EVALUATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM THREE CONTRASTING INTEGRATED CROP AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS DURING 1991-2016 IN GANSU OF CHINA

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.21162/PAKJAS/19.6147
Zhengang Yan
{"title":"EVALUATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM THREE CONTRASTING INTEGRATED CROP AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS DURING 1991-2016 IN GANSU OF CHINA","authors":"Zhengang Yan","doi":"10.21162/PAKJAS/19.6147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agricultural production is an important source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which in general accounts for 10-12% of the global anthropogenic GHG emissions (Herreroet al., 2011; Pishgar-Komlehet al., 2013; Bell et al., 2014). Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) are main GHG emission sources in the agricultural production sector, for example, CH4 and N2O emissions in China account for 50% and 92% of national total emissions, respectively (Donget al., 2013). In China, total GHG emissions from agriculture production grew rapidly from 605 Mt CO2-equivelant (CO2-eq) in 1994 to 686 Mt CO2-eq in 2007, and increased by approximately 80Mt per year since 2010 (Chen and Zhang 2010; Dong et al., 2013). There is evidence indicating that the effect on atmospheric temperature derived by climate change has impacted crop production and water use efficiencies in China (Dong et al., 2013; Guoet al., 2010). Chinese government made commitments in the UN Climate Change Conference in 2009 to reduce carbon emissions per unit gross domestic product by 40-50% in 2020 (Chenget al., 2011). Therefore, there is an urgent need to provide detailed information on GHG emissions from crop and livestock production in different region of China, where the agricultural production systems are influenced by climate and other environmental factors. However, there is little information available on the accurate calculation of GHG emissions from agricultural production systems in Northwest China. The lack of such information could impact policy makers and agricultural industries to make informed decisions for mitigation of GHG emissions from agricultural production. Agricultural production systems in China vary greatly in different regions, mainly due to the variations in climate, landscape and other environmental conditions. Even within Gansu Province, a region located in the centre of Northwest China, agricultural activities are commonly categorised in four contrasting areas: Loess Plateau, Hexi Oasis, Qinling Bashan Mountains and Tibet Plateau, mainly according to the climate variation (Renet al., 2009). The detailed information for the first three regions is presented in Table 1. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the regional differences (Loess Plateau vs. Hexi Oasis vs. Qinling Bashan Mountains) in Gansu Province in GHG emission factors associated with producing per unit of crop and livestock Pak. J. Agri. Sci., Vol. 56(2), 469-480; 2019 ISSN (Print) 0552-9034, ISSN (Online) 2076-0906 DOI: 10.21162/PAKJAS/19.6147 http://www.pakjas.com.pk","PeriodicalId":19885,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/19.6147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Agricultural production is an important source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which in general accounts for 10-12% of the global anthropogenic GHG emissions (Herreroet al., 2011; Pishgar-Komlehet al., 2013; Bell et al., 2014). Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) are main GHG emission sources in the agricultural production sector, for example, CH4 and N2O emissions in China account for 50% and 92% of national total emissions, respectively (Donget al., 2013). In China, total GHG emissions from agriculture production grew rapidly from 605 Mt CO2-equivelant (CO2-eq) in 1994 to 686 Mt CO2-eq in 2007, and increased by approximately 80Mt per year since 2010 (Chen and Zhang 2010; Dong et al., 2013). There is evidence indicating that the effect on atmospheric temperature derived by climate change has impacted crop production and water use efficiencies in China (Dong et al., 2013; Guoet al., 2010). Chinese government made commitments in the UN Climate Change Conference in 2009 to reduce carbon emissions per unit gross domestic product by 40-50% in 2020 (Chenget al., 2011). Therefore, there is an urgent need to provide detailed information on GHG emissions from crop and livestock production in different region of China, where the agricultural production systems are influenced by climate and other environmental factors. However, there is little information available on the accurate calculation of GHG emissions from agricultural production systems in Northwest China. The lack of such information could impact policy makers and agricultural industries to make informed decisions for mitigation of GHG emissions from agricultural production. Agricultural production systems in China vary greatly in different regions, mainly due to the variations in climate, landscape and other environmental conditions. Even within Gansu Province, a region located in the centre of Northwest China, agricultural activities are commonly categorised in four contrasting areas: Loess Plateau, Hexi Oasis, Qinling Bashan Mountains and Tibet Plateau, mainly according to the climate variation (Renet al., 2009). The detailed information for the first three regions is presented in Table 1. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the regional differences (Loess Plateau vs. Hexi Oasis vs. Qinling Bashan Mountains) in Gansu Province in GHG emission factors associated with producing per unit of crop and livestock Pak. J. Agri. Sci., Vol. 56(2), 469-480; 2019 ISSN (Print) 0552-9034, ISSN (Online) 2076-0906 DOI: 10.21162/PAKJAS/19.6147 http://www.pakjas.com.pk
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1991-2016年甘肃省农牧一体化生产系统温室气体排放评价
农业生产是温室气体(GHG)排放的重要来源,通常占全球人为温室气体排放的10-12% (herreeroet al., 2011;Pishgar-Komlehet al., 2013;Bell et al., 2014)。甲烷(CH4)和氧化亚氮(N2O)是农业生产部门的主要温室气体排放源,例如中国的CH4和N2O排放量分别占全国总排放量的50%和92% (Donget al., 2013)。在中国,农业生产产生的温室气体排放总量从1994年的6.05亿吨二氧化碳当量(CO2-eq)迅速增长到2007年的6.86亿吨二氧化碳当量,自2010年以来每年增长约8000亿吨(Chen和Zhang 2010;Dong et al., 2013)。有证据表明,气候变化对大气温度的影响影响了中国的作物生产和水分利用效率(Dong et al., 2013;Guoet al., 2010)。中国政府在2009年联合国气候变化大会上作出承诺,到2020年将单位国内生产总值碳排放量减少40-50% (Chenget al., 2011)。因此,迫切需要提供中国不同地区作物和畜牧业生产温室气体排放的详细信息,这些地区的农业生产系统受气候和其他环境因素的影响。然而,关于西北地区农业生产系统温室气体排放的精确计算资料却很少。缺乏这类信息可能会影响决策者和农业行业就减少农业生产产生的温室气体排放作出知情决定。中国不同地区的农业生产系统差异很大,这主要是由于气候、景观和其他环境条件的差异。即使在位于中国西北中部的甘肃省,农业活动也通常被划分为黄土高原、河西绿洲、秦岭巴山和青藏高原四个截然不同的区域,主要是根据气候变化(Renet al., 2009)。表1给出了前三个区域的详细信息。摘要以黄土高原、河西绿洲、秦岭巴山为研究对象,分析了甘肃省农畜单位产量温室气体排放因子的区域差异。j·阿勒。科学。,第56卷(2),469-480;2019 ISSN (Print) 0552-9034, ISSN (Online) 2076-0906 DOI: 10.21162/PAKJAS/19.6147 http://www.pakjas.com.pk
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences is published in English four times a year. The journal publishes original articles on all aspects of agriculture and allied fields.
期刊最新文献
Benefit evaluation of human resource management in agricultural enterprises based on convolutional neural network Effects of Hexythiazox on Different Stages of Mites Infesting Orange Trees Toxic effects of essential oils against Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius, 1889) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and its certain important natural enemies Biological control of root rots on alfalfa with Streptomyces Digital financial inclusion, Chinese farmers’ entrepreneurship well-being and selfconfidence: evidence from rural China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1