Dictionary of foreign words as a lexicographic genre

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Voprosy Leksikografii-Russian Journal of Lexicography Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17223/22274200/25/1
I. Nechaeva
{"title":"Dictionary of foreign words as a lexicographic genre","authors":"I. Nechaeva","doi":"10.17223/22274200/25/1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research was carried out on the material of dictionaries of foreign (foreign-language) words published in the period from the beginning of the 20th century to the present day (a total of nineteen editions). Among them are dictionaries of a general type, including concise ones, as well as dictionaries of neological vocabulary. The article sets the aim of analyzing the experience accumulated over two centuries and identifying the features in their development that are inherent in the dictionary of borrowings as a genre. The author’s field of vision is the issue of the opposition of linguistic and encyclopaedic features of the dictionary description in the dictionary of borrowed words. In the first part of the article, attention is paid to the dictionary’s microstructure, in the second to its macrostructure. Despite the initial conceptual setting on the communication of encyclopaedic information about the concept denoted by a foreign word, features of a linguistic dictionary have always been inherent in loanword dictionaries. This is shown by the material of dictionary entries from papers of different years, starting from 1901. At the level of the dictionary microstructure, such features are: etymology, data on the sphere of use of the word, data on semantic derivation and semantic transfers, paradigmatic connections of the word, its combinatorial properties, closest derivational connections, and variability of form. At the level of macrostructure, this may be a reflection of the typological properties of foreign-language vocabulary (borrowings, quasi-borrowings, hybrid words, secondary borrowings, semantic derivatives). The fact of genetic heterogeneity of borrowed vocabulary has hardly been reflected in dictionary practice until now. All the provisions are illustrated with examples from dictionary editions of different years. Proposed for discussion is the thesis about the unproductiveness of the fundamental opposition of encyclopaedic and linguistic knowledge within the framework of an explanatory dictionary (a dictionary of foreign words by its genre refers to aspect explanatory dictionaries). This thesis is supported by the evidence of well-known lexicographers and examples from the semantic, phraseological and illustrative zones of modern dictionaries. The specificity of the vocabulary of the loanword dictionary is a high percentage of terminological vocabulary, which is essentially a carrier of encyclopaedic information. Therefore, the synthesis of conceptual presentation and linguistic description (in various proportions) in the interpretation of a foreign term is inevitable. In conclusion, a brief typology of dictionaries of foreign words is given in various aspects: in terms of the period of the borrowing of the word, the source language of the borrowing, the addressee of the dictionary, the selection of dictionary units in relation to their belonging to the language standard. The question is raised about the appropriateness of including sub-standard vocabulary in the dictionary of foreign words of a general type. The author declares no conflicts of interests.","PeriodicalId":41132,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Leksikografii-Russian Journal of Lexicography","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Leksikografii-Russian Journal of Lexicography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/22274200/25/1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research was carried out on the material of dictionaries of foreign (foreign-language) words published in the period from the beginning of the 20th century to the present day (a total of nineteen editions). Among them are dictionaries of a general type, including concise ones, as well as dictionaries of neological vocabulary. The article sets the aim of analyzing the experience accumulated over two centuries and identifying the features in their development that are inherent in the dictionary of borrowings as a genre. The author’s field of vision is the issue of the opposition of linguistic and encyclopaedic features of the dictionary description in the dictionary of borrowed words. In the first part of the article, attention is paid to the dictionary’s microstructure, in the second to its macrostructure. Despite the initial conceptual setting on the communication of encyclopaedic information about the concept denoted by a foreign word, features of a linguistic dictionary have always been inherent in loanword dictionaries. This is shown by the material of dictionary entries from papers of different years, starting from 1901. At the level of the dictionary microstructure, such features are: etymology, data on the sphere of use of the word, data on semantic derivation and semantic transfers, paradigmatic connections of the word, its combinatorial properties, closest derivational connections, and variability of form. At the level of macrostructure, this may be a reflection of the typological properties of foreign-language vocabulary (borrowings, quasi-borrowings, hybrid words, secondary borrowings, semantic derivatives). The fact of genetic heterogeneity of borrowed vocabulary has hardly been reflected in dictionary practice until now. All the provisions are illustrated with examples from dictionary editions of different years. Proposed for discussion is the thesis about the unproductiveness of the fundamental opposition of encyclopaedic and linguistic knowledge within the framework of an explanatory dictionary (a dictionary of foreign words by its genre refers to aspect explanatory dictionaries). This thesis is supported by the evidence of well-known lexicographers and examples from the semantic, phraseological and illustrative zones of modern dictionaries. The specificity of the vocabulary of the loanword dictionary is a high percentage of terminological vocabulary, which is essentially a carrier of encyclopaedic information. Therefore, the synthesis of conceptual presentation and linguistic description (in various proportions) in the interpretation of a foreign term is inevitable. In conclusion, a brief typology of dictionaries of foreign words is given in various aspects: in terms of the period of the borrowing of the word, the source language of the borrowing, the addressee of the dictionary, the selection of dictionary units in relation to their belonging to the language standard. The question is raised about the appropriateness of including sub-standard vocabulary in the dictionary of foreign words of a general type. The author declares no conflicts of interests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为词典编纂体裁的外来词词典
本文对20世纪初至今出版的外文词汇词典(共19个版本)的材料进行了研究。其中有一般类型的词典,包括简明词典,也有新词汇词典。本文旨在分析《借词词典》两个多世纪以来积累的经验,找出借词词典作为一种体裁在发展过程中所固有的特点。作者的视野是《外来词词典》中词典描述的语言学特征与百科全书性特征的对立问题。文章的第一部分关注词典的微观结构,第二部分关注词典的宏观结构。尽管外来词所表示的概念在百科全书信息的传播上有最初的概念设置,但外来词词典的语言特征一直是外来词词典所固有的。从1901年开始,不同年份的词典条目的材料显示了这一点。在词典微观结构的层面上,这些特征是:词源、词的使用范围数据、语义派生和语义转移数据、词的聚合连接、词的组合属性、最密切的派生连接和形式的可变性。在宏观结构层面上,这可能反映了外语词汇的类型学特征(借词、准借词、混合词、次借词、语义衍生词)。迄今为止,外来词的遗传异质性在词典实践中几乎没有得到反映。所有的规定都用不同年份的词典版本的例子来说明。本文提出在解释性词典(按体裁分类的外来词词典指方面的解释性词典)的框架内,百科全书知识和语言知识的根本对立是无效的。本文以著名词典编纂者的证据和现代词典的语义、短语和插图领域的例子为依据。外来词词典词汇的专一性是术语词汇占比高,它本质上是百科信息的载体。因此,在外来词的解释中,概念呈现和语言描述(以不同的比例)的综合是不可避免的。最后,从外来词借词的时期、借词的源语、借词的对象、词典单位的选择及其所属语言标准等方面对外来词词典进行了简要的分类。提出了在一般类型外来词词典中收录不合标准词汇是否合适的问题。作者声明没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The mission of the Russian Journal of Lexicography is to accumulate the intellectual potential of scholars and practitioners for the purpose of discussing and solving the topical issues of theoretical and applied lexicography, and new concepts of dictionary compilation.
期刊最新文献
Dictionary of foreign words as a lexicographic genre Methodology for compiling a digital dictionary of homographic proper names and common nouns (based on LPD, EPD, OED) The dictionary’s double “five” (on the 55th anniversary of the publication of the Phraseological Dictionary of the Russian Language edited by Aleksandr Molotkov) Design of a terminological learner’s dictionary in the customs sphere: A corpus approach On the second edition of the Regional Dictionary of Vyatka Dialects: A new look and new approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1