Comparative animal study of the antinociceptive efficacy of lamotrigine and gabapentin for the management of pain.

A. Szabó, I. Bocșan, Ş. Suciu, A. Buzoianu
{"title":"Comparative animal study of the antinociceptive efficacy of lamotrigine and gabapentin for the management of pain.","authors":"A. Szabó, I. Bocșan, Ş. Suciu, A. Buzoianu","doi":"10.1556/036.102.2015.4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"UNLABELLED\nPain relief using drugs with high efficacy provides significant improvement in the patients' lives. Drugs like lamotrigine (LTG) and gabapentin (GBP) have the ability to overcome the symptoms of neuropathic pain.\n\n\nAIM\nThe present study offers a comparative analysis of LTG and GBP efficacy in a rat model of nociceptive pain after single administration.\n\n\nMETHOD\nSixty-three Wistar-Bratislava rats randomized into 7 groups were included: a control group treated with saline solution and 6 groups treated with different doses of LTG and GBP. Nociceptive responses to thermal and mechanical stimulations were evaluated before and after drug administration, at different time intervals, using paw pressure and hot plate tests. The obtained data were statistically analyzed, with significance at p value < 0.05.\n\n\nRESULTS\nLTG 100 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg presented a significant analgesic effect in both mechanical and thermal tests, 1 and 2 hours after administration. GBP 100 mg/kg increased latency time in hot plate test. The effect of both anticonvulsant drugs occurred rapidly after administration, but had a short duration.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nLTG and GBP had an analgesic effect in a single dose administration. The effect of LTG was more evident since it was observed in both tests. Their effect was dose dependent.","PeriodicalId":7167,"journal":{"name":"Acta physiologica Hungarica","volume":"102 4 1","pages":"363-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/036.102.2015.4.3","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta physiologica Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/036.102.2015.4.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

UNLABELLED Pain relief using drugs with high efficacy provides significant improvement in the patients' lives. Drugs like lamotrigine (LTG) and gabapentin (GBP) have the ability to overcome the symptoms of neuropathic pain. AIM The present study offers a comparative analysis of LTG and GBP efficacy in a rat model of nociceptive pain after single administration. METHOD Sixty-three Wistar-Bratislava rats randomized into 7 groups were included: a control group treated with saline solution and 6 groups treated with different doses of LTG and GBP. Nociceptive responses to thermal and mechanical stimulations were evaluated before and after drug administration, at different time intervals, using paw pressure and hot plate tests. The obtained data were statistically analyzed, with significance at p value < 0.05. RESULTS LTG 100 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg presented a significant analgesic effect in both mechanical and thermal tests, 1 and 2 hours after administration. GBP 100 mg/kg increased latency time in hot plate test. The effect of both anticonvulsant drugs occurred rapidly after administration, but had a short duration. CONCLUSIONS LTG and GBP had an analgesic effect in a single dose administration. The effect of LTG was more evident since it was observed in both tests. Their effect was dose dependent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉莫三嗪和加巴喷丁治疗疼痛的动物对照研究。
使用高效的药物缓解疼痛可以显著改善患者的生活。像拉莫三嗪(LTG)和加巴喷丁(GBP)这样的药物能够克服神经性疼痛的症状。目的比较分析单次给药后LTG和GBP对痛觉性疼痛大鼠模型的疗效。方法Wistar-Bratislava大鼠63只,随机分为7组:生理盐水治疗组和不同剂量LTG、GBP治疗组。在给药前后,采用爪压和热板试验,在不同的时间间隔评估热刺激和机械刺激的伤害性反应。所得资料进行统计学分析,p值均< 0.05。结果100 mg/kg和50 mg/kg的sltg在给药后1和2 h的力学和热实验中均有明显的镇痛作用。GBP 100 mg/kg增加热板试验潜伏期。两种抗惊厥药物的作用在给药后迅速发生,但持续时间短。结论sltg和GBP单次给药均有镇痛作用。LTG的作用更明显,因为在两个实验中都观察到了。它们的效果是剂量依赖性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta physiologica Hungarica
Acta physiologica Hungarica 医学-生理学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊最新文献
Comparative animal study of the antinociceptive efficacy of lamotrigine and gabapentin for the management of pain. Lactation protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. The acute muscular effects of cycling with and without different degrees of blood flow restriction. Preventive effects of garlic (Allium sativum) on oxidative stress and histopathology of cardiac tissue in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Effect of 6 weeks of whole body vibration training on total and segmental body composition in healthy young adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1