bible and Critical Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2104/BCT.V11I2.658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The six essays in The Bible & Critical Theory 11.2 (2015) brilliantly demonstrate the scholarship that characterizes an emerging area in Religious Studies—let’s call it critical biblical studies, or more broadly, critical scriptural studies. This work analyzes the way biblical texts reflect and sustain contemporary and ancient power dynamics, political regimes, cultural norms, violences, performative practices, as well as resistances. In its attempt to critique dominant structures, critical biblical studies differs from other important areas of biblical study, those more bounded in their aims (such as solely historical, literary, or theoretical approaches); further, it resists the transcendent closure of using the Bible for theological construction. The subfield has been developing for some time. The Bible & Critical Theory has been an important platform for it, along with Postscripts: A Journal for Sacred Texts and Contemporary Worlds, the Institute for Signifying Scripture, and a growing number of sections at the Society of Biblical Literature, including the many perspectival, contextual, philosophical, and ideological critical sections. The Babylon Complex (Runions 2014), was written with the benefit of these conversations, and I am grateful to be able to respond to these productive engagements with it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《圣经批判研究》将继续
《圣经与批判理论》第11.2期(2015)的六篇文章出色地展示了宗教研究中一个新兴领域的学术特征——让我们称之为批判性圣经研究,或者更广泛地说,批判性圣经研究。这项工作分析了圣经文本反映和维持当代和古代权力动态、政治制度、文化规范、暴力、表演实践以及抵抗的方式。在批判主导结构的尝试中,批判性圣经研究不同于其他重要的圣经研究领域,这些领域的目标更有限(例如仅仅是历史的、文学的或理论的方法);此外,它抵制使用圣经进行神学建构的超越性封闭。子领域已经发展了一段时间。《圣经与批判理论》一直是它的一个重要平台,还有《后记:圣经文本与当代世界期刊》、《圣经符号研究所》,以及《圣经文学学会》中越来越多的部分,包括许多视角、语境、哲学和意识形态的批判部分。《巴比伦复合体》(The Babylon Complex, 2014)就是在这些对话的帮助下写成的,我很感激能够对这些富有成效的参与做出回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 farm outbreaks in Ontario, January-December 2020. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.2 both show similarly reduced disease severity of COVID-19 compared to Delta, Germany, 2021 to 2022. The Israelites Tell Their Story: PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION The Disputed Pauline Letters:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1